|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Press Fit
Even on a drive train with #25 chain?
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Press Fit
We have been anodizing our robots for the past 6 years. There are two ways to deal with the press fit bearing holes.
1. Mask them, and use your machined (and hopefully tightly toleranced) hole for your press fit. 2. Use them to your advantage and try to create a press fit using the anodize. I highly recommend going with method #1. We have had to clear away anodizing inside a bearing hole many times because the press fit ended up being too tight. Year to year, batch to batch, we just couldn't get a consistent enough thickness on the anodize where we were comfortable using it as THE press fit. Just my opinion based on our experiences in the world of anodizing. -Brando |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Press Fit
A standard Type II color anodize should not add any more than about 0.0004 inches. A hard anodize certainly would. I second the recommendation to capture the bearings, and size them for a close slip fit. Pressing them is nice simply so they don't fall out during maintenance but it's difficult to get the perfect fit. You're looking for in the neighborhood of 0.0003 smaller.
Unless you have a high-end shop doing the work to your tolerances and inspecting it, be sure to give them an actual bearing they can reference to check as they're machining the parts. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Press Fit
Yup.
For the last three seasons, all the sheet metal parts on 228's robots have never had actual press fit bearing holes, simply because that would cause our sponsor to have to swap out a standard size die (0.875") for the less common press fit size in the turret punch. We've dealt with this two ways: 1) use flanged bearings, stepped shafts and Delrin spacers to keep everything captured, and 2) put some Loctite around the outside of the bearing when inserting it the first time. For a FRC robot that will literally only see tens of hours of operation, this works just fine. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Press Fit
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Press Fit
Thanks for the tip Arthur.
![]() |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Press Fit
Quote:
// Which is also a great tip for all robotics teams: ditch your liquid Loctite and switch to Loctite 248. This is available in a "QuickStix" form (it's basically a glue-stick) and is more or less impossible to spill or drip on things. Before 228 switched to this, our students used to constantly spill and waste Loctite. Now, one tube seems to last forever. |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Press Fit
We make most of our press fits for bearings .0005-.0002 undersize. Even attempting this without a CNC machine is a waste of time, IMO. You're better off just reaming it to the nominal size and using some of the green wicking loctite to retain the bearing. It's as good as a press (and absolutely will not let go, without extreme heat).
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Press Fit
Side topic -- somewhat related I suppose --
For a 1-1/8" (or 1-1/16") Silver & Demming bit that would cut into 1/4" Polycarb and/or 1/4" Aluminum ... ... would we want to get a carbide-tipped bit or would a HSS bit suffice? This assumes that S&D bits can do the 1-1/8" hole without too much slop, which also assumes we would do starter holes with a smaller drill bit first. It would also be done on a mill we've been able to get within 1/64" after nominal practice. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Press Fit
Quote:
My opinion is that for 1/4" and thinner you'd be better off with a good quality step drill, hole cutter, and/or reamer, depending on what sort of fit you wanted. I don't like how big drill bits like that are not very forgiving. They can make 'triangle holes' and catch big burrs and spin parts when they're used in thin material. |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Press Fit
Quote:
-Brando |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Press Fit
For Loctite, 680 is good stuff. It's the green gap filling formula. I wouldn't necessarily use it to hold a gear to a shaft rotationally for instance, but man, that stuff does not budge once cured. I once glued a steel gear to a steel shaft with it and it took about 5 minutes with a propane torch, a vise, and the biggest pair of channel-locks I had to get them apart. Good for holding in bearings when you mess up the press fit tolerance.
I remember Mike from 233 telling me he would have gearbox plates waterjetted with the bearing holes a little undersized and simply run a reamer through them on a bridgeport while letting the plate "float" on the table. I was surprised they could hold an accurate enough center distance that way but apparently it works. A 1 1/8" silver and demming drill will not make a 1.125 hole, nor will it make a round hole, especially in 1/4" just due to the size of it. The tip of the drill is more than 1/4" tall. You can do it, and it will work, but the hole won't be great. You'll be lucky if it ends up 1.127 which is a bit sloppy. You'll have to run down somewhere around 250 RPM too. If you're working on a manual mill I suppose you could drill and ream. Do something like drill 27/32 or 55/64 for the 7/8" OD bearing and then ream to .875ish and likewise (a 64th or a 32nd undersize) for the 1.125 bearing. They make reamers that are .0005 undersize. You perhaps could try something like a TCT hole cutter to do it all in one shot. I don't have experience with them though. I'm guessing your results would be better with a reamer. Last edited by sanddrag : 14-12-2011 at 17:32. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|