|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pneumatic Tubing Specs
Andy-Mark tubing is .17 ID are they not selling 2011 illegal tubing? There is nylon and polyethylene tubing that have better pressure ratings but, larger ID's so they also would be illegal even though they are tougher.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Pneumatic Tubing Specs
Quote:
Actually, this is precisely the reason FIRST needs to specify tolerances in the rulebook. Does FIRST actually care about this difference, and how are the teams and inspectors supposed to know? The Q&A, with its delayed responses, blackout period and low readership is insufficient compared to the dead-simple alternative of Edit: Wait—why am I giving a ± tolerance? I should have recommended MAX Ø0.175 in. FIRST can't possibly care enough to intend to prevent a team from competing with undersized tubing. (That has happened; an unfortunate consequence of enforcing the rules.) Last edited by Tristan Lall : 03-01-2012 at 00:29. Reason: Better idea. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Pneumatic Tubing Specs
As others have said, the 2011 rules may or may not apply to the 2012 rules.
However, based on my experience over the last 7 years, pneumatic tubing has been pretty much the same. 0.16 ID, 0.25 OD, 125PSI. From Mcmaster-Carr, these part numbers would be the ones to use: Opaque Black 9149T21 Opaque Blue 9149T24 Opaque Green 9149T22 Opaque White 9149T23 Last edited by Phalanx : 02-01-2012 at 16:11. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pneumatic Tubing Specs
They are also giving a discount this year, contact them through their website and they will send you the code and also tell you the tubing specs that they supply in the past kit of parts.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Pneumatic Tubing Specs
Quote:
All that said, please note that the Pneumatic Tubing available on FIRST Choice does not have specs on AndyMark's website (and even the picture of the black tubing is different from that previously posted). The link to the product website specifies 14 different specs, one of which includes the 1.6" ID tubing we've had in the past. So... Everyone should just wait 4 more days before purchasing any pneumatic tubing for the season ![]() |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Pneumatic Tubing Specs
Quote:
It wouldn't be a stretch to wonder if they might have accidentally suggested something about the 2012 KOP specs by offering non-KOP, but compatible tubing themselves. Another possibility is, as you mentioned, that they offer it independently of their FIRST offerings. (If it's not FRC-legal, the lack of a disclaimer to that effect will be less than ideal after the 2012 kickoff, given that FRC is their principal market.) In this case, you're correct that they list what appears to be the conventional Freelin-Wade KOP tubing under the FIRST Choice 2012 catalogue. (And of course none of this can easily be confirmed or dismissed until the manual is released. I'm prepared to wait.) Last edited by Tristan Lall : 03-01-2012 at 12:23. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Pneumatic Tubing Specs
Since the AM tubing is on FIRST Choice, I would presume that the GDC at least intends for it to be legal irrespective of a 0.01" diameter difference. The difference could simply be Freelin-Wade rounding a decimal versus AM using calipers and rounding the other way ... or vice-versa.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Pneumatic Tubing Specs
I've given the Pneumatics workshop in Washington State for the last two years. Here is what I tell all the people who attend my workshops. Never buy pneumatics tubing or brass fittings. Every FRC team gets a lifetime supply of this every year. Find a Vet team in your area and they would give you some for free.
-Jim PS That is if the 2012 tube is the same as the 2011-2002 |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Pneumatic Tubing Specs
Quote:
. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Pneumatic Tubing Specs
Quote:
Thank you, -Jim |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|