Go to Post Beware of the following: boredom intelligence = ??? <- could be anything... - JBotAlan [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2012, 10:15
bardd's Avatar
bardd bardd is offline
That loud guy
AKA: Bar Danino
FRC #2212 (The Spikes)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Israel, Lod
Posts: 347
bardd has a brilliant futurebardd has a brilliant futurebardd has a brilliant futurebardd has a brilliant futurebardd has a brilliant futurebardd has a brilliant futurebardd has a brilliant futurebardd has a brilliant futurebardd has a brilliant futurebardd has a brilliant futurebardd has a brilliant future
Re: Lighter Robots

You can use #25 chains instead of #35 (that you get in the KOP). #25 chains are twice as light, and even though they're weaker, you can still hang 6 robots (~720 lbs) on a single chain without it breaking (it can hold up to 780 lbs). Sometimes you might want to use the regular, #35 chains in arms and the like, because of the stress (just to be on the safe side, there's no reason a #25 chain will break on an arm), but there is no reason not to use them in the drive system, unless you don't have the money to buy them.
Reply With Quote
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2012, 12:52
John's Avatar
John John is offline
Registered User
AKA: John Gillespie
FRC #1153 (Roborebels)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Walpole MA
Posts: 71
John is just really niceJohn is just really niceJohn is just really niceJohn is just really niceJohn is just really nice
Re: Lighter Robots

One thing to remember about #25 chain is it must be tensioned properly in order to work well, while #35 chain pretty much keeps working even if it has a little slack in it. So if you use it, make sure you have some plan for keeping it tensioned, either with a mechanical tensioner or by designing exact center-to-center dimensions.
Reply With Quote
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2012, 14:03
dtengineering's Avatar
dtengineering dtengineering is offline
Teaching Teachers to Teach Tech
AKA: Jason Brett
no team (British Columbia FRC teams)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,833
dtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Lighter Robots

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexH View Post
Tell your robot to lay off the McDonalds...

Why would you want a lighter robot? Heavier robot = more downforce on the wheels = harder to push.
True enough... but often at competitions you have to make repairs and/or upgrades to your machine. As you are doing them under the heat of competition, they rarely make your robot lighter.

In Toronto one year we weighed in at about 118.5, broke a component or two, fixed them up and strengthened them a bit and... then had to be reweighted for elimination rounds.

120.0 lbs.

I'd also suggest building your robot a little under sized in each dimension so that in the event of a major impact causing a slight frame twist (or adding a bolt to make a repair) you don't go from legal to illegal.

As a tech inspector I am always pleased when size and weight are mere formalities and not serious obstacles.

Jason
Reply With Quote
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2012, 14:19
AdamHeard's Avatar
AdamHeard AdamHeard is offline
Lead Mentor
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Atascadero
Posts: 5,526
AdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AdamHeard
Re: Lighter Robots

I could go on for days, but I'll list the few that bring in the biggest weight savings for the least effort for us.

-thinner materials (both tubing wall thickness and plate in generally). Thinner extrusion tubing is far lighter and far more efficient in terms of strength.

-Plastic spacers/standoffs (they're cots from mcmaster in all sorts of sizes from $5-10 for 100 QTY) instead of custom metal.

-Smaller Fasteners. We try to only use #10-32 (which is killer strong if you check the math), and have now implemented #4-40's to supplement them in lower load spots.

-Focus on Quantity. Look at what parts you robot has a LOT of, take a small bit of weight from them (either in thinner material, pocketing, whatever is is) and it adds up fast.

-Plastic fasteners for electronics and low load spots (plastic rivets as well).

-Rivets instead of bolts for many items. We tend to add a lot of little gussets, brackets, doo-dads, wire tie downs, etc... If we bolted all these on versus rivets, it'd add up FAST!

Most of what I suggested above is pretty much effective use of COTS fasteners, and would maybe cost a team $100-200 per season versus their usual methods, but can easily save 5+ lbs without changing the function, strength, or performance of the robot. Pick up 100 1.5" long 1/4-20's with their associated washers and nuts and you'll see what I mean.
Reply With Quote
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2012, 15:58
bardd's Avatar
bardd bardd is offline
That loud guy
AKA: Bar Danino
FRC #2212 (The Spikes)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Israel, Lod
Posts: 347
bardd has a brilliant futurebardd has a brilliant futurebardd has a brilliant futurebardd has a brilliant futurebardd has a brilliant futurebardd has a brilliant futurebardd has a brilliant futurebardd has a brilliant futurebardd has a brilliant futurebardd has a brilliant futurebardd has a brilliant future
Re: Lighter Robots

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard View Post
-Rivets instead of bolts for many items. We tend to add a lot of little gussets, brackets, doo-dads, wire tie downs, etc... If we bolted all these on versus rivets, it'd add up FAST!
Also, if you want to use bolts, try and use the smallest possible. According to stories of the older guys in my team, in 2010 the robot was 0.5lbs overweight three hours before shipping, so they cut all the bolts and left only the length they needed, and that got them to just under 120lbs. Since cutting bolts is not recommended, becuase it makes them alot harder to open and close, you better use small bolts to begin with.
Reply With Quote
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2012, 17:43
Ian Curtis Ian Curtis is offline
Best Available Data
FRC #1778 (Chill Out!)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 2,521
Ian Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Lighter Robots

Quote:
Originally Posted by bardd View Post
Also, if you want to use bolts, try and use the smallest possible. According to stories of the older guys in my team, in 2010 the robot was 0.5lbs overweight three hours before shipping, so they cut all the bolts and left only the length they needed, and that got them to just under 120lbs. Since cutting bolts is not recommended, becuase it makes them alot harder to open and close, you better use small bolts to begin with.
Thread a nut on before you hacksaw the excess off, then unthread it off afterwards. It may turn off pretty hard, but it will clean the threads up significantly.

Since steel is way denser than aluminum and teams often tend to use much larger bolts that necessary, this is probably the first course of action on Thursday when you try to meet weight.
__________________
CHILL OUT! | Aero Stability & Control Engineer
Adam Savage's Obsessions (TED Talk) (Part 2)
It is much easier to call someone else a genius than admit to yourself that you are lazy. - Dave Gingery
Reply With Quote
  #22   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2012, 17:54
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,823
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Lighter Robots

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian Curtis View Post
Thread a nut on before you hacksaw the excess off, then unthread it off afterwards. It may turn off pretty hard, but it will clean the threads up significantly.
Or it'll help align the Dremel with a cutoff wheel, which doesn't mess up the threads as much... Oh, wait, that won't work in the pits, as it throws sparks. OK, so you do that at home and hacksaw at the event!
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

Reply With Quote
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2012, 18:55
engunneer's Avatar
engunneer engunneer is offline
Alumni turned Mentor
AKA: Branden Gunn
FRC #4761
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Reading, MA
Posts: 876
engunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Lighter Robots

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard View Post
-Smaller Fasteners. We try to only use #10-32 (which is killer strong if you check the math), and have now implemented #4-40's to supplement them in lower load spots.
The same math says never use #6-32. It has the worst strength to weight ratio in the #4 to 1/4" range, IIRC.

#10 and #4 will do 90% of what you need.
__________________
Student FRC23 (1996-1999), Mentor FRC246 (2000), Mentor FRC1318 (2007-2009), Mentor FRC93 (2011), Mentor FRC2151 (2012), Mentor FRC23 (2013), Mentor FRC4761 (2014-2017)
1998 - National Chairman's Award and Woodie Flowers Award (FRC23, Mike Bastoni ) | 2007 - PNW SF (488, 1595) | 2008 - Oregon RCA - Seattle #2 Seed, SF (488, 1696) | 2009 - Oregon #1 Seed, Winners (1983, 2635) - Seattle SF (945, 2865) - Galileo #2 Seed, SF (973, 25) | 2012 Midwest F (111, 71) | 2014 RIDE Winners (78, 125), Inspector - NEU #24, QF (3479, 3958) - NECMP #35 | 2015 Reading #11, SF (1058, 190), Inspector - RIDE #17, QF(4055, 5494), Inspector - NECMP #57 | 2016 Reading #4, SF (133, 4474), DCA, Inspector - Ride #22, SF (1735, 2067), Creativity, Inspector - NECMP #48, RCA - Archimedes
Reply With Quote
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2012, 18:59
DonRotolo's Avatar
DonRotolo DonRotolo is offline
Back to humble
FRC #0832
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 7,019
DonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Lighter Robots

Quote:
Originally Posted by dtengineering View Post
I'd also suggest building your robot a little under sized in each dimension
Quoted for truth
__________________

I am N2IRZ - What's your callsign?
Reply With Quote
  #25   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2012, 20:12
lil'est lavery's Avatar
lil'est lavery lil'est lavery is offline
Registered User
AKA: Megan Lavery
FRC #0116 (Epsilon Delta)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Herndon, Va
Posts: 13
lil'est lavery has a brilliant futurelil'est lavery has a brilliant futurelil'est lavery has a brilliant futurelil'est lavery has a brilliant futurelil'est lavery has a brilliant futurelil'est lavery has a brilliant futurelil'est lavery has a brilliant futurelil'est lavery has a brilliant futurelil'est lavery has a brilliant futurelil'est lavery has a brilliant futurelil'est lavery has a brilliant future
Re: Lighter Robots

In DC, we were 0.1 over the weight limit, so we let the air out of the tanks for the pneumatics and ended up at 119.9
__________________
Who Team 116?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:15.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi