Go to Post If there's one thing that I love, it's a good scouting challenge! - wilhitern1 [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-01-2012, 17:56
yclee31's Avatar
yclee31 yclee31 is offline
Programmer, Electrical, Design, etc
AKA: MINS
FRC #2429 (LCEC)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Seoul
Posts: 14
yclee31 is a jewel in the roughyclee31 is a jewel in the roughyclee31 is a jewel in the roughyclee31 is a jewel in the rough
Smile Tube scoring idea

As soon as I finished the kickoff video, I was thinking about using tube to carry a ball and sort of just dropping them over the hoop. Yes, I will only be able to use this for the 2 point hoops but I thought it would be the most insuring way of scoring safely rather than shooting.

Please replay any pros and cons about the idea and tell me what you think
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-01-2012, 18:40
GaryVoshol's Avatar
GaryVoshol GaryVoshol is offline
Cogito ergo arbitro
no team
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 5,747
GaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Tube scoring idea

How far out will that tube extend?
__________________
(since 2004)
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-01-2012, 19:01
Tetraman's Avatar
Tetraman Tetraman is offline
FIRST on my mind
AKA: Evan Raitt
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 1,322
Tetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Tube scoring idea

Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryVoshol View Post
How far out will that tube extend?
Any answer greater than 14 inches is a wrong answer, that's for sure.
__________________
"For every great theory about design, there is a better and contradictory theory about design. And don't let the irony of that escape you."
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-01-2012, 19:09
jzhu jzhu is offline
Registered User
FRC #1391
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: US
Posts: 2
jzhu is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Tube scoring idea

Not necessarily, the rule says your robot can extend up to 14'' in any direction but max height can be 84''. Do the geometry, you can have a lot more than 14''
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-01-2012, 19:18
lcoreyl's Avatar
lcoreyl lcoreyl is offline
WittyTitleGen can't link to library
AKA: Milner
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 201
lcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud of
Re: Tube scoring idea

I think being more "automatic" in your shooting will be a great benefit this year, so you are on to something.

If we assume you are going back and forth to get balls, keep in mind you would need to lower from 84" to 60" (at least) when on the other side of the field.
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-01-2012, 19:22
nighterfighter nighterfighter is offline
1771 Alum, 1771 Mentor
AKA: Matt B
FRC #1771 (1771)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Suwanee/Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 835
nighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant future
Re: Tube scoring idea

Quote:
Originally Posted by jzhu View Post
Not necessarily, the rule says your robot can extend up to 14'' in any direction but max height can be 84''. Do the geometry, you can have a lot more than 14''


The most you can extend out it any one direction (barring height, so basically lateral) is 14".

No amount of geometry will change the length of a straight line.
Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-01-2012, 19:24
sah sah is offline
Registered User
FRC #2374
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1
sah is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Tube scoring idea

I believe that the fender prevents directly dropping balls in the hoop because the edges of the fender are more than 14" from the edges of the hoops. And don't forget about the fact that your bumpers will add more space to traverse. Those factors combined put the hoops farther than the distance robots can reach. Although, you could add a small piston on the end of an arm or something like that and that would compensate for the fact that the arm alone can't reach the hoops.
Reply With Quote
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-01-2012, 19:25
Kevin Sevcik's Avatar
Kevin Sevcik Kevin Sevcik is online now
(Insert witty comment here)
FRC #0057 (The Leopards)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,685
Kevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kevin Sevcik Send a message via Yahoo to Kevin Sevcik
Re: Tube scoring idea

A glancing at the field drawings and doing a little arithmetic, the front edge of the hoop is something like 12.5" behind the front edge of the fender. If you figure your robot's bumper eats up 3.5" of your 14" extension, then your tube will be 2" short of the front edge of the rim. Something to think about in your design.

Also, this thread title seemed incredibly outdated when I first saw it. Scoring tubes is sooo 2011.
__________________
The difficult we do today; the impossible we do tomorrow. Miracles by appointment only.

Lone Star Regional Troubleshooter
Reply With Quote
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-01-2012, 21:02
Ninja_Bait's Avatar
Ninja_Bait Ninja_Bait is offline
Former Prez of Making Things Go
AKA: Jake Potter
FRC #0694 (StuyPulse)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 650
Ninja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Tube scoring idea

Quote:
Originally Posted by sah View Post
I believe that the fender prevents directly dropping balls in the hoop because the edges of the fender are more than 14" from the edges of the hoops. And don't forget about the fact that your bumpers will add more space to traverse. Those factors combined put the hoops farther than the distance robots can reach. Although, you could add a small piston on the end of an arm or something like that and that would compensate for the fact that the arm alone can't reach the hoops.
Just give it a little more juice and spit the balls the extra foot.
__________________
You can't fix something that isn't broken... but you can always break things that aren't fixed!

Reply With Quote
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-01-2012, 23:37
treffk's Avatar
treffk treffk is offline
botgirl
AKA: Kelli
FRC #1802 (Stealth)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 301
treffk has much to be proud oftreffk has much to be proud oftreffk has much to be proud oftreffk has much to be proud oftreffk has much to be proud oftreffk has much to be proud oftreffk has much to be proud oftreffk has much to be proud oftreffk has much to be proud oftreffk has much to be proud of
Re: Tube scoring idea

First of all:
[R02]
The Robot must satisfy the following size constraints:
horizontal dimensions must not exceed 28 by 38 in.,
the absolute height must not exceed 84 in.,
the height of the Robot at the start of the match must not exceed 60 in.,
any appendage may not extend more than 14 in. beyond the frame perimeter, and
no other part of the Robot may extend beyond the vertical projection of the Frame Perimeter (with the exception of minor protrusions permitted per 0).


Secondly:

A Fender is located directly below the Hoops at each end of the Court. The Fender is designed to protect the Hoops from damage by Robots. The Fender is 38-3/4 in. deep by 101 in. wide and measures 8-1/4 in. tall at the front, and 10-1/4 in. tall at the back against the Alliance Wall.

From my take on these 2 rules copied directly from the manual and the other factors that the hoops inner diameter is 18 inches and the hoop is 6 inches away from the backboard(at the narrowest part). 38.75-(6+18)=14.75-14=0.75. There would be no possible way to be directly above the hoop. This is just my take, please correct me if I'm wrong.
__________________
"If you always says yes, what are your yeses worth?"

Alumna of FRC Team 1802
Reply With Quote
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-01-2012, 23:40
theprgramerdude theprgramerdude is offline
WPI Freshman
AKA: Alex
FRC #2503 (Warrior Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Brainerd, Minnesota
Posts: 347
theprgramerdude has much to be proud oftheprgramerdude has much to be proud oftheprgramerdude has much to be proud oftheprgramerdude has much to be proud oftheprgramerdude has much to be proud oftheprgramerdude has much to be proud oftheprgramerdude has much to be proud oftheprgramerdude has much to be proud oftheprgramerdude has much to be proud oftheprgramerdude has much to be proud of
Re: Tube scoring idea

Quote:
Originally Posted by nighterfighter View Post


The most you can extend out it any one direction (barring height, so basically lateral) is 14".

No amount of geometry will change the length of a straight line.
Are we talking only in Euclidean space, or can we generalize to non-linear space?
__________________
Attending: MN Duluth Regional
Reply With Quote
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2012, 02:48
mesamb1's Avatar
mesamb1 mesamb1 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Sam Bacon
FRC #1466 (Webb Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Knoxville
Posts: 93
mesamb1 is just really nicemesamb1 is just really nicemesamb1 is just really nicemesamb1 is just really nice
Re: Tube scoring idea

Quote:
Originally Posted by theprgramerdude View Post
Are we talking only in Euclidean space, or can we generalize to non-linear space?
Our robot design idea is use more then the first 4 dimensions. We are taking advantage of an alternative universe where our ball is allready in the hoop and switching that ball with the ball on our robot in this dimension. In one universe our robot does terrible, but great in this universe. The balls might be different(depending on how you interpret quantum physics), but I challenge the refs to definitively prove it one way or another.
Reply With Quote
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2012, 03:12
TD912 TD912 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Chris Leung
FRC #1989 (Viking Robotics)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Vernon, NJ
Posts: 156
TD912 has much to be proud ofTD912 has much to be proud ofTD912 has much to be proud ofTD912 has much to be proud ofTD912 has much to be proud ofTD912 has much to be proud ofTD912 has much to be proud ofTD912 has much to be proud ofTD912 has much to be proud ofTD912 has much to be proud of
Re: Tube scoring idea

Don't forget that for this to work you would have to line yourself up with the hoops. You would be out of the "key" zone, so other robots could easily push you out of alignment.
__________________
Zip-ties, hot glue, and duct tape.

2008 New York City Regional Champions - (41/555/1989)
2009 Brunswick Eruption 8 Finalists - (1989/56/1807)
2010 PARC XIII Champions - (25/341/1989)

Over The Bump
Reply With Quote
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2012, 10:58
ThaineP
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Tube scoring idea

My team noticed that the 'safe zone' directly under the hoop is raised vertically a few inches, so it will be difficult to get directly under the hoops.
Reply With Quote
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2012, 15:42
yclee31's Avatar
yclee31 yclee31 is offline
Programmer, Electrical, Design, etc
AKA: MINS
FRC #2429 (LCEC)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Seoul
Posts: 14
yclee31 is a jewel in the roughyclee31 is a jewel in the roughyclee31 is a jewel in the roughyclee31 is a jewel in the rough
Re: Tube scoring idea

i was keeping rule [R02] in my mind too but was confused about the appendage part.. anyone wanna help me making that part clear?

so appendage must not exceed 14 inch from frame parameter. but does frame parameter refers to initial robot height parameter or 84 inch absolute parameter height? im guessing initial robot parameter but hoping for the absolute one
__________________

Last edited by yclee31 : 08-01-2012 at 20:33.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 19:29.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi