Go to Post However, the skill of calculating things by hand and sketching by hand is something that we should continue to teach the youth (until my netbook can run Inventor :D) - Zach O [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2012, 01:48
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,827
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bumper question

Quote:
Originally Posted by slijin View Post
You're looking for [R33]; if the width of the gap >= 8", then it can only go 1/4" in; otherwise, there seems to be no apparent limit other than your bot itself.
Ah, but if you don't have a bumper in that section, then there is no limit at all! Well, unless you happen to like having two half-robots.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

Reply With Quote
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2012, 09:32
buildmaster5000 buildmaster5000 is offline
Trying to program the swerve drive
AKA: Alex
FRC #2421 (Rolling Thunder Robotics)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: May 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 207
buildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud of
Re: Bumper question

What defines the bumper zone this year?? In the past, I remember it being from 1 to 7 inches above the ground (2010 excluded. Bumpers were higher that year), but I cannot seem to find where the "bumper zone" is defined in the manual.

Both <R01> and <R29> reference a "bumper zone" for those who are wondering. Please tell me that bumpers are going to be like the height limit last year, waiting for Q&A to open to ask a question that will greatly impact designs...
__________________
-Alex



2010 Washington DC Regional: Engineering Excellence Award
Reply With Quote
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2012, 09:37
the man's Avatar
the man the man is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jacob Overla
FRC #4004
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: muskegon MI
Posts: 344
the man is on a distinguished road
Re: Bumper question

2 to 10 in above the floor.
__________________
Every day is a new adventure!!!
Reply With Quote
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2012, 11:32
Unsung FIRST Hero
Al Skierkiewicz Al Skierkiewicz is offline
Broadcast Eng/Chief Robot Inspector
AKA: Big Al WFFA 2005
FRC #0111 (WildStang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Wheeling, IL
Posts: 10,798
Al Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bumper question

Eagle's interpretation is correct. However, in the past this spec was 6" (six) inches.
__________________
Good Luck All. Learn something new, everyday!
Al
WB9UVJ
www.wildstang.org
________________________
Storming the Tower since 1996.
Reply With Quote
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2012, 11:41
slijin's Avatar
slijin slijin is offline
Pockets
AKA: Samuel Lijin
FRC #0694 (StuyPulse)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: New York City
Posts: 537
slijin is a splendid one to beholdslijin is a splendid one to beholdslijin is a splendid one to beholdslijin is a splendid one to beholdslijin is a splendid one to beholdslijin is a splendid one to beholdslijin is a splendid one to behold
Re: Bumper question

Quote:
Originally Posted by buildmaster5000 View Post
What defines the bumper zone this year?? In the past, I remember it being from 1 to 7 inches above the ground (2010 excluded. Bumpers were higher that year), but I cannot seem to find where the "bumper zone" is defined in the manual.

Both <R01> and <R29> reference a "bumper zone" for those who are wondering. Please tell me that bumpers are going to be like the height limit last year, waiting for Q&A to open to ask a question that will greatly impact designs...
[R01] actually defines the Bumper Zone as 2"-10" above the ground, just to reiterate what previous posters have pointed out
__________________

2010-12 CT Chairman's
2011 Galileo 5th seed
2010 NY Regional Winners
Reply With Quote
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2012, 11:50
Steven Donow Steven Donow is offline
Registered User
AKA: Scooby
no team
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,335
Steven Donow has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Donow has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Donow has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Donow has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Donow has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Donow has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Donow has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Donow has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Donow has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Donow has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Donow has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bumper question

Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinGoneNuts View Post
While I have you all here. I also have a bumper question. Attached is a picture of a bumper idea, after reading the rules it seems that this is alright? I want to be 100% sure. Does it seem okay to you?


Attachment 11290
In contrast to this, if the bumper sections on the right and left of the 12" gap were 4", that would be illegal, right?(This was already kinda answered, but just making sure). Because I know Figures 4.1-4.3 aren't exactly drawn to scale, but they imply otherwise.

Last edited by Steven Donow : 08-01-2012 at 11:52.
Reply With Quote
  #22   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2012, 11:56
Ernst's Avatar
Ernst Ernst is offline
Ernst
AKA: Ernst
FRC #1732 (Hilltoppers)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 297
Ernst has a reputation beyond reputeErnst has a reputation beyond reputeErnst has a reputation beyond reputeErnst has a reputation beyond reputeErnst has a reputation beyond reputeErnst has a reputation beyond reputeErnst has a reputation beyond reputeErnst has a reputation beyond reputeErnst has a reputation beyond reputeErnst has a reputation beyond reputeErnst has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bumper question

Yes. You need a minimum of 8 inches of bumper on each side of each exterior vertex.
Reply With Quote
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2012, 12:09
Unsung FIRST Hero
Al Skierkiewicz Al Skierkiewicz is offline
Broadcast Eng/Chief Robot Inspector
AKA: Big Al WFFA 2005
FRC #0111 (WildStang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Wheeling, IL
Posts: 10,798
Al Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bumper question

Quote:
Originally Posted by stevend1994 View Post
In contrast to this, if the bumper sections on the right and left of the 12" gap were 4", that would be illegal, right?(This was already kinda answered, but just making sure). Because I know Figures 4.1-4.3 aren't exactly drawn to scale, but they imply otherwise.
No, the 8" specification relates to each side of the vertices in a continuous bumper section. The belief is that something as small as 4" would not protect your robot or another from damage in a collision.
__________________
Good Luck All. Learn something new, everyday!
Al
WB9UVJ
www.wildstang.org
________________________
Storming the Tower since 1996.
Reply With Quote
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2012, 12:18
Cyberphil's Avatar
Cyberphil Cyberphil is offline
That Guy
AKA: Phil
FRC #0103 (Cybersonics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Kintersville
Posts: 755
Cyberphil has much to be proud ofCyberphil has much to be proud ofCyberphil has much to be proud ofCyberphil has much to be proud ofCyberphil has much to be proud ofCyberphil has much to be proud ofCyberphil has much to be proud ofCyberphil has much to be proud ofCyberphil has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to Cyberphil
Re: Bumper question

I agree with Al.

The rule states each side of each exterior vertex, which means on one exterior vertex you must have 8" of bumpers on one side and 8" of bumpers on the other side. That means that on the long side of your robot you can have a maximum opening of 22" and on the short side a maximum opening of 12" (assuming your bot is rectangular).
Reply With Quote
  #25   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2012, 19:09
SenorZ's Avatar
SenorZ SenorZ is offline
Physics Teacher
AKA: Tom Zook
FRC #4276 (Surf City Vikings)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Huntington Beach, California
Posts: 948
SenorZ has a reputation beyond reputeSenorZ has a reputation beyond reputeSenorZ has a reputation beyond reputeSenorZ has a reputation beyond reputeSenorZ has a reputation beyond reputeSenorZ has a reputation beyond reputeSenorZ has a reputation beyond reputeSenorZ has a reputation beyond reputeSenorZ has a reputation beyond reputeSenorZ has a reputation beyond reputeSenorZ has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bumper question

I've attached an image from Figure 4-3.
Why is the circled corner not ok?
Is it because
a) it is an interior vertex and cannot be bumper-ed,
b) the adjacent exterior vertex is not covered
c) the straight section of frame connecting it to the exterior vertex is less then 8''

To me it seems like they are saying you can't have a bumper go inside a cut-out. Which is odd.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Untitled.jpg
Views:	79
Size:	41.5 KB
ID:	11296  
Reply With Quote
  #26   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2012, 19:13
Ninja_Bait's Avatar
Ninja_Bait Ninja_Bait is offline
Former Prez of Making Things Go
AKA: Jake Potter
FRC #0694 (StuyPulse)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 650
Ninja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bumper question

Answer B is covered by the arrow below the one you circled. C is covered in another diagram explaining dimensional rules. A is correct. R27:

Quote:
Robots are required to use Bumpers to protect all exterior vertices of the Frame Perimeter.
That is not considered an exterior vertex because it is contained in the frame perimeter. The perimeter is defined by the vertical rightmost edge and does not include the inlet.
__________________
You can't fix something that isn't broken... but you can always break things that aren't fixed!

Reply With Quote
  #27   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2012, 19:22
GaryVoshol's Avatar
GaryVoshol GaryVoshol is offline
Cogito ergo arbitro
no team
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 5,764
GaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bumper question

Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorZ View Post
To me it seems like they are saying you can't have a bumper go inside a cut-out. Which is odd.
You can have a bumper-like structure inside your Frame Perimeter (FP), but you can't have a Bumper inside the FP.

The difference is in the weight allocation. Any bumper-like structure inside the FP must be counted in the 120 lbs limit. And if you make them color-coded, so that you have 2 of them, you have to count the weight of both pieces at the same time (additional Mechanisms).

Your robot could look somewhat like the circled area except:
-- the bumper-like structure on the inside of the cutout could not extend past the frame
-- the Bumper could not extend past the vertex
__________________
(since 2004)
Reply With Quote
  #28   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2012, 22:47
Unsung FIRST Hero
Al Skierkiewicz Al Skierkiewicz is offline
Broadcast Eng/Chief Robot Inspector
AKA: Big Al WFFA 2005
FRC #0111 (WildStang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Wheeling, IL
Posts: 10,798
Al Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bumper question

Quite frankly, I don't know why that interior bumper is outlined as "not OK". The rules say that a bumper must attach to the frame perimeter, which it does, it must be a minimum of 8" on either side of an exterior vertex, can't tell since the drawing is not dimensioned, etc. There do appear to be any rules that prevent interior bumpers. If I find out, I will let you know.
__________________
Good Luck All. Learn something new, everyday!
Al
WB9UVJ
www.wildstang.org
________________________
Storming the Tower since 1996.
Reply With Quote
  #29   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2012, 22:57
Rocketeeringer's Avatar
Rocketeeringer Rocketeeringer is offline
Registered User
FRC #0020 (The Rocketeers)
Team Role: Communications
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Clifton Park, NY
Posts: 18
Rocketeeringer is on a distinguished road
Re: Bumper question

I don't think there's a rule expressly prohibiting interior bumpers, but from the diagram and their stress on "exterior vertexes" I would just go with bumpers on the outer corners.

Having bumpers on the inside would limit the already limited space available because of the 8" on each side rule, so maybe they want to give us as much room to work with but having the compromise of the exterior vertex and 8" on each side.
Reply With Quote
  #30   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2012, 23:01
Joe Johnson's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Joe Johnson Joe Johnson is offline
Engineer at Medrobotics
AKA: Dr. Joe
FRC #0088 (TJ2)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Raynham, MA
Posts: 2,648
Joe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bumper question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz View Post
Quite frankly, I don't know why that interior bumper is outlined as "not OK". The rules say that a bumper must attach to the frame perimeter, which it does, it must be a minimum of 8" on either side of an exterior vertex, can't tell since the drawing is not dimensioned, etc. There do appear to be any rules that prevent interior bumpers. If I find out, I will let you know.
I interpret it this way. The FP does NOT include the inside of the U you are not allowed to have a bumper in there... ...that doesn't count as robot weight. If you want to put bumper in there, knock yourself out, it just has to go in your BOM calculations, weight, ...

Joe J.
__________________
Joseph M. Johnson, Ph.D., P.E.
Mentor
Team #88, TJ2
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 19:53.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi