Go to Post To help keep the kids on top of their game, I remind them that the school board considers a grade of 97 an A , so we can lose 3% of the kids and still be considered excellent. - DonRotolo [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-01-2012, 17:34
Henzado Henzado is offline
Registered User
AKA: Porter Henze
FRC #1891 (Bull Bots)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Meridian, Idaho
Posts: 19
Henzado is on a distinguished road
Re: Bridge question

We made a cheap version using wood, and we had the same problem. however we fixed it by adding 40 pounds to each side.
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-01-2012, 18:13
Brainless96 Brainless96 is offline
Registered User
FRC #0159
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: CO
Posts: 2
Brainless96 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Bridge question

It took 60 lbs on each side to keep the batteries at 28 inches on the better side (the one that will go to 16 in before tipping). With 60 lbs on each side it makes transporting it a real problem so it is not very practical to use this as a final solution. Has anyone come up with a way to use surgical tubing or something like it to fix these problems?
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-01-2012, 18:22
Jim Wilks Jim Wilks is offline
Electrical Engineer
AKA: Jim Wilks
FRC #1360 (Orbit Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Oakville, ON
Posts: 1,186
Jim Wilks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Wilks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Wilks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Wilks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Wilks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Wilks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Wilks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Wilks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Wilks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Wilks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Wilks has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bridge question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brainless96 View Post
It took 60 lbs on each side to keep the batteries at 28 inches on the better side (the one that will go to 16 in before tipping). With 60 lbs on each side it makes transporting it a real problem so it is not very practical to use this as a final solution.
Just make the 60lbs on each side removable and transport as before.
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-01-2012, 19:49
DonRotolo's Avatar
DonRotolo DonRotolo is offline
Back to humble
FRC #0832
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 7,011
DonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bridge question

Adding weight will not make the bridge behave differently.

You need to add a variable force, such as a spring or bungee cord, between the bottom of the bridge and the baseplate, and calibrate that until you get the right motion. Do this on both sides, of course!
__________________

I am N2IRZ - What's your callsign?
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-01-2012, 21:12
indubitably's Avatar
indubitably indubitably is offline
Registered User
AKA: Ryan Guinn
FRC #2338 (Gear It Forward), FRC #1732 (Hilltoppers)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Oswego, IL
Posts: 172
indubitably has a reputation beyond reputeindubitably has a reputation beyond reputeindubitably has a reputation beyond reputeindubitably has a reputation beyond reputeindubitably has a reputation beyond reputeindubitably has a reputation beyond reputeindubitably has a reputation beyond reputeindubitably has a reputation beyond reputeindubitably has a reputation beyond reputeindubitably has a reputation beyond reputeindubitably has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bridge question

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonRotolo View Post
Adding weight will not make the bridge behave differently.

You need to add a variable force, such as a spring or bungee cord, between the bottom of the bridge and the baseplate, and calibrate that until you get the right motion. Do this on both sides, of course!
We tried adding springs, and while it passes the battery tests, it still does not behave as the real ramp would as it falls down slowly. I think we will try adding weight next.
__________________
FRC 1732 (Hilltoppers): Mentor
FRC 2338 (Gear It Forward): Mentor/Alumnus
FRC 4096 (CTRL-Z): Mentor

Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-01-2012, 22:25
Joe Johnson's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Joe Johnson Joe Johnson is offline
Engineer at Medrobotics
AKA: Dr. Joe
FRC #0088 (TJ2)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Raynham, MA
Posts: 2,648
Joe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bridge question

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonRotolo View Post
Adding weight will not make the bridge behave differently.

You need to add a variable force, such as a spring or bungee cord, between the bottom of the bridge and the baseplate, and calibrate that until you get the right motion. Do this on both sides, of course!
I think you are certainly wrong on this count.

Higher weight will make it harder to lift the CG of the bridge (which you certainly will do if you move edge of the bridge down).

It is pretty easy math. The pivot to the CG of the bridge (assuming symmetry) 3" (=barrier width/2 ... actually from the this video it looks like the hinge point may be a bit wider than the barrier, but close enough). The pivot to then edge 41" (44"-3").

If it takes 15lbs at the edge, then the bridge weight must be ~200lbs (15*41/3).

Joe J.
__________________
Joseph M. Johnson, Ph.D., P.E.
Mentor
Team #88, TJ2
Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-01-2012, 14:53
lcoreyl's Avatar
lcoreyl lcoreyl is offline
WittyTitleGen can't link to library
AKA: Milner
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 201
lcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud of
Re: Bridge question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brainless96 View Post
It took 60 lbs on each side to keep the batteries at 28 inches on the better side (the one that will go to 16 in before tipping). With 60 lbs on each side it makes transporting it a real problem so it is not very practical to use this as a final solution. Has anyone come up with a way to use surgical tubing or something like it to fix these problems?
You're likely not going to get performance that is as good as the weight. Also, if you're not tipping the same on each side, then you can fix it by not evenly spacing the 60 lb weights--if you move them around you can get both sides to balance properly.
Reply With Quote
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-01-2012, 16:48
Chi Meson's Avatar
Chi Meson Chi Meson is offline
"Strange and Anti-charmed"
AKA: Brian Chidley
FRC #2168 (Aluminum Falcons)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 272
Chi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud of
Re: Bridge question

Same problem.

I also noticed that our bridge is a bit flimsy. Lots of torsion when two people walk over it. I'll be adding some 2x4 blocks between the 3/4" trapezoidal supports, and from these I'll try hanging weights. I wish I had saved last year's dead batteries!

And Joe Johnson, thank you for the explanation. My first instinct (as a physics teacher) was to claim that it should not matter how massive the bridge was. After checking the actual game pieces, and seeing the hinge points were at the same positions, I was trying to figure out how increasing the mass will matter.

The fact that the hinge points are off-center does indeed mean that the CG will be lifted when the bridge tips up.

I'm only upset that I didn't see it myself
Reply With Quote
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-01-2012, 22:12
Chi Meson's Avatar
Chi Meson Chi Meson is offline
"Strange and Anti-charmed"
AKA: Brian Chidley
FRC #2168 (Aluminum Falcons)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 272
Chi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud of
Re: Bridge question

Man, I am having a hard time getting the bridge to conform to the tipping guidelines.

I made "pockets" out of 2x4 between the support trapezoids, 6 total, into which we can put 6 batteries. they need to be secured so they don't slide out when the bridge tips, and they also need to be quickly installed and removed since those are 6 of our 10 batteries!

These things, being mostly lead, are the densest things we have, the pockets are as far as possible from the pivot, and they still do not get the bridge to go to the magic 28" tipping point (right now we get to 24").

Anyone else with more luck? I figure if we practice on this, we'll only find it easier on the real field.
Reply With Quote
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-01-2012, 22:32
jm2713 jm2713 is offline
Registered User
FRC #2713
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melrose, MA
Posts: 2
jm2713 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Bridge question

We have had the same experience. We had to add >110lbs to get the dynamics demonstrated in the video. Our engineer mentors (I'm not an engineer) tell us it does not matter where the weight is so long as it is evenly distributed relative to the center line. We proved that by testing with the weight all on the center of the bridge versus at the ends - same result in the 2-battery test.

As for the tipping point being different in one direction than the other, we found two problems with our bridge:

1. Note that the non-hinge side of the 2x4s on the bridge itself (not the base) is at the bridge center line, i.e. the 2x4 is off center. The first time we put the bridge on the base we had it backwards, which gave us a very out-of-balance bridge.

2. Pay close attention to the hinge mounting detail in the drawings. Notice that the 2x4 member on the bottom of the bridge itself is not flush with the edge of the hinge plate. We had our's mounted flush. We moved it ~1/2" outboard and got a much closer match of 2-battery test tipping points on the two ends of the bridge.

Now we just need to figure out how to safely mount >100lbs on the bridge in a removable manner.
Reply With Quote
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-01-2012, 20:39
DELurker DELurker is offline
Former Engineering Mentor
AKA: William Lydick
no team (n/a)
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Delaware, US
Posts: 268
DELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant future
Re: Bridge question

We haven't finished calibrating our bridge yet, but we've come up with this to help with the calibration:

With (2) 14.2 lb 6.58" deep (round to 6.6) batteries, the bridge won't tip at 28" from edge to centerline of the bridge, but it will at 30", per field tour video #5. So, that says the torque from the bridge weight is greater than the torque from the battery weight at 28", but less than when at 30". The bridge weight is 3" to one side of the hinge while the battery weight is the distance minus 3" plus half the length of the battery (3.3"), so the center of the battery is 0.3" further from the hinge than the battery edge is from the centerline of the bridge.

Given that, our chart is attached. If you know where your batteries cause the bridge to tip, you should be able to look up (or interpolate) your current deck weight and adjust it to get to the 28"-30" range.

Unless, of course, I messed this up again ...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	BalanceChart.jpg
Views:	73
Size:	31.3 KB
ID:	11449  
Reply With Quote
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-01-2012, 21:19
sandiegodan's Avatar
sandiegodan sandiegodan is offline
FTC Mentor, FRC Inspector
AKA: Dan Glenn
FTC #10092 (Green.Griffins;)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 50
sandiegodan is a name known to allsandiegodan is a name known to allsandiegodan is a name known to allsandiegodan is a name known to allsandiegodan is a name known to allsandiegodan is a name known to all
Re: Bridge question

I just finished our bridge and here is what I came up with.

Looking at the game element drawings, the bridge pivots are 7" apart or 3.5" on each side of center. If you follow the low cost drawings, I think you will find your hinges end up 7" apart. Ours did.

Using the Youtube video the bridge is supposed to stay flat when 2 batteries are placed 28" from center and tilt when they are moved to 30". We weighed 2 batteries at 28 lbs. Working backwards from the 30" number you get:

Weight of the competition bridge (Wcb)*3.5 = 28 * (30-3.5)
or Wcb = 212 lbs.

Looking at our bridge, it began to tilt when the two batteries were at 18":

Wob *3.5 = 28 * (18-3.5)
Wob = 116 lbs.

Ballast required to bring our bridge into spec:
Wcb-Wob = 212-116 = 96 lbs. (equally distributed about the CL of course!)

It's very worthwhile to run through the excersise for the students. It's a very accessable and practical problem.
If anyone has any corrections to this, I'd be happy to hear them (especially if I've missed something!) and if you need any help with the equations or how I arrived at them, I'd be glad to explain what I did.

Thank you and good luck!
__________________
Dan Glenn
2015-16 FRC Chairman, San Diego Regional Planning Committee
2016 FRC Inspector, Orange County (LRI), Los Angeles, Carson Division
2015 FRC Inspector, Inland Empire (LRI), Central Valley, Los Angeles, Galileo Division
2015 FTC Mentor 10092 Green.Griffins; R&D Robotics Education
2014 FRC Inspector, Inland Empire, San Diego(LRI), Archimedes Division
2012-15 FTC Mentor Team 6565 Stuffed Dragons & 8489 Green Griffins Boys and Girls Club
2013 FRC Inspector, Central Valley, San Diego(LRI), Los Angeles, Inland Empire, Galileo Division
2012 FRC Inspector, San Diego, Los Angeles, Central Valley, Newton Division
2009-12 FRC Mentor Team 1622 Spyder Poway HS
2007-08 FRC Mentor Team 2658 Pedestrian Rancho Bernardo HS
Reply With Quote
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-01-2012, 21:26
jdunston94 jdunston94 is offline
Registered User
FRC #3357 (C.O.M.E.T.S.)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: US
Posts: 71
jdunston94 is a jewel in the roughjdunston94 is a jewel in the roughjdunston94 is a jewel in the roughjdunston94 is a jewel in the rough
Re: Bridge question

surgical tubing. plain simple light. that allowed ours to behave quiet nicely.
Reply With Quote
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2012, 21:31
Chi Meson's Avatar
Chi Meson Chi Meson is offline
"Strange and Anti-charmed"
AKA: Brian Chidley
FRC #2168 (Aluminum Falcons)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 272
Chi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud of
Re: Bridge question

We got two 50-lb flat weights. At 14" diameter, they fit nicely between the two center support trapezoids. We put a 2x4 block across with just enough room to fit the weights without slopping around.

A carriage bolt that goes down from the top of the bridge, through the hole in the weights, and through the 2x4, holds them in place. With a wing-nut, the bolts are easily removed when we have to store the bridge.

Thanks to our Pit Captain, Tulsa, for working this problem through.
Reply With Quote
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2012, 21:39
Jim Wilks Jim Wilks is offline
Electrical Engineer
AKA: Jim Wilks
FRC #1360 (Orbit Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Oakville, ON
Posts: 1,186
Jim Wilks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Wilks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Wilks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Wilks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Wilks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Wilks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Wilks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Wilks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Wilks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Wilks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Wilks has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bridge question

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdunston94 View Post
surgical tubing. plain simple light. that allowed ours to behave quiet nicely.
Installed where, how?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 18:08.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi