Go to Post Sounds more like competition for Kentucky Fried Chicken - "I'll have the 3-piece dinner, a Winglet and two thighs..." - Dick Linn [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-01-2012, 20:54
IKE's Avatar
IKE IKE is offline
Not so Custom User Title
AKA: Isaac Rife
no team (N/A)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,153
IKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond repute
Basketball Strategy Question

While reading the rules of a game called "Basketball", I noticed that there is a "chokehold" strategy. If you made a team full of 3 pt. shooters (3 or more of the 5), then in theory, they wouldn't even need to really play defense other than not let the other team score 3 point shots. They could hire this guy, and how could they loose?

I also found this article:The Greatest 3 Pt. Shooters. Most of these guys, I have barely heard of Honestly, I know Larry Bird, Reggie Miller, and have heard of the one guy from the Suns.

Any thoughts on why this strategy doesn't dominate the NBA?
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-01-2012, 21:07
Cem8301's Avatar
Cem8301 Cem8301 is offline
Carolyn
AKA: student president
FRC #3413 (Mad Cows)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Coppell, Texas
Posts: 31
Cem8301 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Basketball Strategy Question

3 pointers are a lot harder to make when there is a defense. I think that if a particular player is know for his 3-pointers he will be more heavily guarded along the rim.

Back to robots... defense is something that we will have to worry about. If your team can only make shots from a particular spot on the field, other robots can make it more difficult for your robot to get there and impede your shot. Interesting concept though... I think we can learn a lot from real basketball!
__________________
The steaks are high. Prepare for udder destruction!! <3 Mad 3:O's
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-01-2012, 22:28
Grim Tuesday's Avatar
Grim Tuesday Grim Tuesday is offline
Registered User
AKA: Simon Bohn
FRC #0639 (Code Red)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Baltimore MD (JHU)
Posts: 1,607
Grim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Basketball Strategy Question

I feel like this thread is a hint as to what 33 is doing, and they think they've found a chokehold strategy.
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-01-2012, 23:13
IKE's Avatar
IKE IKE is offline
Not so Custom User Title
AKA: Isaac Rife
no team (N/A)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,153
IKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Basketball Strategy Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grim Tuesday View Post
I feel like this thread is a hint as to what 33 is doing, and they think they've found a chokehold strategy.
No, not a hint. Merely some thoughts that have been bugging me a bit. Watching basketball, it seems that the 2 point shot is valued significantly over the 3 pt. shot. Most of the big money guys are inside players playing the short game in basketball (dunks and lay-ups). Some of the greats listed in the "3 pt." article cited guys shooting aaround 40 to 50%. Since the value is 50% higher (3/2), then one would think that the 2 pt. shot would need to be on the order of 60 to 75% in order to be the smart play. Looking through some NBA stats, I find that a FG% around 60% is usually considered very good, and a 3FG% above 40% is also considered good. My guess is that the re-bound on a missed shot is likely gained by the shooter more often with the close shots. This additional gain would likely be the reason that primary scoring and money go to guys playing the close game.
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-01-2012, 23:43
Basel A's Avatar
Basel A Basel A is offline
It's pronounced Basl with a soft s
AKA: @BaselThe2nd
FRC #3322 (Eagle Imperium)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 1,941
Basel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Basketball Strategy Question

I would suspect that 3-pointers these days are usually taken only when they're open or minimally defended. That situation happens when you have the inside guys who leverage basketball's anti-defence rules going straight for the basket. If you can pull more than one player to your inside guy, then you'll have someone open on the outside. The inside player's other purpose is to rebound, which I think you pointed out, though the most valuable inside players can score as well. I agree with you to some degree: an open 3-pointer is always better than an open mid-range jumper and driving the basket is over-rated.
__________________
Team 2337 | 2009-2012 | Student
Team 3322 | 2014-Present | College Student
“Be excellent in everything you do and the results will just happen.”
-Paul Copioli
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-01-2012, 23:57
Unsung FIRST Hero
Karthik Karthik is offline
VEX Robotics GDC Chairman
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,347
Karthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Basketball Strategy Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by IKE View Post
No, not a hint. Merely some thoughts that have been bugging me a bit. Watching basketball, it seems that the 2 point shot is valued significantly over the 3 pt. shot. Most of the big money guys are inside players playing the short game in basketball (dunks and lay-ups). Some of the greats listed in the "3 pt." article cited guys shooting aaround 40 to 50%. Since the value is 50% higher (3/2), then one would think that the 2 pt. shot would need to be on the order of 60 to 75% in order to be the smart play. Looking through some NBA stats, I find that a FG% around 60% is usually considered very good, and a 3FG% above 40% is also considered good. My guess is that the re-bound on a missed shot is likely gained by the shooter more often with the close shots. This additional gain would likely be the reason that primary scoring and money go to guys playing the close game.
I could write a paper on this subject, but I'll do my best to explain simply.

The 3 point shot is undervalued in the NBA; more specifically, NBA players have a strange obsession with the long 2 pointer, with has lowest expected value of any play in basketball. That being said, finding players who can shoot the 3 at 40% or better in game situations with defense is difficult. There were 31 players who shot at that rate last season, but remember this is not with them mad bombing 3's at all costs. This their percentage based on only shooting what the player perceives to be a "good shot". If a team were to employ the strategy you suggest, their 3 point percentages would drop dramatically.

There are a lot more factors that go into this, but basically, teams should probably shoot more three pointers, however, simply relying on the three point shot sends you into risky territory.
__________________
:: Karthik Kanagasabapathy ::
"Enthusiasm is one of the most powerful engines of success. When you do a thing, do it with all your might. Put your whole soul into it. Stamp it with your own personality. Be active, be energetic, be enthusiastic and faithful and you will accomplish your object. Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm" -- R.W. Emerson
My TEDx Talk - The Subtle Secrets of Success
Full disclosure: I work for IFI and VEX Robotics, and am the Chairman of the VEX Robotics and VEX IQ Game Design Committees
.
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-01-2012, 00:02
Alpha Beta's Avatar
Alpha Beta Alpha Beta is offline
Strategy, Scouting, and LabVIEW
AKA: Mr. Aaron Bailey
FRC #1986 (Team Titanium)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Lee's Summit, Missouri
Posts: 763
Alpha Beta has a reputation beyond reputeAlpha Beta has a reputation beyond reputeAlpha Beta has a reputation beyond reputeAlpha Beta has a reputation beyond reputeAlpha Beta has a reputation beyond reputeAlpha Beta has a reputation beyond reputeAlpha Beta has a reputation beyond reputeAlpha Beta has a reputation beyond reputeAlpha Beta has a reputation beyond reputeAlpha Beta has a reputation beyond reputeAlpha Beta has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Basketball Strategy Question

The best 3 point play in the NBA is driving to the rim and getting fouled while making the shot. Of course if a player is fouled while making a 3, it could be a 4 point play.

As far as robots go I'm hoping to sucker some defensive bots into giving me a 6 point play. Now, what's the best protected place on the field to shoot from if I want some "accidental" contact...
__________________
Regional Wins: 2016(KC), 2015(St. Louis, Queen City), 2014(Central Illinois, KC), 2013(Hub City, KC, Oklahoma City), 2012(KC, St. Louis), 2011(Colorado), 2010(North Star)
Regional Chairman's Award: 2014(Central Illinois), 2009(10,000 Lakes)
Engineering Inspiration: 2016(Smoky Mountain), 2012(Kansas City), 2011(Denver)
Dean's List Finalist 2016(Jacob S), 2014(Cameron L), 2013(Jay U), 2012(Laura S), 2011(Dominic A), 2010(Collin R)
Woodie Flowers Finalist 2013 (Aaron Bailey)
Championships: Sub-Division Champion (2016), Finalist (2013, 2010), Semifinalist (2014), Quaterfinalist (2015, 2012, 2011)
Other Official Awards: Gracious Professionalism (2013) Entrepreneurship (2013), Quality (2015, 2015, 2013), Engineering Excellence (Champs 2013, 2012), Website (2011), Industrial Design (Archimedes/Tesla 2016, 2016, 2015, Newton 2014, 2013, 2011), Innovation in Control (2014, Champs 2010, 2010, 2008, 2008), Imagery (2009), Regional Finalist (2016, 2015, 2008)
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-01-2012, 00:30
mwtidd's Avatar
mwtidd mwtidd is offline
Registered User
AKA: mike
FRC #0319 (Big Bad Bob)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 714
mwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Basketball Strategy Question

I think there are two key differences between basketball and this years game.

With regards to the 3 pt shot, in basketball, it is significantly more difficult to shoot than a 2pt shot. Where as in this years game there is little difference. Actually in this game if you decided on an angle you wanted the ball to fall into the hoop at, the 2 point shot would have to be taken from a greater distance.

The second difference is rebounding. For this I will refer to it as the long shot rather than the 3 pt shot, because I think it is applicable. In basketball you take the long shot, assuming that you will be able to rebound it at about 50%. So the value of 3 pt shots is not just 3 * attempts * %, but rather 3 * attempts * % + 2 * attempts * .5 * 2 pt FG%

I am curious as to what people think the various stats would be for shooting from the top of the key vs the bottom of the key. And also how many rebounds can be made. I imagine a team that can shoot from the top of the key and cross the barrier, paired with 2 teams that rebound well would be a stronger alliance than 3 robots that shoot 66% from the bottom of the key
__________________
"Never let your schooling interfere with your education" -Mark Twain
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-01-2012, 17:12
wilhitern1's Avatar
wilhitern1 wilhitern1 is offline
Sr. Systems Analyst / BRM
AKA: Neal Wilhite
FRC #1225 (Gorillas)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Hendersinville, NC
Posts: 147
wilhitern1 is a name known to allwilhitern1 is a name known to allwilhitern1 is a name known to allwilhitern1 is a name known to allwilhitern1 is a name known to allwilhitern1 is a name known to all
Re: Basketball Strategy Question

How do you do you expect to account for the following fact:
Of the three balls we got, none are the same weight, density center, or compactability?
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-01-2012, 18:04
Bob Steele's Avatar
Bob Steele Bob Steele is offline
Professional Steamacrit Hunter
AKA: Bob Steele
FRC #1983 (Skunk Works Robotics)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 1,539
Bob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Basketball Strategy Question

I would be curious to see how human basketball would be played if you could take shots from the foul line without any defense... I have a huge feeling that the game would be played from the foul line. In human basketball, defense is totally different... and there is only one ball...

Before robotics, I played and coached basketball for quite a long time... long enough to see a player from the high school I taught and coached at to play in the NBA finals. Defense is what dictates human basketball... a team uses 3 point shots to open up the middle so they can score inside... if defense were played on 3 point shooters one of two things would happen... first that player would drive to the basket... and either shoot or dish off.. or two... that player would find a player closer to the basket under less defensive pressure to pass to and take the shot.

In human basketball... a defense does not want to play defense on the 3 point shooter... bad things happen... you commit a foul and the player gets 3 foul shots.. it also means one on one defense... the closer you are to the basket the tighter the offensive players are together... one defender can play multiple offensive players... easier to double up...

Frankly if basketball where played like our game... it would be a simple issue of getting the ball to someone at the foul line... and then turning around and shooting it without ANY defensive pressure...
In the NBA... with a few notable exceptions...(primarily inside players...) ALL players have better shot percentages from foul shots than court shots...

In our game... there is not even any advantage from shooting outside..
(No 3-point rule)

Someone asked why a player would take a long-non 3-pointer in an NBA game... they would because they were under less defensive pressure... simple as that..
defense dictates where the shot is taken...
__________________
Raisbeck Aviation High School TEAM 1983 - Seattle, Washington
Las Vegas 07 WINNER w/ 1425/254...Seattle 08 WINNER w/ 2046/949.. Oregon 09 WINNER w/1318/2635..SEA 10 RCA ..Spokane 12 WINNER w/2122/4082 and RCA...Central Wa 13 WINNER w/1425/753..Seattle 13 WINNER w/948/492 & RCA ..Spokane 13 WINNER w/2471/4125.. Spokane 14 - DCA --Auburn 14 - WINNER w/1318/4960..District CMP 14 WINNER w/1318/2907, District CMA.. CMP 14 Newton Finalist w 971/341/3147 ... Auburn Mountainview 15 WINNER w/1318/3049 - Mt Vernon 15 WINNER w/1318/4654 - Philomath 15 WINNER w/955/847 -District CMP 15 WINNER w/955/2930 & District CMA -CMP Newton -Industrial Design Award

  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-01-2012, 18:08
Koko Ed's Avatar
Koko Ed Koko Ed is offline
Serial Volunteer
AKA: Ed Patterson
FRC #0191 (X-Cats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Rochester,NY
Posts: 22,949
Koko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Basketball Strategy Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Steele View Post
I would be curious to see how human basketball would be played if you could take shots from the foul line without any defense...
Shaq would die a very poor man....
__________________
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-01-2012, 18:18
Lil' Lavery Lil' Lavery is offline
TSIMFD
AKA: Sean Lavery
FRC #1712 (DAWGMA)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 6,655
Lil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Lil' Lavery
Re: Basketball Strategy Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karthik View Post
I could write a paper on this subject, but I'll do my best to explain simply.

The 3 point shot is undervalued in the NBA; more specifically, NBA players have a strange obsession with the long 2 pointer, with has lowest expected value of any play in basketball. That being said, finding players who can shoot the 3 at 40% or better in game situations with defense is difficult. There were 31 players who shot at that rate last season, but remember this is not with them mad bombing 3's at all costs. This their percentage based on only shooting what the player perceives to be a "good shot". If a team were to employ the strategy you suggest, their 3 point percentages would drop dramatically.

There are a lot more factors that go into this, but basically, teams should probably shoot more three pointers, however, simply relying on the three point shot sends you into risky territory.
I won't pretend that I watch basketball as much as I presume you do, but my interpretation of the "mid-range jumper" is that it's often the open play. It's usually what the defense is most willing to give up, when push comes to shove. They won't give the higher probability shot or lay-up close range, and they won't give the higher scoring 3-pointer. So the ball handler takes what's given to them.
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-01-2012, 20:18
Chris Hibner's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Chris Hibner Chris Hibner is offline
Eschewing Obfuscation Since 1990
AKA: Lars Kamen's Roadie
FRC #0051 (Wings of Fire)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1997
Location: Canton, MI
Posts: 1,488
Chris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Basketball Strategy Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by IKE View Post
While reading the rules of a game called "Basketball", I noticed that there is a "chokehold" strategy. If you made a team full of 3 pt. shooters (3 or more of the 5), then in theory, they wouldn't even need to really play defense other than not let the other team score 3 point shots. They could hire this guy, and how could they loose?

I also found this article:The Greatest 3 Pt. Shooters. Most of these guys, I have barely heard of Honestly, I know Larry Bird, Reggie Miller, and have heard of the one guy from the Suns.

Any thoughts on why this strategy doesn't dominate the NBA?
In the NBA, you are correct. Rick Pitino had a lot of Kentucky teams ranked #1 consistently using the 3 pointer as a primary shot. John Beilein has been trying to do it at Michigan.

I've thought about that a lot. If you are a believer in expected value, the three point shot is a much better option in basketball. I think the problem is: 1) "momentum" affects the human psyche enough that a few empty trips down the court (and the resulting point deficit) makes the human players a bit jumpy and 2) humans shooting baskets are prone to hot and cold streaks (i.e. lack of repeatability) makes the strategy dominant in some games and awful in others.
__________________
-
An ounce of perception is worth a pound of obscure.
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-01-2012, 22:02
Unsung FIRST Hero
Karthik Karthik is offline
VEX Robotics GDC Chairman
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,347
Karthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Basketball Strategy Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lil' Lavery View Post
I won't pretend that I watch basketball as much as I presume you do, but my interpretation of the "mid-range jumper" is that it's often the open play. It's usually what the defense is most willing to give up, when push comes to shove. They won't give the higher probability shot or lay-up close range, and they won't give the higher scoring 3-pointer. So the ball handler takes what's given to them.
Correct, since the mid-range shot has the lowest expected value, it's also the shot the defense is most willing to leave open. As a result some offensive players settle for this shot, instead of fighting for a better (read: higher expected value) shot. It's been driving coaches, teammates and fans crazy since the creation of the three point line.
__________________
:: Karthik Kanagasabapathy ::
"Enthusiasm is one of the most powerful engines of success. When you do a thing, do it with all your might. Put your whole soul into it. Stamp it with your own personality. Be active, be energetic, be enthusiastic and faithful and you will accomplish your object. Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm" -- R.W. Emerson
My TEDx Talk - The Subtle Secrets of Success
Full disclosure: I work for IFI and VEX Robotics, and am the Chairman of the VEX Robotics and VEX IQ Game Design Committees
.
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-01-2012, 22:22
pfreivald's Avatar
pfreivald pfreivald is offline
Registered User
AKA: Patrick Freivald
FRC #1551 (The Grapes of Wrath)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Naples, NY
Posts: 2,304
pfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Basketball Strategy Question

Interesting read. I love games, but not so much basketball. (I'm aware there are baskets and balls involved, but that's about it.) Thanks for the topic!

And Karthik, are you MCing FLR again this year?
__________________
Patrick Freivald -- Mentor
Team 1551
"The Grapes of Wrath"
Bausch & Lomb, PTC Corporation, and Naples High School

I write books, too!
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:45.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi