|
Re: CIM Motor Sacrifice
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether
What do you mean by 50% "power" in this context?
|
Ah, I see I was a little more vague than I intended to be.
Our intent is to run the motors as close to (Max No Load RPM/2), technically at or near the motors maximum power point. So, my statement was termed incorrectly. I should have simply said 50% of max RPM.
Thanks for calling me on this. Clarifying this point does make a HUGE difference.
__________________
CalGames 2009 Autonomous Champion Award winner
Sacramento 2010 Creativity in Design winner, Sacramento 2010 Quarter finalist
2011 Sacramento Finalist, 2011 Madtown Engineering Inspiration Award.
2012 Sacramento Semi-Finals, 2012 Sacramento Innovation in Control Award, 2012 SVR Judges Award.
2012 CalGames Autonomous Challenge Award winner ($$$).
2014 2X Rockwell Automation: Innovation in Control Award (CVR and SAC). Curie Division Gracious Professionalism Award.
2014 Capital City Classic Winner AND Runner Up. Madtown Throwdown: Runner up.
2015 Innovation in Control Award, Sacramento.
2016 Chezy Champs Finalist, 2016 MTTD Finalist
|
We may be changing cheese heads for cheesy poofs, but in the imortal words of Gen. MacArthur "we shall return" (team # 2437) - cdebo [more] 
17-01-2012, 09:48
Hybrid Mode
