|
|
|
 Ah AndyMark and your $2 a piece pool noodles - mlantry [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| Ah AndyMark and your $2 a piece pool noodles - mlantry [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NI Update Service - do it?, or not?
I'm not an official word from FIRST, but I suspect that it doesn't matter either way. You are not using the sb-RIO product, so the first should have no impact, and I have no details on the second, but it generally means that someone internal was able to find a better way to secure some runtime. Again, it probably doesn't have much impact since LV isn't typically a target for malicious SW.
Greg McKaskle 
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
