Go to Post We're still not ready for 2012.... - AdamHeard [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
View Poll Results: What is more important?
Shooting Basket Balls 15 51.72%
Balancing Three Robots 7 24.14%
Having a Consistent Shooter and Not Balancing Three Robots 5 17.24%
Being able to Balance Three Robots But Not able to Shoot Consistently 2 6.90%
Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-01-2012, 16:56
Christian Z's Avatar
Christian Z Christian Z is offline
Registered User
FRC #2557 (Sota Bots)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 10
Christian Z is an unknown quantity at this point
Which one is more important?

This polls purpose is to see what strategy is more important when it comes to focusing on balancing or shooting basket balls.
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-01-2012, 17:20
farmersvilleRob's Avatar
farmersvilleRob farmersvilleRob is offline
Registered User
FRC #4084
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Farmersville
Posts: 172
farmersvilleRob is infamous around these parts
Re: Which one is more important?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Christian Z View Post
This polls purpose is to see what strategy is more important when it comes to focusing on balancing or shooting basket balls.
Is it too late for Strategy focus?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	yo dawg robot.jpg
Views:	73
Size:	117.7 KB
ID:	11552  
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-01-2012, 17:21
DallonF DallonF is offline
Registered User
FRC #2403 (Plasma Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 11
DallonF is a jewel in the roughDallonF is a jewel in the roughDallonF is a jewel in the roughDallonF is a jewel in the rough
Re: Which one is more important?

Both are important, but consider that balancing three robots is completely unneccessary until Elimination (it's worth exactly as many points as two robots before then), and that it requires the cooperation and ability of two other teams. Basketballs, on the other hand, can score points for your team even if you have to pull their weight.

@farmersvilleRob: Oh no - balancing minibots!?
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-01-2012, 17:57
Bob Steele's Avatar
Bob Steele Bob Steele is offline
Professional Steamacrit Hunter
AKA: Bob Steele
FRC #1983 (Skunk Works Robotics)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 1,516
Bob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Which one is more important?

I guess my question would be

Which one is more important for what?

high qual score
getting picked
winning at regional
winning at CMP


This year these four things could be quite a bit different.

for example. With the possibility of additional points added at CMP for a 3 robot dance on the bridge.... it really makes winning at CMP and during regionals different...but most years you have to look at CMP winning as different than regionals because of the across the board quality of robots at CMP....

I wonder if teams will worry more about coopertition points or just put on a good display on the field in the hopes that teams notice and pick them.

This is the first year where the coopertition points could put a less than optimal robot in the top 8.... what I mean here is that the top 8 alliances are 50% weighted for abilities that have little or nothing to do with winning the elimination rounds. Of course being able to balance can help in the eliminations.... but balancing with an opposing alliance robot (which is a different skill in some ways than balancing alliance robots..) counts for nothing in eliminations...

Robots which dominate in points scoring on the field will dominate the elimination rounds... it behooves all teams to do a really good job of scouting. I believe that looking at qualification rankings will NOT be a good way to do a pick... in the past this has also been true but this year it is especially true.
__________________
Raisbeck Aviation High School TEAM 1983 - Seattle, Washington
Las Vegas 07 WINNER w/ 1425/254...Seattle 08 WINNER w/ 2046/949.. Oregon 09 WINNER w/1318/2635..SEA 10 RCA ..Spokane 12 WINNER w/2122/4082 and RCA...Central Wa 13 WINNER w/1425/753..Seattle 13 WINNER w/948/492 & RCA ..Spokane 13 WINNER w/2471/4125.. Spokane 14 - DCA --Auburn 14 - WINNER w/1318/4960..District CMP 14 WINNER w/1318/2907, District CMA.. CMP 14 Newton Finalist w 971/341/3147 ... Auburn Mountainview 15 WINNER w/1318/3049 - Mt Vernon 15 WINNER w/1318/4654 - Philomath 15 WINNER w/955/847 -District CMP 15 WINNER w/955/2930 & District CMA -CMP Newton -Industrial Design Award

Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:42.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi