|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Wood vs. Steel Barrier
I just went back through the field drawings to look at how the steel barrier is made, and a 4x6 steel tube might be an accurate and relatively easy to find substitute for some teams. I believe we have some 4"x6" or at least 4"x4" tube sitting on the Material Rack at my job, I will try to get some dimensions of the corner radii to compare.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Wood vs. Steel Barrier
That is true that team test there prototypes onto he wooden barriers and are successful but I can bet that some of those team will have a problem at their district/regional competitions. That is why I am telling my team don't rely on the success of the wooden barrier.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Wood vs. Steel Barrier
We covered our barrier with aluminum flashing to simulate the coefficient of friction and rounded edge in an affordable manner -- it made no difference to our drive train...
But yeah, a lesson I had to learn a half-dozen times in FIRST and am now paranoid about is this: never engineer anything so that it barely works. All values are nominal, and assume that if they're off, they'll be off in a manner disadvantageous to your robot. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|