|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Driving long?
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Driving long?
We decided to go for wide for two reasons: Firstly, it makes balancing easier with three robots. Sure, you can go for long and rotate on the bridge, but that takes time. What if you could have scored 6 extra points in that time? Our second conclusion was that balls would be a tough commodity in this game, so it was essential that we were able to collect them easily. Thus, a larger surface for the collector was necessary, and we put it on our wide side. We're keeping our CoG low, so we can still go over the barrier.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Driving long?
Less than a second for us, and we can drive sideways afterward. I wouldn't recommend it without a zero-turn-radius robot.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Driving long?
We figure balancing 3 robots is going to be a lot harder than some people think - especially since no one is going to be trying it until the elimination matches. You'll see a lot of teams try for 3 and not get any bonus points because of it, being beaten by people going for two who get it because they've had a lot of practice doing that.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|