|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Poor man's omnis (idea)
A simple idea is to wrap the wheel in zip-ties parallel to the axis of rotation. The zip-ties allow the wheel to slide side-to-side while maintaining some forward/backward traction. It's an old-school trick.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poor man's omnis (idea)
Really? That's so cool! Thanks!
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Poor man's omnis (idea)
The main reason omnis make it easier to turn is that they have a lower coefficient of friction across the wheel than along the wheel. This means that anything that makes slipping side to side easier than forward and back could be considered a "poor man's omni."
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Poor man's omnis (idea)
We had originally planned to use the slick wheels from 2010. We found that they worked very well on carpet, but on the plastic bridge, the robot became uncontrollable. Slick wheels != PMOs.
I'd presume the same for Lunacy wheels. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|