|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
I was just wondering if you are concerned about the bridge manipulator blocking/separating your team number?
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
Hrrm..... We haven't really thought about that before, however because that part will only be in its lowered position for a short amount of time, I don't think we need to be concerned about splitting the number. If that part were stay down for a large part o the match, I would be concerned about it covering the numbers.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
Were back from reveal and we finally got some video of our shooter operating in a room with a high ceiling: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxjSHXYgjiQ
But, In this video the shooter is limited to 6 volts by software, the only thing I know is that it is spinning at or below 4000 rpm. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
I like the robot, well done. However, doesn't the two part mechanism for putting down the bridge violate the single appendage rule? I might not be seeing it, but it doesn't appear to be one contiguous appendage outside the frame. If this indeed is the case, a quick fix might be just to tie a cable/string from one side to the other so that they are "contiguous".
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
Ok, now that the robot is done here is pictures of it all put together:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Final weight: 118.8 Pounds More picures in this web album: https://picasaweb.google.com/1080665...eat=directlink Last edited by klmx30302 : 23-02-2012 at 17:58. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|