Go to Post The main use of Chiefdelphi is self expression of what FIRST means to you. - Koko Ed [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2003, 13:04
Lauren Hafford Lauren Hafford is offline
Registered User
#0159 (Alpine Robotics)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 53
Lauren Hafford is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to Lauren Hafford
Mousebots???

Are mousebots/tetherbots allowed? They didn't say anything about it at kickoff......

"Rule M18: Mechanisms or components that present an obious risk of entanlement are not allowed" - but i thought that this rule was here last year and there were tons of allowable mousebots.

lauren

Last edited by Lauren Hafford : 04-01-2003 at 13:09.
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2003, 13:08
Doug's Avatar
Doug Doug is offline
Registered User
#0122 (Nasa Knights)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: York County
Posts: 63
Doug is an unknown quantity at this point
well I guess you could have a mouse bot but unless it is going to knock over stacks it would be useless
the entire robot has to be ontop of the ramp to get the 25 points
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2003, 14:14
Norm M.'s Avatar
Norm M. Norm M. is offline
Registered User
#0525
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cedar Falls, Iowa
Posts: 32
Norm M. will become famous soon enough
Not on top

One thing that I heard, in the discussion about stacking one robot on top of the other: If the lower robot is touching the ramp, then it is not in scoring position.

My take on it (I still can't download the rules ) Is that there is no reason for a mouse or tape unit. It would almost assure that you couldn't score the 25 points for being on top of the ramp.
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2003, 14:44
Katie Reynolds Katie Reynolds is offline
Registered User
no team (NEW Apple Corps)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Appleton, WI, USA
Posts: 2,598
Katie Reynolds has a reputation beyond reputeKatie Reynolds has a reputation beyond reputeKatie Reynolds has a reputation beyond reputeKatie Reynolds has a reputation beyond reputeKatie Reynolds has a reputation beyond reputeKatie Reynolds has a reputation beyond reputeKatie Reynolds has a reputation beyond reputeKatie Reynolds has a reputation beyond reputeKatie Reynolds has a reputation beyond reputeKatie Reynolds has a reputation beyond reputeKatie Reynolds has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Katie Reynolds Send a message via Yahoo to Katie Reynolds
Re: Not on top

Quote:
Originally posted by Norm M.
One thing that I heard, in the discussion about stacking one robot on top of the other: If the lower robot is touching the ramp, then it is not in scoring position.

My take on it (I still can't download the rules ) Is that there is no reason for a mouse or tape unit. It would almost assure that you couldn't score the 25 points for being on top of the ramp.
That was my thought exactly.

I just sumbitted a question on the FRC Forums about top of the ramp scoring ... whether or not your ENTIRE robot had to be on top or not - From what was said during the braodcast, I am assuming so. We'll see!

- Katie
__________________
Team #93 - NEW Apple Corps
Student - 2001-2004
Team #857 - Superior Roboworks
Mentor - 2006-2009
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2003, 14:52
Ryan Curry Ryan Curry is offline
Registered User
FRC #0030 (FURY)
Team Role: Driver
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Lincroft, NJ
Posts: 71
Ryan Curry is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Ryan Curry
The manual says the entire robot has to be on top of the ramp.

-Rc
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2003, 16:02
Ryan Dognaux's Avatar
Ryan Dognaux Ryan Dognaux is offline
Back Home in Indiana
FRC #4329 (Lutheran Roboteers)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 2,675
Ryan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Ryan Dognaux
They wouldn't be entirely useless, especially if you could drive them manually, I think Delco Remy's team had one last year. Anyways, my point is, you could guard your multiplier stack while knocking over the opponent's stack.
__________________
Ryan Dognaux :: Last Name Pronounced 'Doane Yo'
Team 234 Alum: 2002 - 2005 :: Purdue FIRST Member: 2006 - 2009
Team 1646 Mentor: 2007 - 2009 :: Team 357 Mentor: 2009 - 2012
Team 4329 Mentor: Current
STL Off-Season Event: www.gatewayroboticschallenge.com
Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2003, 17:01
roboticscom13's Avatar
roboticscom13 roboticscom13 is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 46
roboticscom13 is an unknown quantity at this point
If a tether was made that doesnt mean that it has to stay on the field it could get re sucked up at the end to avoid that rule with the top of the ramp.....

Last edited by Brandon Martus : 04-01-2003 at 17:07.
Reply With Quote
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2003, 17:36
Bduggan04's Avatar
Bduggan04 Bduggan04 is offline
I bent my wookie...
AKA: Bryan Duggan
#0027 (Team Rush)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Clarkston, MI
Posts: 290
Bduggan04 will become famous soon enoughBduggan04 will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally posted by Doug
well I guess you could have a mouse bot but unless it is going to knock over stacks it would be useless
the entire robot has to be ontop of the ramp to get the 25 points
If you used a mouse to push down bins, they'd just fall back on the mouse.
Reply With Quote
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2003, 18:24
roboticscom13's Avatar
roboticscom13 roboticscom13 is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 46
roboticscom13 is an unknown quantity at this point
Not if you hit the bins with enough speed. The momentum will carry over and knock it slightly off balance then making it sway which would help in the tipping proccess.
Reply With Quote
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2003, 18:30
Noah's Avatar
Noah Noah is offline
Code Monkey
#0861 (The Gondobots)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Venice, California
Posts: 139
Noah has a spectacular aura aboutNoah has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via AIM to Noah
Quote:
An additional 25 points will be awarded to each robot that is touching only the top of the platform at the end of the match.
If you can figure out how to get your mouse on top of the bridge and then levitate your robot, your a better man than I am.
__________________
"It's broken? NOOAAHH!!! This is your doing, isn't it!"

"We can fix it in the software!"
"It's a BROKEN GEAR!"
Reply With Quote
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2003, 18:34
Jnadke Jnadke is offline
Go Badgers!
#0093
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Appleton, WI
Posts: 775
Jnadke is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Jnadke Send a message via AIM to Jnadke Send a message via Yahoo to Jnadke
Re: Re: Not on top

Quote:
Originally posted by Katie Reynolds
That was my thought exactly.

I just sumbitted a question on the FRC Forums about top of the ramp scoring ... whether or not your ENTIRE robot had to be on top or not - From what was said during the braodcast, I am assuming so. We'll see!

- Katie

The manual already says, "An additional 25 points will be awarded to each robot that is touching only the top of the platform at the end of a match."


The platform is 4 feet wide and 12 feet long. If you can't fit your robot on that... then tough luck. Besides, the robots are only supposed to be 3 feet maximum to begin with (you could drop down, but still you can fit your robot the width-way).
__________________
The best moments of our lives fall in two categories: those that did happen and those that did not.
Reply With Quote
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2003, 18:39
AJ Quick's Avatar
AJ Quick AJ Quick is offline
Your Attention Please
FRC #0006 (CogSquad)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 464
AJ Quick has a spectacular aura aboutAJ Quick has a spectacular aura about
This would have been a great thing to be able to do, as many teams decided to do last year to get their robots in the scoring area. We were considering it, but now that we reviewed the rules it isn't allowed which makes it somewhat bad... yet for the other teams it give an advantage.
__________________
-AJ Quick (Alum on Team 6)
http://www.HHSRobotics.com/

Place your attention entirely on my voice and try to ignore all the others. It is important to be able to focus on a single source of information while blocking out all the other things competing for your attention.
Reply With Quote
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-01-2003, 00:54
EStokely's Avatar
EStokely EStokely is offline
Registered User
AKA: Eric Stokely
FRC #0360 (Revolution)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 195
EStokely has a reputation beyond reputeEStokely has a reputation beyond reputeEStokely has a reputation beyond reputeEStokely has a reputation beyond reputeEStokely has a reputation beyond reputeEStokely has a reputation beyond reputeEStokely has a reputation beyond reputeEStokely has a reputation beyond reputeEStokely has a reputation beyond reputeEStokely has a reputation beyond reputeEStokely has a reputation beyond repute
OK let me start by saying that the whole tether thing is a real sore point with me.

That said...now, Since the wording appears the same as last year, Mouse Bots should be legal. What good are they? They can run under a 13 inch bar, they can knock over stacks of bins, they can allow a robot to do two things at once.

At the 10 second mark, if the platform is the goal, you reel in the mouse bot like a hose reel. Otherwise you just leave it out there.

I am VERY VERY curious how the engineers are going to rule on tethers this year.
I hope they spell out exactly what will and will not be allowed BEFORE the robots ship.
There, I feel better
__________________
Eric Stokely
Team 360 The Revolution, past mentor of 258 The Sea Dawgs
Experience is what you get when you don't get what you want.
Reply With Quote
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-01-2003, 01:07
Teedoff101 Teedoff101 is offline
Registered User
#0992 (Oakwood Robotics)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 45
Teedoff101 is an unknown quantity at this point
At the kickoff in SoCal today, we got a call from Woody where we could ask him questions and he stated that the entire robot must be on the platform to get the 25 pts. Also, what use would a mousebot be in this game? Can't use it in autonomus mode (hopefull got that right...not to good with words) and during the match, unless u could stabalize your bot on the ramp and allow the mouse bot to go and knock another stack, i dont see how its useful. They arent that strong and are pretty bad when it comes to handling. Anyways, thats just my opinion. They are legal but pretty much useless.
Reply With Quote
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-01-2003, 01:10
rust710's Avatar
rust710 rust710 is offline
Registered User
#0862 (Lightning Robotics)
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Canton, MI
Posts: 103
rust710 is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to rust710
Our team does not start design until Monday but I was thinking the same as other people I have read above. A tether bot that goes and knocks down other team's crates would be nice to have but partly impractical. A robot that can knock down these crates would have to be more then the extra 2 pounds you happen to have left on your robot. The tether bot's weight would take away from the regular robots weight defeating the purpose of defending and destroying. Although If the Judges say no to a tether bot then removing it can be easily done between practice and competition but it would be bad if your entire strategy depends on that tether bot.

If what I said makes no sense, please guess at what I mean because it is late and I am tired and I am not thinking clearly.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:08.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi