|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Runaway CIM motors
We use Victors to run the drivetrain motors, they seem to be less likely to fail in strange ways than the Jaguars. We've never had a Victor fail on a robot, but we've had a couple Jaguars fail the one year we used them for the drive motors.
Stories like this confirm that we're probably doing the right thing....even though many teams use Jags and don't have any problems... |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Runaway CIM motors
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Runaway CIM motors
We will try to order another Victor and go with that. I am going to check the alignment of our drive wheels and chain to make sure we are not overloading the motor.
Thanks again. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Runaway CIM motors
Just to second what's been said already: if you've pulled out the PWM cable, and the motor is still running, the problem is the speed controller. It can't be the code, it can't be the encoders*, it can't be the computer, it can't be the joystick, or anything else. If there isn't any signal going into the Jaguar, and it's still running, it's broken.
I don't know what your replacement plan is, but you probably don't want to run one side of your drivetrain with a Victor and one side with a Jaguar. They have slightly different input/output curves, so the motors will run at different speeds given the same input. It certainly won't break anything, but it will probably be harder to make your robot drive straight. * If you're using CAN, there is a way to run the Jaguars with direct encoder feedback, which will allow the Jaguar to drive the motor without being sent a constant command. Even so, it still shouldn't run on startup. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Runaway CIM motors
Thank you for your input,
We did order another Victor and plan to switch our drive motors to the Vics and our arm motor with the Jag. Without a "true root cause", we loosened the drive chains slightly to relieve some load on the motor. We had averything running OK yesterday, except for 1 side down without a controller. Our student morale picked up with the successes we did see and a game plan to get our new friend rolling. Now, if we can just keep the jags from smoking... Last edited by BullBot Mentor : 20-02-2012 at 07:54. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Runaway CIM motors
Immediately check your robot for a chassis short.
Although Jaguars are a point of failure, applying 12V across drive motors will spin them, no matter where the source. Albeit unlikely, make sure that this is not the case. |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Runaway CIM motors
Did a limit switch jumper on the Jaguar fall out? It is possible that the Jag is trying to get back from a limit condition. Full on is not the general failure on these devices. It happens but it is vary rare. If the PWM cable is left inserted and you disable the robot, does the motor continue to spin?
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Runaway CIM motors
I did take the Jaguar apart to inspect for damage and did not see any. I did not check to see if there was a misplaced jumper. Thank you for the advice.
We did disable the robot with the PWM cable removed and when enabled again, the motor took off. |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Runaway CIM motors
If you could check the jumpers, reinstall the PWM cable and let us know what happens when you power the robot, when you enable and then what you see on the Jaguar during each condition. With the PWM installed, does the motor spin immediately when power on the robot?
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Runaway CIM motors
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Runaway CIM motors
Steven,
If limit switches are not used, there must be jumpers in place on the Jag. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Runaway CIM motors
Thank you for the tip. We did stop and check all connections to make sure we were not shorting anywhere and everything looked good. We will check again when we meet up this evening.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|