|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Our Robot weight woes.. to rebuild or not to rebuild
As mentioned in this thread http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...=102188&page=5
Our robot when we just weighed it was ~148 lbs (without bumpers and battery)We are trying to see where to take all the weight off but we just cant see how to while keeping structural integrity (see robot below) ![]() So out question is, what if we did something crazy! such as make a new robot!?! out shooter works great so if we kept that and rebuilt everything else could we manage in ~9.5 hours? Thought? Plans? Suggestions? Thanks, 2240 |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Our Robot weight woes.. to rebuild or not to rebuild
You want to rebuild a robot and integrate a functional system into it in 9.5 hours?
![]() I don't understand where you're getting the majority of your weight from. It appears to be quite a small, compact little bot. How much does your drive train and shooting mechanism weigh? |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Our Robot weight woes.. to rebuild or not to rebuild
Hmmm - it does not look crazy heavy. Are you sure your scale is accurate?
Are those plates on top solid material? Do they need to be? Are the vertical support pieces solid? Will lighter extrusion work? What are the red things in the middle? Is there any steel on the robot? Can you substitute aluminum of similar dimensions? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Our Robot weight woes.. to rebuild or not to rebuild
For starters: Wheels
Those pneumatics look kinda heavy to me, so maybe switch them out for 8" plaction wheels, or maybe even 6" ones. You should be able to get away with going over the bump with them. If you're really pressed for weight, and want a competable robot, I'd put serious thought into not going over the bump at all. Take out the lift kits, and replace the pneumatic wheels with smaller, light ones. Re-organize your strategy to work on one side of the field. There are so many successful strategies using only one side of the field, and that could be a major benefit to you (PM me for examples of such strategies, we can talk). That's a nice turret you have there. Take it off. A stationary shooter has worked extremely well for us, and from what we've seen at our practice day worked way better than the turreted ones. Like said above, double, if not triple check your weight. You don't look heavy, but if you are, these are some steps to follow. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Our Robot weight woes.. to rebuild or not to rebuild
Quote:
4 CIMs 2 window 2 throttle 3 Banebot775 plus the electronics cRio2 6 Jags 3 victor 2 spikes Kinect small laptop (for image processing plus the 4 andymark pneumatic tires |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Our Robot weight woes.. to rebuild or not to rebuild
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Our Robot weight woes.. to rebuild or not to rebuild
Quote:
Last edited by viperred396 : 21-02-2012 at 17:04. Reason: Changed 1/4 in AL to 1/8 in AL for top and bottom plate |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Our Robot weight woes.. to rebuild or not to rebuild
I laughed at that
SuperNerd has some pretty good ideas. I'd also consider swiss-cheesing your top aluminum plate, if not replacing it with polycarb/plywood. The polycarb would look wicked nice, but plywood weighs less. Take a look at the on-board computer you've got. Can you strip any parts off of it or replace it's battery with a smaller one? |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Our Robot weight woes.. to rebuild or not to rebuild
How thick is the metal you are using? 1/16th inch is often plenty and half the weight of 1/8. Also solid plates are usually over kill, we saved like nearly 2 lbs by pocketing out a a 17inch circle of alum.
You could swap to 6inch wheels [loose some bump abilities...] and save some weight off those pneumatic tires. And as said above check to see if your scales are correct, weigh a person who knows there weight[safety first though] to see if it is off. This late in the game rebuilding large portions of your robot is probably to late... best try finding parts you can swap or take off. Large pieces of metal are a good place to start. Figure out what needs strength and what doesn't. And don't be afraid to loose some functionality. Lesser under weight robot is always better than a over weight robot of any caliber. Last edited by Mk.32 : 21-02-2012 at 16:53. |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Our Robot weight woes.. to rebuild or not to rebuild
We were worried about weight on our robot so we dropped the thickness of the sheetmetal we were using in a lot of places; or you could switch to plastic all together. Not only is the thinner stuff lighter but its way easier to machine and cut. Also what size bolts are you using, we dropped ours down to #10-32 to just about everything and saved a ton of weight.
|
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Our Robot weight woes.. to rebuild or not to rebuild
Welcome to the wonderful world of weight loss! We recommend that you weigh in early and often so you won't come back to visit next season.
Unless you know where all that extra weight is coming from, building an entirely new robot in 9.5 hours isn't going to save you. You're just as likely to end up with a second overweight robot. If you DO know where all the extra weight is coming from, then you should be looking at removing those systems/parts to make your weight. Looking at your picture, it's difficult to see where all of that weight is actually coming from. Until you can provide more and closer pictures of the robot, I'll throw out some general purpose weight loss guidelines:
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Our Robot weight woes.. to rebuild or not to rebuild
by observation, it would appear you have a thick electronics board. Also, you have some sort of metal sheet across the top. Pair it with w/e those giant red things are.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Our Robot weight woes.. to rebuild or not to rebuild
Thanks all for the quick and helpful replies!
Here are alot more pics from all round the machine b/c you asked Also those red tubes are just 8in Carboard tubes used to hold the ball after it is picked up http://img825.imageshack.us/slidesho...img0251njz.jpg |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Our Robot weight woes.. to rebuild or not to rebuild
From what I saw in the images you posted, there were a lot of flat metal areas without anything mounted on them. You could probably swiss cheese them a bit and lose some there.
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Our Robot weight woes.. to rebuild or not to rebuild
Time to break out the 5'' drill bit!
If you have your heart set on a turret, replace that aluminum plate with polycarb - that'll save you quite a few pounds. To go further, swiss-cheese the polycarb. Now, the plate/sheeting down below your construction cardboard can be cut and/or swiss-cheesed. The metal plate off to the right side of picture 3 looks AWFULLY thick. Does it need to be this thick and made out of metal? The swinging metal door you've got can go. Replace it with netting and a few staples. That laptop....do you REALLY need a screen? Remove it and use the VGA/HDMI port when you need to service it. Your electronics board is quite thick. Replace it with thinner plywood. Your wheel lift kit looks pretty heavy. Swiss-cheese it. Go crazy with hole-drilling. Also, drop some of your hardware sizes to 10-32 if you can. Drill your aluminum support pieces I believe Victors weigh less than Jags. If you're not using CAN, I would weigh your Jags and see if it's worth swapping some/all out for Vics. Back to the laptop, it looks big and heavy. I'd really consider removing the screen, and depending on how much hard drive space you need, using a lighter SSD, or creating your own SSD by buying a bunch of cheap flash drives, gutting them and arranging them all into a USB hub(s). From there, install whatever OS you want and arrange your drives into a RAID array if you want only one drive letter, as opposed to 10. Remove the CD tray, and CHANGE THE BATTERY out for a smaller one! Last edited by DominickC : 21-02-2012 at 17:23. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|