|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
pic: 256 2012 CAD
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 256 2012 CAD
There's no such thing as too much rendering... It looks good - great job.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 256 2012 CAD
How much does it weigh and what is the thickness on the extrusion?
Last edited by O'Sancheski : 26-02-2012 at 20:02. Reason: I really need to learn how to spell. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 256 2012 CAD
Quote:
I just shocked myself at that number. Things are subject to change with testing. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 256 2012 CAD
If that is true I am shocked you guys are under 120lbs. Most teams that I know of either use 1/16" or 1/8" thick extrusion. Solidworks is showing me that a 12in piece of 3/4" 6061 Aluminum weighs 0.88lbs.
Last edited by O'Sancheski : 26-02-2012 at 19:56. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 256 2012 CAD
Wait. I may be mixing up what an extrusion is. What is your definition of extrusion? Like what part of the robot?
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 256 2012 CAD
Extrusion is the box aluminum on your robot that the chassis and superstructure is made up of. Most teams use 1x1" boxed aluminum that is 1/16" or 1/8" thick.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 256 2012 CAD
Oh! Ok! Thanks. I believe it's 1/8th. If I remember correctly, it wasn't too thin.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 256 2012 CAD
OK, that sounds better. CAD looks very good. Now what you guys need to do is CAD up the electronics. Then it will look amazing.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 256 2012 CAD
Thanks! Our CAD team is doing that as we speak, though it may take a while to transition between our old robot and the new one. We're loosing space, and we were tight as it is on the old one.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 256 2012 CAD
Quote:
If you think you don't have any room, try having a short widebot with no room in the middle to put stuff. That's all I have the clearance to say ![]() |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 256 2012 CAD
That's how they are on our old robot. Thanks for the advice, though!
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 256 2012 CAD
It looks like your intake is a series of rotating paddles? Why do that instead of just rollers or a conveyor system leading to the vertical conveyor?
Interesting shooter design, how have the results with that setup been so far? |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 256 2012 CAD
Quote:
The shooter results have been excellent! Instead of having control over the horizontal angle of the shooter via a turret, we decided to have vertical control by being able to change the shooting angle, and the shooting power, if needed. It executes beautifully, and gives us consistent scores on the middle and top hoops. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 256 2012 CAD
What did you use to CAD this? It looks wonderful! I hope you do well at your regional(s)!
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|