|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
Quote:
I believe that you guys did this in a very appropriately timed fashion, publishing a video around the time of kickoff and also demonstrating this during practice day at a week 1 regional. As usual, 118 is a classy and innovative team. Sincerely, Andy Baker |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
118 just flipped and took a hit while trying to balance on the coopertition bridge.
Hope everything is ok |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
1477's fender shooting is deadly. It will be interesting to see where they go tomorrow. 118 is also fender shooting but to the side with the turret, the two of them would fit well together and would be a deadly combo. It will also be interesting to see what 148 can do when fully operational and how they fit into the equation. I have a strong feeling that 2 of these 3 teams will be in the top alliance.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
So is it just me, or is something screwy about the co-opertition bridge scoring?
In the rankings page, three teams are listed with 2 CP each, and all others have 0 CP each. That's not possible if the Twitter feed is accurate. CPs are scored for both alliances simultaneously, and can't be erased by DQs (although the QPs that ordinarily result would not count). (Also, the FMS web feed seems to have just gone down, so you may have to wait a while to check this.) |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
That's week 1 for you!
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
Match 25: if you can't shoot, for god's sake, go for the bridges! (Especially the middle one.)
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
did anyone else lose audio on the webcast?
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
ALL OF THE BRIDGES!!!!!! AHAHHAA best match I've seen yet
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
Oh man. What am I missing by being at work?!
(On break... ) Jane |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
231, 118, 3481 on red vs 2583, 3417, and 2789 on blue (one of the three was missing, I didn't see which)
Red balanced their bridge with 2. Coopertition was balanced with 2. Blue alliance bridge was balanced with the last robot. All robots on the field were balanced, too cool. (Red put 4 balls in autonomous too, also impressive) |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
Thanks, Chris. I bet the fans in the stands went nuts.
Wow. Jane |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
Quote:
![]() In this case, it looks like the Twitter feed has got it right (2 CP); the FMS feed still doesn't (blue didn't get any CP/red got 2 each). |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
Apparently they will let some shoddy bumpers through... at least at Alamo. I wish I didn't have to bring it up, but considering how critical we all have been over each other team's bumpers, it annoys me bumpers that break multiple rules are allowed to compete.
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
is the Alamo webcast down for anyone else? Or rather I should ask, does anyone have a working link? I managed to catch the last few but it seems like the feed died around 5:30ish local time with ~10 matches left in the day.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|