Go to Post I think Baker has lost it. - Andy Baker [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-03-2012, 23:10
KrazyCarl92's Avatar
KrazyCarl92 KrazyCarl92 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Carl Springli
FRC #5811 (The BONDS)(EWCP)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 521
KrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: WEEK 1

Stats from GSR (comprehensive match scouting): 30/50 teams scored in hybrid
18 teams scored in the top, 28 in the middle, and 9 in the low
Teams who shot a considerable number of balls, accuracy ranged from 0 to 83%
28 teams balanced at some point
some inbounders are really really bad...

Fender scoring dominates quals because few ranged shooters can keep up. And no one played defense consistently, which made for a very very boring game.

I hated Rebound Rumble, until I saw teams 1519, 885, and 2791 play in eliminations. It was boring; no defense, and all the matches were the same. They played the best defense as an alliance I have ever seen in an FRC game. If 2791 kept working, they win the regional in DOMINANT fashion. Their gameplay showed how STRATEGY aligned with good robots that fit a strategy can win matches against teams they are "overpowered" against. Hybrid is super important, both scoring and getting balls from the bridge as fast as possible.

Defensive robot is the most valuable robot on the field, which makes the ability to shoot from the key AND the fender important. If you can't access one, go to the other. Exclusively fender scorers may get a false sense of dominance if there continues to be a lack of defense in the quals.

Also balls that are worn down go much shorter than competition quality balls. The bane of Team 20....turned a 60% shooter into a 3-basket-the-entire-tournament atrocity. It was repeatably about 3-4 feet high, but we have plans for easy adjustment at future events, and also to shoot from the fender . Bridges are much harder to push down than FIRST's battery test implies.
__________________
[2017-present] FRC 0020 - The Rocketeers
[2016] FRC 5811 - BONDS Robotics
[2010-2015] FRC 0020 - The Rocketeers
Reply With Quote
  #32   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-03-2012, 23:26
cire's Avatar
cire cire is offline
Alumni, Mentor, and Coach
AKA: Eric Diehr
FRC #1716 (Redbird Robotics)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: De Pere, WI
Posts: 183
cire is just really nicecire is just really nicecire is just really nicecire is just really nice
Send a message via MSN to cire
Re: WEEK 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by KrazyCarl92 View Post
Stats from GSR (comprehensive match scouting): 30/50 teams scored in hybrid
18 teams scored in the top, 28 in the middle, and 9 in the low
Teams who shot a considerable number of balls, accuracy ranged from 0 to 83%
28 teams balanced at some point
some inbounders are really really bad...

Fender scoring dominates quals because few ranged shooters can keep up. And no one played defense consistently, which made for a very very boring game.

I hated Rebound Rumble, until I saw teams 1519, 885, and 2791 play in eliminations. It was boring; no defense, and all the matches were the same. They played the best defense as an alliance I have ever seen in an FRC game. If 2791 kept working, they win the regional in DOMINANT fashion. Their gameplay showed how STRATEGY aligned with good robots that fit a strategy can win matches against teams they are "overpowered" against. Hybrid is super important, both scoring and getting balls from the bridge as fast as possible.

Defensive robot is the most valuable robot on the field, which makes the ability to shoot from the key AND the fender important. If you can't access one, go to the other. Exclusively fender scorers may get a false sense of dominance if there continues to be a lack of defense in the quals.

Also balls that are worn down go much shorter than competition quality balls. The bane of Team 20....turned a 60% shooter into a 3-basket-the-entire-tournament atrocity. It was repeatably about 3-4 feet high, but we have plans for easy adjustment at future events, and also to shoot from the fender . Bridges are much harder to push down than FIRST's battery test implies.
Thanks for the stats, this year seems to have a pretty high percentage of autonomous scoring teams relative to other years. This may be because the fact that you don't need to drive anywhere to try for a point in autonomous though.

Can you (or anyone) elaborate on the "competition quality" balls? Were all the balls the same, or did they vary much like a lot of teams reported on these forums during build? Were they all more firm, non deflated? At what point did they replace the balls, if at all?

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #33   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-03-2012, 00:28
Deetman Deetman is offline
Registered User
AKA: Kevin Dieterle
no team
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 203
Deetman has a reputation beyond reputeDeetman has a reputation beyond reputeDeetman has a reputation beyond reputeDeetman has a reputation beyond reputeDeetman has a reputation beyond reputeDeetman has a reputation beyond reputeDeetman has a reputation beyond reputeDeetman has a reputation beyond reputeDeetman has a reputation beyond reputeDeetman has a reputation beyond reputeDeetman has a reputation beyond repute
Re: WEEK 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by cire View Post
Can you (or anyone) elaborate on the "competition quality" balls? Were all the balls the same, or did they vary much like a lot of teams reported on these forums during build? Were they all more firm, non deflated? At what point did they replace the balls, if at all?

Thanks!
From my viewpoint observing in the stands, the "quality" of the balls in play generally seemed to exhibit general wear and tear akin to what teams noticed during build season. At Hatboro-Horsham it appeared that if a ball was largely intact (no significant divots or gouges) it was used. If a ball sustained significant damage it was removed from play after the match. I know I saw at least two ball-hats.

2018 (HH winning alliance, 2nd seed) had a unique system on their robot that measured the compression of the balls and adjusted their shooter accordingly. Talking with someone in their pits, their testing showed that a 10% variability in compression could result in shot variances of 10 feet.
__________________

FIRST Mid-Atlantic Volunteer (2012-present)
Team 1014 Alumni (2004-2005)
Team 1712 Mentor (2011-2015)
Reply With Quote
  #34   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-03-2012, 00:34
Andrew Lawrence
 
Posts: n/a
Re: WEEK 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deetman View Post
From my viewpoint observing in the stands, the "quality" of the balls in play generally seemed to exhibit general wear and tear akin to what teams noticed during build season. At Hatboro-Horsham it appeared that if a ball was largely intact (no significant divots or gouges) it was used. If a ball sustained significant damage it was removed from play after the match. I know I saw at least two ball-hats.

2018 (HH winning alliance, 2nd seed) had a unique system on their robot that measured the compression of the balls and adjusted their shooter accordingly. Talking with someone in their pits, their testing showed that a 10% variability in compression could result in shot variances of 10 feet.
How'd they measure it?
Reply With Quote
  #35   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-03-2012, 00:35
ThirteenOfTwo's Avatar
ThirteenOfTwo ThirteenOfTwo is offline
College...
FRC #2438 (`Iobotics)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 118
ThirteenOfTwo is a name known to allThirteenOfTwo is a name known to allThirteenOfTwo is a name known to allThirteenOfTwo is a name known to allThirteenOfTwo is a name known to allThirteenOfTwo is a name known to all
Re: WEEK 1

I'l try to only add things that I didn't see mentioned yet in this thread.

Seeding rounds were being really boring because no one was playing defense, but I saw a lot of teams playing in ways that were just completely wrong. There was one team in San Diego who failed to balance on the coopertition bridge, so they went over, touched the opposing alliance's bridge (a nine-point technical foul), and then drove away and ended the match. I don't know if it hasn't sunk in yet, but your opponent's score this year DOES NOT MATTER. Especially if you have robots in your alliance that can't score, it is in your interest to win matches in qualifiers by playing defense! A lot of teams have some really weird ideas about seeding this year...

Two teams in San Diego had my favorite idea of the week--the 2v2 Qualification Match. At the beginning of the match, they sent one team from each alliance, neither of whom looked like they could score, to the coopertition bridge to lock down the bonus points. That's a terrific idea. The coopertition bridge is hard, and you need a lot of time to get on it... what is a robot that can't score going to do that's worth more than 2 QP?
Reply With Quote
  #36   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-03-2012, 01:44
KrazyCarl92's Avatar
KrazyCarl92 KrazyCarl92 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Carl Springli
FRC #5811 (The BONDS)(EWCP)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 521
KrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: WEEK 1

Our team sank 60% our shots in practice at our field in the top basket. Competition field, in the 7 matches out of 10 we were mechanically okay we shot around 4-8 shots per match and sank 3 all tournament, shooting almost all of our misses 3-4 feet high. The worn out balls squish easier than the ones on the field I believe (trusting the word of my drivers who felt both balls, and the physics that make sense). Our targeting system is unaffected by lighting changes from practice field to field, as evidenced by saving images to the cRio in match to check to see if that was the problem.

The physics behind this makes sense. If a ball is squisher, it will compress more easily. Since less force is needed to compress it, it will mean less normal force between the wheels and the ball, less frictional force, and less speed coming out. A firmer ball will take more force to compress to the same dimension, which means more normal force, and therefore friction, between the ball and the wheel leading to an increase in muzzle velocity. We're fairly certain the angle of our shooter didn't vary from practice field to competition, so the only thing is speed...which we can only attribute to the balls. We went to the practice field at competition and used our own balls (worn out and squishy) to shoot, no problems! So we need to find some way to account for that discrepancy.

picture of our robot: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/37578
__________________
[2017-present] FRC 0020 - The Rocketeers
[2016] FRC 5811 - BONDS Robotics
[2010-2015] FRC 0020 - The Rocketeers
Reply With Quote
  #37   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-03-2012, 01:47
davidthefat davidthefat is offline
Alumni
AKA: David Yoon
FRC #0589 (Falkons)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: California
Posts: 792
davidthefat has much to be proud ofdavidthefat has much to be proud ofdavidthefat has much to be proud ofdavidthefat has much to be proud ofdavidthefat has much to be proud ofdavidthefat has much to be proud ofdavidthefat has much to be proud ofdavidthefat has much to be proud ofdavidthefat has much to be proud of
Re: WEEK 1

Wait, does this mean that our robot with 14 inch wheels, a terrible kicker and a bridge lowering mechanism actually has a chance this year? I balance solo in 4 seconds, two bots in about 15 to 30, depending on the other driver. For pete's sake, we have a KICKER... Let's just say I'll focus on defense.
__________________
Do not say what can or cannot be done, but, instead, say what must be done for the task at hand must be accomplished.
Reply With Quote
  #38   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-03-2012, 01:50
KrazyCarl92's Avatar
KrazyCarl92 KrazyCarl92 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Carl Springli
FRC #5811 (The BONDS)(EWCP)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 521
KrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: WEEK 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidthefat View Post
For pete's sake, we have a KICKER... Let's just say I'll focus on defense.
Defensive robots are very effective, so don't worry. Sounds like you play the bridge great. Scoring in auto is huge, so at least try to do that, even if in the low basket. Also, if said kicker could clear some balls while playing effective defense (e.g. between pins), then you could be a GREAT eliminations partner.
__________________
[2017-present] FRC 0020 - The Rocketeers
[2016] FRC 5811 - BONDS Robotics
[2010-2015] FRC 0020 - The Rocketeers
Reply With Quote
  #39   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-03-2012, 02:19
Hebrew Hebrew is offline
Registered User
FRC #4228 (iRobotics)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 84
Hebrew is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: WEEK 1

So a good strategy for a defensive robot seems to be just parking up at the fender to stop dumping robots?

Where would be the best place to balance at if our robot is only 90 pounds including battery?

Any other good defensive strategies for a team that has no shooter, just an arm to lower/raise the bridge, I am interested since our team has never been to a competition before
Reply With Quote
  #40   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-03-2012, 03:08
ThirteenOfTwo's Avatar
ThirteenOfTwo ThirteenOfTwo is offline
College...
FRC #2438 (`Iobotics)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 118
ThirteenOfTwo is a name known to allThirteenOfTwo is a name known to allThirteenOfTwo is a name known to allThirteenOfTwo is a name known to allThirteenOfTwo is a name known to allThirteenOfTwo is a name known to all
Re: WEEK 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hebrew View Post
So a good strategy for a defensive robot seems to be just parking up at the fender to stop dumping robots?

Where would be the best place to balance at if our robot is only 90 pounds including battery?

Any other good defensive strategies for a team that has no shooter, just an arm to lower/raise the bridge, I am interested since our team has never been to a competition before
Can you hold balls so that you can ferry them from one side of the field to another? If not, then crossing the bridge to play defense at the beginning of the match is the best possible idea, but make absolutely sure that you don't get any penalties. See if you can write autonomous code to lower the bridge in the center of the field.
Reply With Quote
  #41   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-03-2012, 04:28
Koko Ed's Avatar
Koko Ed Koko Ed is online now
Serial Volunteer
AKA: Ed Patterson
FRC #0191 (X-Cats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Rochester,NY
Posts: 22,941
Koko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond repute
Re: WEEK 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorZ View Post
I've learned (from watching streams) that there are a lot of teams that are struggling.
this.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #42   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-03-2012, 08:17
RufflesRidge RufflesRidge is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 989
RufflesRidge has a brilliant futureRufflesRidge has a brilliant futureRufflesRidge has a brilliant futureRufflesRidge has a brilliant futureRufflesRidge has a brilliant futureRufflesRidge has a brilliant futureRufflesRidge has a brilliant futureRufflesRidge has a brilliant futureRufflesRidge has a brilliant futureRufflesRidge has a brilliant futureRufflesRidge has a brilliant future
Re: WEEK 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hebrew View Post
Where would be the best place to balance at if our robot is only 90 pounds including battery?
Directly above the extra 40lbs of ballast I would recommend bolting onto your robot at the competition. From observation it is very difficult to balance 2 if the second one is light, as the first bot moves up the bridge to give the second space, the light bot isn't heavy enough to hold it down so it starts to tilt and they flip, even when the 2 robots stay very close together.
Reply With Quote
  #43   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-03-2012, 10:30
SciBorg Dave SciBorg Dave is offline
Registered User
AKA: Dave Tharp
FRC #5920 (VIKotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Palouse WA
Posts: 209
SciBorg Dave is a splendid one to beholdSciBorg Dave is a splendid one to beholdSciBorg Dave is a splendid one to beholdSciBorg Dave is a splendid one to beholdSciBorg Dave is a splendid one to beholdSciBorg Dave is a splendid one to behold
Re: WEEK 1

During week 1 many teams had a problem tipping the bridge. This made me think how many teams added the needed 200 pounds of weight to there practice bridges. We found that the added 200 pounds made the bridge much hard to tip. I saw 1 teams arm bend when they tried to tip the bridge.
It also seem that many team practice tipping with out the bumpers on, when the arm came down the bridge got caught between the bumper and the arm.
Reply With Quote
  #44   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-03-2012, 10:41
flippy147852's Avatar
flippy147852 flippy147852 is offline
respect the hat
AKA: Felipe Agurto
FRC #1918 (NC GEARS)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Robolab (Fremont, MI)
Posts: 166
flippy147852 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: WEEK 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by SciBorg Dave View Post
During week 1 many teams had a problem tipping the bridge. This made me think how many teams added the needed 200 pounds of weight to there practice bridges. We found that the added 200 pounds made the bridge much hard to tip. .
A lot of teams at Gull Lake were trying to tip the ramps with a window motor, and it just wasn't cutting it. They needed a lot more pushing force to tip the bridge.
__________________
NC GEARS = Newaygo County Geeks Engineering Awesome Robotics Solutions

2009: 5 Events, 60-25-2. 1 District Win, 3 Finalists
2010: 4 Events, 51-13-6. 1 District Win, 1 Regional Win, 1 Finalist
2011: 4 Events, 58-18-4. 2 District Wins
2012: 4 Events, 46-25-0. 1 District Win, 1 Finalist
Total: 17 Events, 215-81-12. 308 matches in 4 years

Scouting it all: Priceless
Reply With Quote
  #45   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-03-2012, 11:18
pfreivald's Avatar
pfreivald pfreivald is offline
Registered User
AKA: Patrick Freivald
FRC #1551 (The Grapes of Wrath)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Naples, NY
Posts: 2,296
pfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond repute
Re: WEEK 1

We didn't add anywhere close to 200 pounds... I think we added 120 -- but we used the battery test as indicated on the field tour videos.

Here's hoping!
__________________
Patrick Freivald -- Mentor
Team 1551
"The Grapes of Wrath"
Bausch & Lomb, PTC Corporation, and Naples High School

I write books, too!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 16:12.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi