Go to Post As a programmer, I am trying to use more 0's than 1's to save weight. - Jared Russell [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-03-2012, 02:52
Chris is me's Avatar
Chris is me Chris is me is offline
no bag, vex only, final destination
AKA: Pinecone
FRC #0228 (GUS Robotics); FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Glastonbury, CT
Posts: 7,746
Chris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Chris is me
Re: Defensive strategies for Rebound Rumble

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperNerd256 View Post
After reading ThirteenofTwo's post about the lack of defense (and a pretty good idea) made me think of this: In the perfect defensive game, there would be two offensive robots, and one defensive robot per side.
I quite disagree with this categorization of teams as "defensive" and "offensive" in terms of alliance roles. You're only limiting your alliance if you stick to that paradigm too strongly.

A lot people assume "defense" = physical play on the opponent's side of the field and "offense" = scoring points. That viewpoint is incredibly limiting. There is so much more to this game than that.

For example: Would you call getting on the opponent's side of the field and passing balls forward "offense" or "defense"? I would say it is both. It is also, context-dependent, a highly effective way to play the game. A point denied and a point potentially scored, if your partner in your scoring zone is ready with the catch.

What about 488 and 118's balance blockade in the semis of Alamo? That is "defense" in every sense of the word. Yet, if that alliance stuck to the conventional wisdom of "two offense one defense" role-based play, they would not have stood a chance.

Abandon your preconceived notions, play every match to win, and most importantly THINK. That is the key to this game... and every other, for that matter.
__________________
Mentor / Drive Coach: 228 (2016-?)
--2016 Waterbury SFs (with 3314, 3719), RIDE #2 Seed / Winners (with 1058, 6153), Carver QFs (with 503, 359, 4607)
Mentor / Consultant Person: 2170 (2017-?)
.
College Mentor: 2791 (2010-2015)
-- 2015 TVR Motorola Quality, FLR GM Industrial Design -- 2014 FLR Motorola Quality / SFs (with 341, 4930)
-- 2013 BAE Motorola Quality, WPI Regional #1 Seed / Delphi Excellence in Engineering / Finalists (with 20, 3182)
-- 2012 BAE Imagery / Finalists (with 1519, 885), CT Xerox Creativity / SFs (with 2168, 118)
Student: 1714 (2009) - 2009 MN 10K Lakes Regional Winners (with 2826, 2470)
2791 Build Season Photo Gallery - Look here for mechanism photos My Robotics Blog (Updated April 11 2014)
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:58.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi