Go to Post NOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooo!!!!! I hate regolith. - apalrd [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Motors
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-02-2012, 13:38
de_ de_ is offline
Registered User
AKA: Dave Edwards
FRC #1310 (Runnymede Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 256
de_ is a jewel in the roughde_ is a jewel in the roughde_ is a jewel in the roughde_ is a jewel in the rough
FP 2011 (00801-0673) versus 9015 power

According to some specs we ran into, 2011 FP the 00801-0673 motor might be materially more powerful than a FP 9015. Anyone confirm this ?
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-02-2012, 13:39
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,125
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FP 2011 (00801-0673) versus 9015 power

Quote:
Originally Posted by de_ View Post
According to some specs we ran into, 2011 FP the 00801-0673 motor might be materially more powerful than a FP 9015. Anyone confirm this ?
http://www.usfirst.org/sites/default...torInfo4.1.pdf

http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/2432
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-02-2012, 14:44
fox46's Avatar
fox46 fox46 is offline
Registered User
FRC #2013 (Cybergnomes)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 400
fox46 has a reputation beyond reputefox46 has a reputation beyond reputefox46 has a reputation beyond reputefox46 has a reputation beyond reputefox46 has a reputation beyond reputefox46 has a reputation beyond reputefox46 has a reputation beyond reputefox46 has a reputation beyond reputefox46 has a reputation beyond reputefox46 has a reputation beyond reputefox46 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FP 2011 (00801-0673) versus 9015 power

Does the AM motor have any kind of internal protection in it?
__________________
Mentor, Team 2013 Cybergnomes 2010 - 2014, 2016
Mentor, Team 3756 RamFerno 2011 - 2013
Mentor, Team 854 Iron Bears 2005-2007
Founding member, Team 854 Iron Bears 2000-2005

Mech.Eng.+Mgt University of Ontario 2009
B.Ed OCT Trent University 2015
Professional Education and Product Knowledge Consultant - Toyota Canada Inc.
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-02-2012, 14:50
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,125
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FP 2011 (00801-0673) versus 9015 power

Quote:
Originally Posted by fox46 View Post
Does the AM motor have any kind of internal protection in it?
Have you tried emailing AM to ask?

  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-02-2012, 17:53
de_ de_ is offline
Registered User
AKA: Dave Edwards
FRC #1310 (Runnymede Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 256
de_ is a jewel in the roughde_ is a jewel in the roughde_ is a jewel in the roughde_ is a jewel in the rough
Re: FP 2011 (00801-0673) versus 9015 power

Thanks for links to motors. I'd lost track of where I had seen that data.

Was also hoping some users had some real world experiences with the two motors and could say yes they saw a noticable difference corresponding to the higher rated power.
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-02-2012, 11:01
caffel caffel is offline
Registered User
AKA: Charlie Affel
FRC #0423
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Springfield, PA
Posts: 72
caffel is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: FP 2011 00801-0673

I have been looking for this one too.
We should note that it is not on the list of approved motors for 2012 in my copy of the rules.
__________________
Charlie Affel,
Mentor 423
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-02-2012, 11:13
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,125
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FP 2011 00801-0673

Quote:
Originally Posted by caffel View Post
I have been looking for this one too.
We should note that it is not on the list of approved motors for 2012 in my copy of the rules.
What does the pronoun "it" refer to in your post?

If "it" refers to either the 9015 and the 0673, then you have an outdated copy.

  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-03-2012, 17:47
de_ de_ is offline
Registered User
AKA: Dave Edwards
FRC #1310 (Runnymede Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 256
de_ is a jewel in the roughde_ is a jewel in the roughde_ is a jewel in the roughde_ is a jewel in the rough
Re: FP 2011 (00801-0673) versus 9015 power

update: You can sure tell when the higher power, higher kv motor is installed. The wheels turned way faster (due to higher KV) and the motor ran significantly hotter (more current draw: had to install fan), ended up gearing the shooter speed down. More is not necessarily
always better
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-03-2012, 17:57
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,125
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FP 2011 (00801-0673) versus 9015 power

Quote:
Originally Posted by de_ View Post
update: You can sure tell when the higher power, higher kv motor is installed. The wheels turned way faster (due to higher KV) and the motor ran significantly hotter (more current draw: had to install fan), ended up gearing the shooter speed down. More is not necessarily always better
If a wheel shooter motor is running hot, it's usually one of three things:
  • improper gearing

  • blocked air vents

  • too much friction


  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-03-2012, 18:43
de_ de_ is offline
Registered User
AKA: Dave Edwards
FRC #1310 (Runnymede Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 256
de_ is a jewel in the roughde_ is a jewel in the roughde_ is a jewel in the roughde_ is a jewel in the rough
Re: FP 2011 (00801-0673) versus 9015 power

fyi: We had a 9015 on before (16K no load), and a 0673 on afterwards (19k no load). The extra rpm was surprising visible (actually way too fast full power) and the power required to sustain the higher rpm was clearly higher (wheel hubs have wind resistance, also the AM planetary has resistance presumidly proportion to the speed they turn). We had a clip on amp meter monitoring amp draw and it would go over 30 amps peak when a ball when through until the rpm recovered. And of course they had to test a ton of balls.. So things got hot.


Update Clarification (sorry): We had the motor driving a AM 3.7/1 planetary driving a chain based gear reduction of 1 to 0.7 (ie wheel turns 0.7 rev per rev of output of AM gearbox). Our wheels are 8". Clearly the motors have to overcome planetary loses, chain loses and wheel turning loses so they are not running at no load speed but they are still pretty fast. We added a second motor also with a fan to spread the heat load between the motors (until we can prove one motor can survive). My best guess we could get away with final chain ratio of 2/1 reduction and one motor.

Last I heard, these motors were only 60% efficent so even at 15 amps, 0.4 x 15 amps x 12v = 72 watts (compare to a 60w light bulb) so things heat up. I've never regretted adding a (little victor) fan to blow in and around one of the brush cooling slots !

Last edited by de_ : 04-03-2012 at 20:37. Reason: clarrification
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-03-2012, 19:34
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,125
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FP 2011 (00801-0673) versus 9015 power

Quote:
Originally Posted by de_ View Post
Current design has a 0.7/1 speed reduction
That sounds way too fast.

What is your wheel diameter ?


  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-03-2012, 20:10
nitneylion452's Avatar
nitneylion452 nitneylion452 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Joe Lee
FRC #3167 (Environmental Tectonics Crusaders)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 596
nitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud of
Re: FP 2011 (00801-0673) versus 9015 power

.7:1? That puts the motor at ~21k RPM and a measly 44.6 oz-in of torque (assuming no loss in the gearbox. More practically, you could expect 40.1 oz-in assuming 10% loss). To put that into perspective, the Hitec HS-322 HD servo has 53.3 oz-in of torque.
__________________
Joe
"The ones who will one day rule the world rule the basketball court today."

http://www.fatherjudgerobotics.webs.com

Volunteer 2012 MAR Region Championship - Field Reset
Volunteer 2013 MAR Region Championship - Field Reset
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-03-2012, 20:47
de_ de_ is offline
Registered User
AKA: Dave Edwards
FRC #1310 (Runnymede Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 256
de_ is a jewel in the roughde_ is a jewel in the roughde_ is a jewel in the roughde_ is a jewel in the rough
Re: FP 2011 (00801-0673) versus 9015 power

Sorry, updated above post to clarify that we have a AM planetary providing 3.7/1 reduction followed by a sprocket based reduction of 1.42 (1/0.7) (=5.2 net) driving 8" wheels.
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-03-2012, 20:54
nitneylion452's Avatar
nitneylion452 nitneylion452 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Joe Lee
FRC #3167 (Environmental Tectonics Crusaders)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 596
nitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud of
Re: FP 2011 (00801-0673) versus 9015 power

We are running 2 RS-550s (slightly more powerful than -9015) for our shooter, each drives 2 8" wheels and we haven't had any heat issues. We run them through 5:1 reduction BB P60 gearboxes and direct drive to the wheels. I would look at your shooter a little more closely if you're having issues with your motor heating up.
__________________
Joe
"The ones who will one day rule the world rule the basketball court today."

http://www.fatherjudgerobotics.webs.com

Volunteer 2012 MAR Region Championship - Field Reset
Volunteer 2013 MAR Region Championship - Field Reset
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-03-2012, 22:40
de_ de_ is offline
Registered User
AKA: Dave Edwards
FRC #1310 (Runnymede Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 256
de_ is a jewel in the roughde_ is a jewel in the roughde_ is a jewel in the roughde_ is a jewel in the rough
Re: FP 2011 (00801-0673) versus 9015 power

The heating was very apparent when we upgraded our original single motor 9015 to a single 0673 for hopefully improved recover time. The motor direct drove the shooter via the AM 3.7/1. When a ball was shot with the 0673, the current peaked at 30 amps+ and then ramped back down to normal over the ~ 3-4 seconds recover time. If during testing, you shoot a couple of dozen balls one every 3 seconds, that's a lot of heat the motor has to dissipate. In the competition, I suspect we would be lucky to shoot 6 balls over 2 minutes (at nowhere near full power). My original post was basically to highlight the quite visible effect of the higher KV motor had to our wheel speed (too much, had to slow it down with sprockets) and the increased power consumption (and risk to the brushes/motor life) that followed the extra speed.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:31.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi