|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Brakes.. Deploy!
This seems like a greeat way to get the coopertition bridge for 1 point if the clock is running out.
You guys looked great at gsr and I can't wait to play with you guys at CT again. Also not sure on this but those might be in violation of the metal traction device on the field rule. I hope there is tread or something like that on the bottom. Last edited by jblay : 06-03-2012 at 23:43. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Brakes.. Deploy!
My understanding of the rule regarding metal traction devices was about using a metal brush or "file card" (as I believe is the official "Manual" term for it) to gain a large amount of traction, and be nearly impossible to push. This is from memory, but I believe the rule began because a team used brushes somewhat similar to a wire brush used to clean grill racks, or wood files, that ultimately could cause damage to the field carpet. Perhaps someone who was around then, or has a more specific knowledge of it can back me up on that. But I don't believe the intent rule is against having metal at all in contact with the carpet - As long as it is smooth and not intentionally rough or desctructive, I'd imagine it could be used as skids, or in this case, a deployable brake.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Brakes.. Deploy!
Quote:
after that year it became illegal. So yeah good times. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Brakes.. Deploy!
Quote:
We have rubber pads on the bottom of the brakes so that they are in compliance with the field rule. It took numerous traction/friction tests but we finally came across a material that suffices. |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Brakes.. Deploy!
I am excited to see another team with brakes -- especially one as good as 175.
Brakes win matches. They're almost the best thing a team could ask for when it comes to balancing bridges. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|