|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Predictions Week 3: Full Court Press
The story of week two was all about the bridges. Coopertition points sky rocketed, headlined by 67 capturing 22 of 24 possible CP and the controversy surrounding GTR-East. The center bridge will continue to be a focal point at competitive events in the coming weeks, and the strategy and ethics discussions surrounding it won't die away quickly. Waterford demonstrated the coopertition point totals that can be put up at deep events, but totals like that will be hard to match in shallower fields.
The focus shifted about ten feet to each side of the field during eliminations. Triple balance attempts and successes became much more regular last weekend. 360, 956, and 3711 rode the triple balance all the way from the #8 seed to the regional championship in Oregon. The Waterford finals displayed the first simultaneous triple balance of the season (if only "triple double" wasn't so misleading, I'd shoe-horn it in for more basketball terminology). Perhaps the one dent on 341 and 1218's resumes is their lack of success with the 40-point bonus in Chestnut Hill, with four failed attempts leading to a switch to double balancing in the finals. Teams like 67 and 148 can accomplish the task quickly and reliably, but simply driving on the ramp has been enough for other alliances. The shackles off half-field play were shaken a little bit during week two. More teams, primarily high level ones, incorporated quick barrier crossing to stock up on balls into their game plan. And a few teams started to take on the "point guard" role of back court defense and passing balls forward. While defense remains sporadic and only moderately effective against higher level scoring machines, anticipate an slowly increasing level of full court play and more structured alliances. What to watch for:
Last edited by Looking Forward : 14-03-2012 at 23:28. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Predictions Week 3: Full Court Press
Quote:
-D |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Predictions Week 3: Full Court Press
I really missed that special feeling of being mentioned in a Looking Forward post. Still can't believe he/she/it is back.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Predictions Week 3: Full Court Press
Quote:
399 and 2789 will be playing in Salt Lake City this weekend. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Predictions Week 3: Full Court Press
Corrected. Didn't have the proper amount of time to go through the usual editing process this week, so some brain farts escaped into the full post.
Thanks! |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Predictions Week 3: Full Court Press
I feel educated!
Thanks! |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Predictions Week 3: Full Court Press
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Predictions Week 3: Full Court Press
Never get any love from LF. Oh well we are looking forward to making you look stupid
![]() |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Predictions Week 3: Full Court Press
No love for Bayou? ;(
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Predictions Week 3: Full Court Press
Bullet added. Somehow it got lost in the mix.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Predictions Week 3: Full Court Press
It's more fun to prove LF wrong anyway. Everyone loves an underdog.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Predictions Week 3: Full Court Press
Peachtree note: 1311 will unfortunately not be going out with the beautiful all black robot. They'd never done powder coating before, and it caused some major weight issues with the one that was on display at scrimmage. The robot competing will be mostly uncoated aluminum (with a few splatter painted parts if I have my way)
Doesn't mean it won't be memorable though. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Predictions Week 3: Full Court Press
While you can't use "Triple double", you can always say "Double Triple".
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Predictions Week 3: Full Court Press
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_%28basketball%29 |
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Predictions Week 3: Full Court Press
Quote:
We believe we've taken some steps to buck that trend and are excited to show everyone what we've got this year. You forgot to mention that 2168/125 are essentially twin robots that neither of us had a clue were being duplicated by the other. -Brando |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|