|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#61
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 New York City Regional
Quote:
G23 could have been been invoked; two robots crossing over could be construed breaking the flow. I believe one of the blue robots was incapacitated when it was pushed into the red key. G45 could have been invoked. |
|
#62
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 New York City Regional
Wow, crazy defense Final match 2...
Lots of fouls from both teams during the heavy pushing matches too... Red was able to stop blue from doing another triple balance, though... EDIT: Lots of things happening during that match... Not sure how this will turn out... |
|
#63
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2012 New York City Regional
What strategy is more intriguing at this point? The 522/125/1635 hybrid-triple balance "dare you to score 40 points worth of baskets on us" strategy, or the 195/369/333 "blow this whole match up to see how you respond" strategy. A brilliant chess match to finish this competition.
|
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 New York City Regional
So... can anyone explain what 333 was trying to do during that last match?
|
|
#65
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 New York City Regional
Wooot! Congrats 125 1635 and 522 on an awesome regional championship!
|
|
#66
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 New York City Regional
I can't really think of a good reason for what they were doing, other than if their robot failed.
|
|
#67
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 New York City Regional
Quote:
Also congrats to the winning teams 125 1635 and 522! And also awesome job to 195, 333, and 369! -D |
|
#68
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 New York City Regional
Quote:
I enjoyed the 195/333/369 second match strategy. Defense all the way. |
|
#69
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 New York City Regional
Hmm... If Red didn't do crazy defense that gave Blue 21 foul points in final match 3, they might have had a better chance of winning.
![]() Last edited by TD912 : 18-03-2012 at 16:31. |
|
#70
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 New York City Regional
My guesses until someone at NYC clears things up
Finals 2 - Inbounder shots that didn't register before the scoreboard vanished swung the 26-36? Otherwise I have no clue why, because Blue's strategy in not letting 125 on the bridge made total sense if it would've resulted in a tie. Finals 3 - Red decided that they didn't care about penalties as long as they stopped the triple. 333 still should've backed off after 125 was on the bridge (even before 1635 got on), but they seemed to be having issues/have given up by then. Great elimination rounds, congratulations to all the teams! |
|
#71
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 New York City Regional
Here's the video, thanks to trident for getting it up so quickly:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ifzwt...ure=plpp_video I have no idea what 333 was trying to do... it looks like they helped blue way more than they hurt them. |
|
#72
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 New York City Regional
Congrats to our alliance for the incredible gameplay.
|
|
#73
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 New York City Regional
333 should have received a red card under [G25] in addition to those.
|
|
#74
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 New York City Regional
Is it confirmed that they received the 9pt technical for bridge interfering? I assume so, because to me that red bridge is not balanced as 333 rammed it at the final second and is supporting 125.
|
|
#75
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 New York City Regional
Definitely. Maybe they didn't want to pour salt into a wound though.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|