|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Alternative to PID speed control
Quote:
Questions 1 & 2: I'm guessing this controller would work fine in TeleOp. If that is the case, the answer to both questions 1 & 2 would be 20ms1. Question 3: For this application, no other control scheme provides faster spin-up or recovery time than the controller Martin described2. So if Martin's controller approach doesn't respond quickly enough, you won't be able to improve things by using PID. 1 if the CAN cannot respond that fast, the encoder could be moved to the cRIO and read by the FPGA. 2 we used to call this a "bang-bang" control (for obvious reasons) when I was working aerospace back in the '80s. . see this: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh....php?p=1146748 . @Martin: what was your criterion for selecting the voltage ramp rate? did you try this with a much faster ramp? Last edited by Ether : 21-03-2012 at 16:37. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|