Most Regional Wins ever

[Racer26]

Karthik made a comment during the introductions to Finals 1-1 at WAT 2012, about 2056 being the team with the 4th most regional wins ever, at 12.

By my count, 1114 has 19, and 67 has 18 (if you count MI districts and MSC), 71 has 13. Are these the 3 that Karthik was talking about? Anybody got more regional wins to their name than 1114?

We all know now, that 2056 is even more impressive, since they've now been to 13 regionals, and won all 13.

2056's streak from their rookie event surpassed 254's previous record (of 8, IIRC) about 2 years ago.

[Lil' Lavery]

Team 254 has 21, iirc.

[Kearse]

As of right now the order of regional wins (including districts and MSC as regionals) are:

254: 21
1114: 19
67: 17
71, 233, 2056: 13
217: 12
16,111, 469: 11

[Nathan Streeter]

As of after the Waterloo event, 2056 is tied with 71 for 4th most Regional Wins... during the event they were 5th in that category. I counted wins (using the FIRST website) for as many teams as I could think of that would be very good in this category... I included District, Regional CMP, and Regionals in "Regional Wins" and also mentioned any CMP or Divisional CMP wins. I included all of these in the tallies on the left. In cases of ties, I ranked the teams higher that had more wins at CMP.


25 - 254 has 21 Regional Wins (+1 CMP Win, +3 additional Dvisional Wins).

23 - 67 has 18 Regional and District Wins (+3 CMP Wins, +2 more Division Wins).

21 - 1114 has 19 Regional Wins (+1 CMP Win, +1 more Division Win).

18 - 71 has 13 Regional Wins (+4 CMP Wins, + 1 more Division Win).

17 - 217 has 11 Regional & District Wins (+2 CMP Wins, +4 more Division Wins).

16 - 233 has 12 Regional Wins (+4 Division Wins).

15 - 111 has only 10 Regional Wins (+3 CMP Win, +2 additional Division Wins)... I expected more Regional Wins...

14 - 25 has 9 Regional Wins (+1 CMP Win, +4 more Division Wins).

14 - 51 (&47&65) has 12 Regional and District Wins (+1 CMP Win, +1 CMP Division Win).

14 - 2056 has 13 Regional Wins (+ 1 CMP Division Win).

13 - 469 has 10 Regional and District Wins (+1 CMP Win, +2 more CMP Division Wins).

13 - 175 has 10 Regional Wins (+3 consecutive CMP Division Wins).

12 - 330 has 10 Regional Wins (+1 CMP Win, +1 more CMP Division Win)

12 - 16 has 11 Regional Wins (+1 CMP Division Win)

11 - 177 has 4 Regional Wins (+2 CMP Wins, +5 more Division Wins).

11 - 60 has 8 Regional Wins (+3 CMP Division Wins).

10 - 33 has only 8 Regional & District Wins (I expected more). They also have 2 Division Wins to their name.

9 - 987 has 7 Regional Wins (+1 CMP Win, +1 CMP Division Win)

9 - 148 has stockpiled 8 Regional Wins (+1 CMP Win) since 1995, with all but one since 2008.

9 - 341 has 8 Regional and District Wins, with 3 this year (+1 CMP Win).

8 - 365 has 7 Regional Wins (+1 CMP Win).

8 - 121 (&78) have 7 Regional Wins (+1 CMP Win).

8 - 343 has 7 Regional Wins (+1 CMP Division Win).

8 - 359 has 8 Regional Wins.

7 - 968 has 4 Regional Wins (+3 CMP Division Wins).

7 - 494 has 5 Regional and District Wins (+1 CMP Win, +1 CMP Division Win).

7 - 45 has 6 Regional Wins (+1 CMP Win).

7 - 69 has 7 Regional Wins.

6 - 1625 has 5 Regional Wins (+1 CMP Win).

6 - 176 has 5 Regional Wins (+1 CMP Win).

6 - 48 has 5 Regional Wins (+1 CMP Win).

6 - 1126 has 4 Regional Wins (+2 CMP Division Wins).

6 - 85 has 5 Regional & District Wins (+1 CMP Division Win).

6 - 245 has 5 Regional & District Wins (+1 CMP Division Win).

6 - 1503 has 5 Regional Wins and 1 CMP Division Win.

6 - 103 has 6 Regional Wins.

6 - 118 has 6 Regional Wins.

6 - 234 has 6 Regional Wins.

6 - 1477 has 6 Regional Wins.

6 - 1918 has 6 Regional & District Wins.

5 - 294 has 3 Regional Wins (+2 CMP Wins).

5 - 340 has 3 Regional Wins (+2 CMP Division Wins).

5 - 190 has 4 Regional Wins (+1 CMP Win).

5 - 971 has 4 Regional Wins (+1 CMP Win).

5 - 64 had 3 Regional Wins (+2 CMP Division Wins).

5 - 241 has 4 Regional and District Wins (+1 CMP Division Win).

5 - 1124 has 4 Regional Wins (+1 CMP Division Win).

5 - 368 has 5 Regional Wins.

5 - 1676 has 5 Regional Wins.

5 - 1717 has 5 Regional Wins.

5 - 2415 has 5 Regional Wins.

4 - 173 has 2 Regional Wins (+1 CMP Win, +1 more CMP Division Win)

4 - 180 has 3 Regional Wins (+1 CMP Win).

4 - 68 has 3 Regional and District Wins (+1 CMP Division Win).

4 - 195 has 3 Regional wins (+1 CMP Division Win).

4 - 2016 has 3 Regional Wins (+1 CMP Division Win).

4 - 201 has 3 Regional and District Wins (+1 CMP Division Win).

4 - 70 has 4 Regional & District Wins.

4 - 126 has 4 Regional Wins.

4 - 1086 has 4 Regional Wins.

4 - 1261 has 4 Regional Wins.

4 - 1986 has 4 Regional Wins.

4 - 548 has 4 Regional & District Wins.

4 - 2337 has 4 District Wins.


I used TBA (which is spotty in pre-2006 years) to figure out that 40 had 3 Regional Wins since then. I think they won GSR in 2005 and I imagine they'd won some events before then. Regardless, RIP, #40... You'll forever be missed by the FIRST Community, particularly here in New Hampshire! We missed you deeply at GSR this year...

I'm sorry to the teams that I forgot to put on this list... I'm sure there are more teams with at least 4 Event Wins; however, I was running off my own fallible memory (and the USFIRST.org website).


Nathan

[jspatz1]

1986 has 4 regional wins.

[Nuttyman54]

Originally Posted by Nathan Streeter

I used TBA (which is spotty in pre-2006 years) to figure out that 40 had 3 Regional Wins since then. I think they won GSR in 2005 and I imagine they'd won some events before then. Regardless, RIP, #40... You'll forever be missed by the FIRST Community, particularly here in New Hampshire! We missed you deeply at GSR this year...
Nathan

40 actually got their first (and second) regional win in 2008.

[Nathan Streeter]

Originally Posted by jspatz1

1986 has 4 regional wins.

Sorry for the omission - I added you in now! I keep thinking of more and more teams that I didn't think of initially...

Originally Posted by Nuttyman54

40 actually got their first (and second) regional win in 2008.

I stand corrected... To add to their reputation a bit though, they were Regional Finalist 6 times, often losing narrowly to very strong alliances.

[OZ_341]

341 also has a CMP division win for Galileo in 2003.
The only time we ever appeared on Einstein was also our very first Blue Banner. What a thrill that was.

[Grim Tuesday]

Originally Posted by OZ_341

341 also has a CMP division win for Galileo in 2003.
The only time we ever appeared on Einstein was also our very first Blue Banner. What a thrill that was.

Who knows, might happen again this year!

[MagiChau]

BOB feels left out. We have 3 Regional Wins and 2 District Wins for a total of 5. Curie Division Winner in 2001 despite what the FIRST website says. Funnily enough we are 7 times finalists ( 2 District, 2 Regional, and 3 Division.) Maybe we can start a Finalist list.

[Nathan Streeter]

Originally Posted by MagiChau

BOB feels left out. We have 3 Regional Wins and 2 District Wins for a total of 5. Curie Division Winner in 2001 despite what the FIRST website says. Funnily enough we are 7 times finalists ( 2 District, 2 Regional, and 3 Division.) Maybe we can start a Finalist list.

Michael, Sorry for leaving 85 out! According to the FIRST website, you were a Division Winner in 2000... is that in addition to or instead of the 2001 Win? Congratulations on your team's success! :-)

[Justin Montois]

The FIRST website is an astonishingly unreliable source for results.

[MagiChau]

Originally Posted by Nathan Streeter

Michael, Sorry for leaving 85 out! According to the FIRST website, you were a Division Winner in 2000... is that in addition to or instead of the 2001 Win? Congratulations on your team's success! :-)

The data I believe FIRST has is paper so the 2000 is an error and should be 2001. Thank you, although we have had our bad years as well.

[Nathan Streeter]

Originally Posted by Justin Montois

The FIRST website is an astonishingly unreliable source for results.

Agreed... They seem pretty reliable if you don't go back beyond about 2002... their accuracy before that period seems "astonishingly unreliable," as you said. I've tried to put that as a disclaimer as much as I can! :-)

[Karthik]

Originally Posted by Nathan Streeter

Agreed... They seem pretty reliable if you don't go back beyond about 2002

Their reliability past that point is pretty poor as well. Kearse and I spent some time this summer tracking data down and we found all sorts of mistakes in the FIRST databases.