|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Bridge scores visualized
It's something I've noticed a lot in watching webcasts, that the Michigan District teams have put a lot more work into the co-op bridge then other teams at other events. Not sure if it is a byproduct of the quaility of teams or if the district model promoted it much more, because of the need to seed higher for points.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Bridge scores visualized
Thanks for putting this together, Steven - it's a really helpful way of quickly seeing the balancing results! I noticed that the winning alliance (and score) are bolded for each match... while that can be noticed, perhaps a more noticeable way of highlighting the winning alliance/score would be good? Italicizing might stand out more?
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Bridge scores visualized
^At Virginia, the co-op bridge wasn't even balanced until Saturday, despite numerous attempts. I think at NCR, with 27 of 53 teams playing in a prior event, the co-op bridge will be balanced 75% of the time or more.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Bridge scores visualized
CT relied heavily on Coopertition. Even if they didn't have a chance at beating their alliance on score points, they would balance with them for the coopertition points for better ranking. Also had quite a few 2x2x2 balances. Can't wait until tomorrow's matches!
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|