|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#46
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
Northville:
1. 67 548 3656 2. 2337 1684 1502 3. 302 3098 4405 4. 1250 830 240 5. 1076 835 3641 6. 703 308 66 7. 4294 68 3535 8. 573 1322 3668 |
|
#47
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
Colorado:
1. 2996 399 3807 2. 3729 1157 2240 3. 1158 159 4387 4. 662 1764 3172 5. 1977 1332 1361 * 6. 1410 3200 1619 7. 2352 2341 4386 8. 2945 2036 4388 *1583 Declined 1977 and 1332's invitation. Last edited by bobwrit : 24-03-2012 at 14:34. Reason: made it clearer |
|
#48
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
Why would 1583 decline and not be in eliminations??
|
|
#49
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
Hawaii:
1. 2439*-359-4218 W 2. 1056-2443-3882 SF 3. 368-2090-3881 F 4. 2445-2348-2504 QF 5. 2438-3008-2455 SF 6. 2459-2465-1378 QF 7. 2437-3880-2460 QF 8. 2896-4158-3306 QF *368 declined 2439 |
|
#50
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
Their representative was not fully aware of the rules regarding alliance selections. Although the emcee did go over the rules right before alliance selections, they thought they were able to decline and join another alliance.
|
|
#51
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
Lenape MAR District
1 - 1089, 25, 1712 QF 2 - 2180, 103, 3974 SF 3 - 365, 2590, 816 W 4 - 2607, 224, 2559 SF 5 - 87, 2729, 1640 QF 6 - 316, 272, 1647 QF 7 - 223, 423, 484 QF 8 - 2191, 1391, 1370 F Last edited by kjohnson : 25-03-2012 at 15:53. |
|
#52
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
Is it possible they were broken and were trying to do the alliance a favor?
|
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
Quote:
Very interesting world alliance selections are. Last edited by BrendanB : 25-03-2012 at 16:32. |
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
Quote:
The 5th ranked alliance then selected 1361, and selections progressed as normal. A couple of selections later, after looking at the rules along with the head referee, the MC announced to the audience that no, 1583 could not be selected again because they had declined a selection. The look of shock and horror that was present on the representative's face made it clear that he did not know at the time what he had done by declining the selection. Throughout the regional, while 1583 was not the best robot present, they were a very consistent team that worked well and never broke down through the 11 matches they played over the previous two days. |
|
#55
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
Beating them to posting results:
Colorado: 1. 2996 399 3807 W 2. 3729 1157 2240 SF 3. 1158 159 4387 F 4. 662 1764 3172 SF 5. 1977 1332 1361* QF 6. 1410 3200 1619 QF 7. 2352 2341 4386 QF 8. 2945 2036 4388 QF *1583 Declined 1977 and 1332's invitation. |
|
#56
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
365 declined 1089.
|
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
I'm pretty sure that 1716 picked 1736 first, and 930 was the second. Also, 1732 declined 1716.
|
|
#58
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
Troy District
1. 67-469-244 2. 548-217-2604 3. 4002-1918-453 4. 2851-3539-3284 5. 216-33-226 6. 288-2960-3302 7. 1718*-245-910 8. 3657-3667-66 *Declined selection by 216 |
|
#59
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
Greater Toronto West Regional
1 - 3161, 1114, 2634 F 2 - 1241*, 907, 771 SF 3 - 188, 1075, 1482 QF 4 - 1310, 2386, 2185 SF 5 - 1334, 772, 2013 QF 6 - 2056, 4001, 2200 W 7 - 4069, 3571, 2935 QF 8 - 4357, 1305, 4250 QF *2056 declined 1241, *188 declined 1241 Washington DC Regional 1 - 1218, 836, 141 F 2 - 467, 357, 2914 W 3 - 620, 1731, 3123 SF 4 - 1719, 1389, 2537 QF 5 - 116, 174, 1418 SF 6 - 639, 888, 346 QF 7 - 2849, 2377, 134 QF 8 - 1646, 612, 1747 QF Connecticut Regional 1 - 2168, 118, 2791 SF 2 - 177, 228, 236 SF 3 - 195, 181, 20 W 4 - 237, 173, 1099 QF 5 - 1071, 558, 2067 F 6 - 1073, 95, 176 QF 7 - 694, 230, 1559 QF 8 - 175, 126, 869 QF Silicon Valley Regional 1 - 971, 254, 766 W 2 - 1868, 3256, 751 F 3 - 1538, 1280, 2035, 597 (backup for 2035) SF 4 - 114, 8, 4086 QF 5 - 3021, 670, 649 SF 6 - 852, 846, 840 QF 7 - 2473, 115, 100 QF 8 - 604, 2073, 192 QF Last edited by kjohnson : 31-03-2012 at 19:52. Reason: Updating results. Thanks Jeremy for backup info on SVR. |
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
Oklahoma Regional
1) 3528 - 1540 - 2395 - W 2) 476 - 2165 - 2389 - F 3) 1939 - 1742 - 3660 - SF 4) 1806 - 2354 - 2341 - QF 5) 2345 - 3507 - 2372 - SF 6) 3144 - 1561 - 3247 - QF 7) 2333 - 2352 - 2410 - QF 8) 2424 - 2461 - 3179 - QF No teams declined. All of the first 8 selections were within the top 16; team 2424 was seeded 15th. Last edited by StevenB : 31-03-2012 at 23:14. Reason: Final results |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|