|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#46
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
Quote:
![]() |
|
#47
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
I think they did it to gain an advantage over 2056. In my mind they would have had a better alliance with 188, but they accepted 3161 so that 2056 wouldn't get them. Good call? We'll find out.
Last edited by lemiant : 31-03-2012 at 21:49. |
|
#48
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
Quote:
![]() |
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
Just triple balanced. 2056 sent 2200 to play defense and had 4001 act as a deadweight.
|
|
#50
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
To produce the OPR matrices, right?
![]() |
|
#51
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
I'm fully aware that strong teams like 3161, 1114, and 2056 all have lots of strategy and discussions. I've watched them all play for the last 10 years, and have gained a pretty good handle on strategy. I can usually predict picks and declines with a reasonable level of accuracy. I'm a little surprised by a few decisions here is all, including 188's pick of us.
|
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
SF2.1... Shouldnt 1241 have gotten 49pt penalty for interfering with the blue alliances triple?
|
|
#53
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
The feed died. HELP! We just noticed that 1241/907's alliance won a match against 2056 and want to watch.
Edit: back, thanks 2200! Last edited by Bongle : 31-03-2012 at 15:21. |
|
#54
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
Quote:
I didn't see the match, so I can't comment either way. Though I would guess that someone might be asking the ref anyway. |
|
#55
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
Stream is back. I didn't see the alleged interfering, was there a call?
|
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
Youtube.com/watchfirstnow probably has a recording of it up
|
|
#57
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
EDIT:
It's 2056 vs 1114! Not to be disrespectful to the other teams, it's actually 3161/1114/2634 vs 2056/4001/2200. 1st vs 6th. I haven't watched Canada too carefully, but I think any qualification matches between 2056 and 1114 has gone 1114's way, and they are the stronger alliance, have a slightly more consistent triple and a better auto. However, 2200 and 4001 have played some great defence in the semis, so they might pose a threat that the 1st seed haven't seen before. I'm looking forward to it. Last edited by George Nishimura : 31-03-2012 at 15:51. Reason: 6th, not 7th seed. |
|
#58
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
This is going to be an incredible final round!
|
|
#59
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
Defintiely! I think this has been something we have all been waiting for. 1114 and 2056 split, and then end up against each other. Will 2056's record be toppled?
|
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
Finals are happening at GTR West right now! Join over 400 viewers at http://watchfirstnow.com
3161/1114/907 vs 2056/2200/4001 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|