|
#106
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
It was an awesome regional, two great alliances had an awesome finals
|
|
#107
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
Quote:
.In regards to my comments, I regret that I used such offensive language (and I have changed it), but the logic is not deserving of reprimand. I could never claim to have a better understanding of the decisions made by 1114 than you, but I believe that in absence of your reasoning, my assumptions were certainly solid. Quote:
From what I can glean from recorded matches it seems this analysis is born out in the matches. In the quarter finals 188 outscored 3161 by 6 in Autonomous and 21 in Teleop. While I respect team 1241, they were not the best alliance partner for 2056. Something you'd have a hard time disagreeing with, when 2056 stated it in the most meaningful way, by declining them. Last edited by lemiant : 31-03-2012 at 23:01. |
|
#108
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
One thing I noticed about the F.1 match was that not only did the red alliance outscore the blue in teleop, but 1114 did most of it with lots of traffic. At one point 1114 was trying to move and gather balls with 4 other teams in their zone, while 2056 mainly left alone. This isn't meant to take anything away from what they did, but I think what 1114 did to keep that match close was by far amazing.
|
|
#109
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
The language was what myself and many others took issue with. It's not always what you say, but how you say it.
|
|
#110
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
Quote:
Furthermore, If you saw any if the interaction during the elimination rounds between 1114 and 2056 off the field you would know that both teams wanted nothing but the best for the other. Those two have the strongest partnership in FIRST. There was no "screwing over" going on. |
|
#111
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
For years, people have questioned the legitimacy of 2056's winning streak. I've seen many people say that they've only remained undefeated because they always have the best partner at the regional backing them up (be it 1114 or another), and that can certainly be one of the reasons. But they've always built an outstanding robot to earn the right to have those partners.
Today, I think 2056 proved that they don't need the best partner at the regional to go the distance. No offense to 2200 or 4001, as they certainly proved to be great partners to OP Robotics, but 2056 was definitely in a league of their own amongst many of the Greater Toronto West Teams. They proved they don't need one of the Canadian powerhouses alongside them to take a regional. A lot of people are going to argue that they didn't deserve the win, because the opposing alliance wasn't necessarily at 100%. And that may be true. But the record books will forever show that 2056 won a regional without a powerhouse alongside them. In my humble opinion, 2056 has stepped out from the shadow of their recurring partners, 1114, and has reached the same level as the Simbots and, arguably, ascended even higher. On another note, with the whole "1114 tried to screw 2056" thing, I know that 1114 will never build anything less than the best alliance they can. They wouldn't even consider an offer from a team if they didn't think they had a strong chance of winning the event with them, or they were backed into a corner into accepting (being ranked low and declining would mean no eliminations). 3161 came amazingly close to taking the #1 seed at Greater Toronto East, and it's no coincidence that they took it this time. They are one of the strongest Canadian teams out there right now. And though they may not be as strong as 1114 or 2056, I certainly wouldn't argue with 1114's decision to accept. Were 1114 to decline, 3161 would have certainly made 2056 their next choice. If they'd accepted, they would have still had a great chance of winning. If they'd declined, 3161 would get their pick of the next strongest team, and 1114 and 2056 would still be split, since 1114 wouldn't be able to pick 2056. 1114 made a smart move accepting 3161's offer. Declining would have been a poorly thought-out decision. And 1114 always thinks their moves through all the way. Last edited by LeelandS : 31-03-2012 at 22:50. |
|
#112
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by lemiant : 31-03-2012 at 23:15. |
|
#113
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
Hello there! Great matches everyone. The final match was epic
![]() Our team only did two regional events this year. GTR East and West, and they were alright... I was hoping for us to be picked in the alliance selection, but it seemed like we did not make it... Could some teams please state on why they did not consider us to be one of their alliance partners? |
|
#114
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
I too am very confused about the picking process, one team in particular that helped us and one that we thought for sure was going to make alliance selections was team 1325. They had consistent hybrid shooting as well as amazing bridge traversal and driver skills, however they were not picked while others were picked without similar skills.
As a rookie is there something i am missing? Could someone clarify please? Thanks |
|
#115
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
Quote:
For 2056/4001/2200 I believe the thinking was that 2056 would be able to score fairly consistently throughout the match (as they did) and that the other 2 bots were able to play defense well as well as were small bots able to complete the triple balance which they pulled off in the finals to win them the first match. I didn't follow the other teams and selections as closely as I did 2056 otherwise I may have been able to offer more insight. Just my $0.02 Last edited by EpicLegacy : 31-03-2012 at 23:39. Reason: Re-worded |
|
#116
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
Quote:
![]() |
|
#117
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
Dave Verbrugge has had some pretty awe inspiring ones over the years, he's definitely the master of the historic intro. Of my own, GTR 2010 is still my favourite.
http://www.thebluealliance.com/match/2010on_f1m1 |
|
#118
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
To address some of the issues I quickly read.
1) In semi finals match where #2 alliance (1241 & co) faced the #7 alliance (2056 & co), 1241 took a hard hit and our drop-down mechanism was stuck in the extended position. We were able to drive to block the opposing alliance (not in their lane) from getting onto the bridge WHILE not touching it, therefore no penalty/DQ. 2) In semi's matches 2 & 3, we had connection problems. I do not know the reasoning behind what caused the issue/what the exact issue was, but there was a problem. 3) Team 1114's robot "dying" in the 2nd Finals match occurred at the start of the Tele-Operated period, they were at the same alliance station as Team 1241 was at for Semi's match 3 against 2056. I would like to thank & congratulate Teams 2056, 4001 and 2200 on their Regional Victory. Teams 3161, 1114 and 2643 for putting on the most amazing Finals that I have seen since I began in FIRST in '07. It was truly a weekend I (and many others on my team) will never forget! & Lastly congratulations to Team 1305 on their Engineering Inspiration award and to 907 and 771 for being our amazing alliance partners! ![]() |
|
#119
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
Quote:
Last edited by nikeairmancurry : 01-04-2012 at 02:22. |
|
#120
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Greater Toronto Regional West
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|