Michigan Coopertition Stats

[Littleboy]

Week 1: in 20 of 148 matches, it was balanced (13.5%)
Gull Lake: in 3 of 72 matches, it was balanced (4.2%)
Kettering: in 17 of 76 matches, it was balanced (22.4%)
Week 2: in 48 of 160 matches, it was balanced (30.0%)
Traverse City: in 15 of 80 matches, it was balanced (18.8%)
Waterford: in 33 of 80 matches, it was balanced (41.3%)
Week 3: in 66 of 160 matches, it was balanced (41.3%)
West Michigan: in 37 of 80 matches, it was balanced (46.3%)
Detroit: in 29 of 80 matches, it was balanced (36.3%)
Week 4: in 83 of 162 matches, it was balanced (51.2%)
Niles: in 43 of 82 matches, it was balanced (52.4%)
Northville: in 40 of 80 matches, it was balanced (50.0%)
Week 5: in 102 of 160 matches, it was balanced (63.8%)
Livonia: in 51 of 80 matches, it was balanced (63.8%)
Troy: in 51 of 80 matches, it was balanced (63.8%)
Over the weeks, the coopertition bridge has been getting way more use.

Rounded to nearest tenth of a percent.
It may be slightly off.
Feel free to add to it with other events.

[JABot67]

Nice stats! I see that Livonia and Troy tied in Coop Bridge balances - This means that Livonia was just as good as Troy in all other competitive aspects of the game right?

[Tom Line]

Based on guesstimate extrapolation, I'm betting state champs ends up with coop in the 75% range. (Assuming attempts at coop increase at the same rate and there isn't any.... "funny business" going on in an attempt to hurt certain teams).

[Chris Hibner]

Originally Posted by Tom Line

Based on guesstimate extrapolation, I'm betting state champs ends up with coop in the 75% range. (Assuming attempts at coop increase at the same rate and there isn't any.... "funny business" going on in an attempt to hurt certain teams).

I would be shocked to see funny business at MSC. It doesn't seem to go on there.

[MagiChau]

If we try really hard we could get close to 100% balanced considering there is a very high chance out of 6 robots at least one can tip the bridge. Though that would kind of ruin the point of it affecting seeding if everyone has the same amount of coopertition points.

[Littleboy]

It was balanced a total of 319 matches. (40.4%)

[pathew100]

Originally Posted by Tom Line

Based on guesstimate extrapolation, I'm betting state champs ends up with coop in the 75% range. (Assuming attempts at coop increase at the same rate and there isn't any.... "funny business" going on in an attempt to hurt certain teams).

I wouldn't expect any funny business. The results of MSC count toward the state ranking and who goes to the Championship. So it would be silly to hurt your own qualifying ranking.

[Jack Jones]

Originally Posted by pathew100

I wouldn't expect any funny business. The results of MSC count toward the state ranking and who goes to the Championship. So it would be silly to hurt your own qualifying ranking.

A ranking point is only worth 1/10 the points rewarded for each step in eliminations. Not only that, first pick will inherit the points of the team that picks them, so then their rank means nothing. There is a history of manipulating the standings and preventing certain alliance selections in that building.