Quote:
Originally Posted by Deetman
Should have been at a minimum a technical foul. The definition/interpretation of "interfering with the act of balancing" is hazy in this situation. The third robot was not on/touching the bridge so I would not interpret them as in the act of balancing. The other two robots however were on the bridge and could be argued were actively trying to balance.
|
If they were pushed into the bridge, though, there is no [G25] foul. The exception to [G44] only applies to [G28], touching an opposing robot, which is at worst a technical foul.
([G25] is the touching an opposing bridge/interfering with balancing foul)
Playing fields outdoors in the snow and the only field faults were when you ran out of gas!...ahh the old days - ExTexan [more] 
07-04-2012, 15:24
Threaded Mode