|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Tube Versus Channel
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Tube Versus Channel
1 question that I have that I have not seen mentioned is price. What is the cost of the tube versus the kit bot c-channel, which is included with the KOP. If it is expensive, I don't see much bonos to it over C-Channel, which works fine for most uses (at least for 3397). We used it on our chassis and tower and electronics mount. It is light and pretty durable. So, unless it has a VERY good benefit, I do not see the point of buying the tube.
Last edited by Walter Deitzler : 08-04-2012 at 15:50. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Tube Versus Channel
If you have a local aluminum supplier, just tell them that you'd like to purchase any 1"x2"x1/8" or 1/16" wall aluminum that they have as scrap. You can cut your costs from about $3.25 per foot to $.40 per foot. Work it year round and you'll have plenty of material come build season.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Tube Versus Channel
We used 3*1.5 inch tubing with .125 thick walls and a special hole pattern cut into it this year. 3/16 rivets and grade A 10-32 Button-heads are our fasteners of choice. This year the drive frame weighed 10lbs, and the entire frame weighed less than 16lbs. If you have the machining resources to do it, I would look at perforated tubes as a construction method, I cannot think of a way to make a lighter frame. For some examples check out team 40 or 111's robot from 2011
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|