|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
Is there a youtube playlist for these matches, or any kind of video archive?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
Yes... FIRSTinMichgian
|
|
#3
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
It's been an amazing competition so far. It's pretty tough to put up 61 and 72 points in consecutive qualifying matches and lose them both, but that's the way it is at a championship event. Tomorrow is going to be intense.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
Alliance selections:
1 469 67 830 2 2054 548 245 3 3098 33 2137 4 573 1918 70 5 4294 2474 3234 6 2337 1023 1684 7 51 217 2851 8 862 1718 3322 no refusals by anyone involved |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
So close to a double triple! And they made it a couple matches later!
It is indeed a rare year when you don't see the Thunder Chickens in St. Louis. Last edited by Grim Tuesday : 14-04-2012 at 14:49. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
Sf 1-2 Field Fault - all six robots dropped com at same time
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
I've been following it off and on all day in between house hold chores
That is pretty crazy there Chris to score that many and still lose a match. On the Code Red Robotics live stream there was just a mention of waiting on the replay camera for the ABC special. Does anyone know of that? When and where will it be broadcast? |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
So why wasn't [G25] applied to 67 when there was a blue robot touching them while balancing?
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
Presumably because the robot falling onto them is covered by [G44]
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
That's an interesting usage of it. Has some very interesting connotations in the future if that holds true through championships.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
I wouldn't really say it affected the balancing... if anything, it helped the blue alliance because otherwise the falling robot is probably on its side.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
I agree with the way it was called, but I can see an argument for calling G35 on 67 because their presence prevented 548 from driving off the end of the bridge, preventing a double balance. That's sketchy at best, and I think the refs did the right thing. Another interesting observation is that after 67 died, 469 (I believe accidentally) pushed them closer to the blue bridge. If anyone wants to rewatch it it's uploaded here.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
Quote:
Well if the robot was on it side, the blue alliance would have won. There were no bridge points in the final match (F 1-2). This was because the robot 67 was contacting (preventing from tipping) was still in contact with the bridge. Had the robot not been in contact with the bridge, the blue alliance would have received 20 bridge points. The final score was Red (469, 67, 830) 60 - Blue (2054, 548, 245) 49. With blue getting those 20 BP, the final score would have been Red 60 - Blue 69. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
Congratulations to 469, 67, and 830 for winning the MSC; which is no small feat!
|
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|