Disrupting Alliances

[nighterfighter]

Originally Posted by EugeneF

Once again, 111 was 9th, and it's reasonable to assume that other teams in top 8 (besides 1771) would have paired up with other teams in top 8. I don't mean to argue that picking/not picking 111 was the right choice. I'm just trying to show that picking 111 was not an unreasonable option.

Yes, you are right.

I was referring to 1771 attempting some form of a "scorched earth", as being discussed.

The way the alliances were seeded on Galileo last year couldn't really allow a scorched earth, while still allowing a chance for the alliance to do very well.

Sorry for any confusion.