|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Rule clarification (pneumatic solenoids in series)
I think your proposal follows both the spirit and the letter of the rules. Unless otherwise directed by a Lead Robot Inspector, I would accept it without hesitation.
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Rule clarification (pneumatic solenoids in series)
I believe you are OK with this.
You still only have the output of one valve connected to the cylinder. The intent of the rule is to prevent you from connecting 2 outputs together to a cylinder input, doubling the flow rate into the cylinder. |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Rule clarification (pneumatic solenoids in series)
Sean,
Our entire catapult system is reliant upon running solenoid valves in series. We've never had any trouble with inspectors; we just need to show them that each port on our cylinders is connected to only one valve. Last edited by Madison : 23-04-2012 at 12:36. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Rule clarification (pneumatic solenoids in series)
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rule clarification (pneumatic solenoids in series)
Hailey 0 sean 1
![]() |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rule clarification (pneumatic solenoids in series)
Couldn't you achieve the same result by pressurizing both sides of the cylinder equally? Only problem I can see is that it would be a bit less air-efficient.
EDIT: Never-mind, I just remembered how physics work... Last edited by Saberbot : 23-04-2012 at 19:24. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|