Go to Post Thank you GDC, for keeping everyone honest! - dtengineering [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 5 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #211   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-04-2012, 02:20
lorem3k's Avatar
lorem3k lorem3k is offline
1 + 1 = 0 (in Z/2Z)
AKA: Andy D.
FRC #1482 (Bishop Grandin Ghosts)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 165
lorem3k is a splendid one to beholdlorem3k is a splendid one to beholdlorem3k is a splendid one to beholdlorem3k is a splendid one to beholdlorem3k is a splendid one to beholdlorem3k is a splendid one to behold
Re: Einstein 2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by bduddy View Post
While I understand the idea, I'm not so sure about some of the things it might lead to. If Galileo loses they'll be forever known, rightly or wrongly, as "the alliance that only won at Championships because of field problems", and they deserve better than that.
I think some people may already (wrongly) have this impression of them.
__________________
Boo! Bishop Grandin High School / GM Canada / Tenaris
2013 Western Canada - Quarterfinalists (thanks 288/4719) / 2012 GTR West - Quarterfinalists (thanks 188/1075) / 2011 GTR East - Regional Winners (thanks 1114/1503)
Reply With Quote
  #212   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-04-2012, 03:30
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,819
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Einstein 2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by qzrrbz View Post
Pretty sure 1717/469/2471 would have rather have played all their matches with all guns firing! Were there others?
Pretty sure I can say the same thing about 330 and 68--both had extended time periods where they were immobile. Kept the division semis close...
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

Reply With Quote
  #213   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-04-2012, 03:43
qzrrbz qzrrbz is offline
Registered User
FRC #0469
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 210
qzrrbz is a splendid one to beholdqzrrbz is a splendid one to beholdqzrrbz is a splendid one to beholdqzrrbz is a splendid one to beholdqzrrbz is a splendid one to beholdqzrrbz is a splendid one to beholdqzrrbz is a splendid one to behold
Re: Einstein 2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH View Post
Pretty sure I can say the same thing about 330 and 68--both had extended time periods where they were immobile. Kept the division semis close...
Didn't realize alliance 3 was sitting still, too -- the "luxury" of viewing remotely and being a slave to what the cameramen thought "interesting" at the time. That makes this whole result even more disheartening.

There's always IRI...
Reply With Quote
  #214   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-04-2012, 04:00
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,819
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Einstein 2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by qzrrbz View Post
Didn't realize alliance 3 was sitting still, too -- the "luxury" of viewing remotely and being a slave to what the cameramen thought "interesting" at the time. That makes this whole result even more disheartening.
Watching the webcast, there was at least one time when both 330 and 1717 weren't moving at the same time, same area of the field (Red's scoring side). Not fun. In another match (F-1, I think), 68 spent much of the match immobile.

(For those not paying attention, this particular set of matches was Newton Semi 2, 1717/469/2471 against 68/330/639.)

And agreed on IRI. I think that IRI needs to have two sets of "special" matches: MAR champs/MSC champs and Einstein Revisited. Single elimination, comm issues are an immediate match reset.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

Reply With Quote
  #215   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-04-2012, 04:46
qzrrbz qzrrbz is offline
Registered User
FRC #0469
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 210
qzrrbz is a splendid one to beholdqzrrbz is a splendid one to beholdqzrrbz is a splendid one to beholdqzrrbz is a splendid one to beholdqzrrbz is a splendid one to beholdqzrrbz is a splendid one to beholdqzrrbz is a splendid one to behold
Re: Einstein 2012

OK, that's Newton #1 (on Einstein), #2, #3 all immobile at some point or other.

How about the other divisions?
Reply With Quote
  #216   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-04-2012, 07:00
Botwoon's Avatar
Botwoon Botwoon is offline
A.K.A. Matthew Ruane
FRC #0207 (Metalcrafters)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 152
Botwoon will become famous soon enough
Re: Einstein 2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by qzrrbz View Post
OK, that's Newton #1 (on Einstein), #2, #3 all immobile at some point or other.

How about the other divisions?
The Curie alliance was fine on comms on our field.
Reply With Quote
  #217   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-04-2012, 08:39
George Nishimura's Avatar
George Nishimura George Nishimura is offline
Lurker
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: London
Posts: 231
George Nishimura has much to be proud ofGeorge Nishimura has much to be proud ofGeorge Nishimura has much to be proud ofGeorge Nishimura has much to be proud ofGeorge Nishimura has much to be proud ofGeorge Nishimura has much to be proud ofGeorge Nishimura has much to be proud ofGeorge Nishimura has much to be proud ofGeorge Nishimura has much to be proud of
Re: Einstein 2012

So what happens at the end of this hypothetical "Einstein revisited"? Especially if 180/16/25 don't win, what exactly does it achieve? The winners won't become World Champions [especially because the conditions are different, you can't claim that this result is what would have happened on Einstein].

If it's for fun, and everyone's good-natured about it, and all teams are willing to participate, I'd be all for it.

But I fear it's not going to end well, and it's not going to bring any justice to proceedings.
__________________
Team 1884 - The Griffins (2007-2014)
Reply With Quote
  #218   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-04-2012, 09:37
Don Wright's Avatar
Don Wright Don Wright is offline
Registered User
FRC #0469
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Livonia, MI
Posts: 683
Don Wright has a reputation beyond reputeDon Wright has a reputation beyond reputeDon Wright has a reputation beyond reputeDon Wright has a reputation beyond reputeDon Wright has a reputation beyond reputeDon Wright has a reputation beyond reputeDon Wright has a reputation beyond reputeDon Wright has a reputation beyond reputeDon Wright has a reputation beyond reputeDon Wright has a reputation beyond reputeDon Wright has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Don Wright Send a message via Yahoo to Don Wright
Re: Einstein 2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gnishi2011 View Post
So what happens at the end of this hypothetical "Einstein revisited"? Especially if 180/16/25 don't win, what exactly does it achieve? The winners won't become World Champions [especially because the conditions are different, you can't claim that this result is what would have happened on Einstein].

If it's for fun, and everyone's good-natured about it, and all teams are willing to participate, I'd be all for it.

But I fear it's not going to end well, and it's not going to bring any justice to proceedings.
I agree 100%. Let IRI be IRI...

I also believe that even though there are a lot of smart people in here discussing ideas about what is the problem and how to fix and things about the field not being used, etc...I don't think that many of you know really how everything operates and what goes on behind the scenes. (neither do I). It's all conjecture.

What we do know is that I'm sure this is now a priority at all levels of FIRST and something will be done about it. We may not hear a public statement from them until kick-off or until beta testing 2012... But I bet things change.
__________________
Donald F. Wright Jr.
Product Manager
AVL Instrumentation & Test Systems, Inc.
Reply With Quote
  #219   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-04-2012, 10:26
Chi Meson's Avatar
Chi Meson Chi Meson is offline
"Strange and Anti-charmed"
AKA: Brian Chidley
FRC #2168 (Aluminum Falcons)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 272
Chi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud ofChi Meson has much to be proud of
Re: Einstein 2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gnishi2011 View Post
So what happens at the end of this hypothetical "Einstein revisited"? Especially if 180/16/25 don't win, what exactly does it achieve? The winners won't become World Champions [especially because the conditions are different, you can't claim that this result is what would have happened on Einstein].

If it's for fun, and everyone's good-natured about it, and all teams are willing to participate, I'd be all for it.

But I fear it's not going to end well, and it's not going to bring any justice to proceedings.
Also agreed. We don't want to require that the winning alliance must show up to validate their win.
Reply With Quote
  #220   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-04-2012, 11:01
LeelandS's Avatar
LeelandS LeelandS is offline
Robots don't quit, and neither do I
AKA: Leeland
FRC #1405 (Finney Falcons)
Team Role: Tactician
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Webster, NY
Posts: 545
LeelandS has a reputation beyond reputeLeelandS has a reputation beyond reputeLeelandS has a reputation beyond reputeLeelandS has a reputation beyond reputeLeelandS has a reputation beyond reputeLeelandS has a reputation beyond reputeLeelandS has a reputation beyond reputeLeelandS has a reputation beyond reputeLeelandS has a reputation beyond reputeLeelandS has a reputation beyond reputeLeelandS has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Einstein 2012

All controversy aside, congratulations to the new world champion, 16/25/180, The Raider Spam Squad (I toyed with Baxter Spam-Botics, but it doesn't sound quite as nice).

And a round of applause to 233/987/207. They were great matches (complications aside). 1126 has a soft spot in our hearts for PINK. We had the honor of teaming with 233 at IRI last year, and got to work with an amazing team (for a brief time, but nevertheless). 233, like ourselves, is one of the teams considered one of the best to have never won the world championship (not saying we're anywhere near the level PINK is. Not even close). PINK is one of my favorite team, they always build great robots, and we hope they don't need to wait too much longer to win the big one we all know they deserve.

Personally, I was hoping the 2056/1114/4334 alliance would take the gold home, but complications obviously prevented that.

I feel there is an unnecessary amount of backlash towards FIRST. One of the major selling points of FIRST is that we're every bit as fun and competitive as a sporting event, but we all conduct ourselves in a professional manner. Right now, that's not what I'm seeing. Yes, the complications on Einstein are disappointing. We all want to see the best of the best square off on Einstein and put on some great matches. Yes, I'd like to know what happened. But a lot of people seem to be crucifying FIRST for field issue when no one really knows what happened.

What a friend of mine hypothesized was that the targeting systems and such on the robots sucked up too much bandwidth from the FMS, and the easiest way to relive that pressure was to shut robots off for a while. We experiences a similar problem at Finger Lakes, and every team was asked to lower the Frames per Second of their camera. While I'm not sure if that's what happened, and I know I'm not really well versed in how the FMS operates, it seems like a logical idea, and certainly proves that maybe it wasn't JUST the field that was the problem.

What I'm getting at is, maybe it's a little premature to be seeking a pound of flesh from FIRST when we don't know the whole story. Maybe it was the robots, maybe it was the field, maybe it was the robot's interaction with the field. I suggest we wait and see what FIRST says on the matter, if they say anything. Until then, we're largely jumping to conclusions.
__________________
My heart will forever lie with SparX
1126: 2008 - 2011; Where it All Began.
1405: 2013 - Present; A Wanderer is Born.

Work hard, play hard. And maybe someday...
Reply With Quote
  #221   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-04-2012, 11:09
rjbarra rjbarra is offline
GameTime
AKA: Joe Barra
FRC #0020 (Rocketeers)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Clifton Park, New York
Posts: 58
rjbarra is just really nicerjbarra is just really nicerjbarra is just really nicerjbarra is just really nice
Re: Einstein 2012

It is time to get CISCO or Juniper as sponsors and put in a bullet proof network. Einstien should have been tested with practice matches. I will be talking with Cisco this week.
Reply With Quote
  #222   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-04-2012, 11:13
Anupam Goli's Avatar
Anupam Goli Anupam Goli is offline
PCH Q&A co-founder/Scouting Mentor
AKA: noops
FRC #1648 (G3 Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 1,242
Anupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Einstein 2012

In 09 and 10, how effective were the Linksys modules?
__________________
Team 1002: 2008-2012
Team 1648: 2012-2016
Georgia Tech Class of 2016
Reply With Quote
  #223   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-04-2012, 11:23
rjbarra rjbarra is offline
GameTime
AKA: Joe Barra
FRC #0020 (Rocketeers)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Clifton Park, New York
Posts: 58
rjbarra is just really nicerjbarra is just really nicerjbarra is just really nicerjbarra is just really nice
Re: Einstein 2012

http://www.automation.com/content/ni...modules-for-io
Reply With Quote
  #224   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-04-2012, 12:06
sgreco's Avatar
sgreco sgreco is offline
Registered User
AKA: Steven Greco
FRC #2079
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Millis
Posts: 1,031
sgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Einstein 2012

It's too bad that Einstein came down to this. I don't know the details of the problem, but if FIRST addresses nothing else this off-season, they need to address comm problems on the field. This simply cannot happen on the biggest stage, or any lower stage for that matter. It's disappointing in a sense for the teams that won to know that even though they were very deserving champions, there will be some form of an asterisk next to their championship title. It's also disappointing for the teams that lost on Einstein because they will never know exactly what could have happened if they were given a fair chance, with all the robots moving, to win. It's very possible that the winning alliance would have won anyway, regardless of comm issues since everyone was suffering from them. They are very deserving, and I congratulate them on what they were able to do. The Einstein finals were shaping up to be epic. We had a rookie appear on Einstein, 1114 and 2056 were allied together. Hall of fame team 16 was going for their first championship, along side 25 who already had a title to their name. Pink, arguably the best team never to win a championship, was battling to finally take home the hardware with 987 who had beat them on Einstein in 2007 (feels like yesterday). I believe 118 was making their first trip to Einstein along side 548, who was right in the middle of playing their best competition ever to date. It's really a shame, and I hope FIRST addresses this very soon. Something needs to be done about the comm issues. It's been a big problem for teams at all levels of competition, and it simply cannot happen again. We will never know quite how epic these finals could have been, but it will go down in history as yet another FIRST championship, and hopefully successes of next year will overshadow everything that went wrong this year.
Reply With Quote
  #225   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-04-2012, 12:49
Dad1279 Dad1279 is offline
Registered User
FRC #1279 (Cold Fusion)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 511
Dad1279 has much to be proud ofDad1279 has much to be proud ofDad1279 has much to be proud ofDad1279 has much to be proud ofDad1279 has much to be proud ofDad1279 has much to be proud ofDad1279 has much to be proud ofDad1279 has much to be proud ofDad1279 has much to be proud of
Re: Einstein 2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by LeelandS View Post
.......I feel there is an unnecessary amount of backlash towards FIRST. ......
Then you have probably never had your robot randomly die, with no chance to debug/repair/fix a problem that may or may not repeat itself, and may be better or worse at a different regional. It has happened to us, our alliance partners, probably 10% of the teams at any given regional, and has determined the outcome of many (if not all) regional events for the last two years.

This should have been addressed sooner (last year), Obviously the problem was acknowledged by adding the data logging this year. The FTA should make debugging info available, and First should release enough info about the FMS to allow us to debug the situation.

Just to put a dollar amount on it, I'd wager the average team spends more than $10,000 per event. 10 matches per event, $1000/match, $3000 per alliance, $6000 per match for 6 robots on the field. If I was paying a vendor $3000/minute for communications & control, I'd think it reasonable to expect 100% communications.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:58.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi