|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 I.R.I. - Updated Event Information
Agreed
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 I.R.I. - Updated Event Information
I want to see the FiM and MAR champs play off. I vote not having the mentor match to give these 6 teams two more matches across lunch.
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 I.R.I. - Updated Event Information
When will we find out the time of the webcast on May 15th?
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 I.R.I. - Updated Event Information
What do we need to include in the application?
|
|
#20
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2012 I.R.I. - Updated Event Information
I don't want to see an Einstein replay unless all the teams involved wholeheartedly agree to it.
I would like to see the MAR champions face the FiM champions though as an exhibition. -Nick |
|
#21
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2012 I.R.I. - Updated Event Information
Last edited by Jared Russell : 30-04-2012 at 09:24. |
|
#22
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2012 I.R.I. - Updated Event Information
Quote:
This would be a fun way to earn bragging rights between districts. |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 I.R.I. - Updated Event Information
Jared, would you like to expand on that statement?
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 I.R.I. - Updated Event Information
I agree, and IRI is all about the bragging rights!
|
|
#25
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: 2012 I.R.I. - Updated Event Information
I would like to see nothing done that reduces the number of matches or competitive value for non district winners, i.e. the majority of teams in attendance. If the exhibition(s) are held during a time that would not otherwise be used for something beneficial to teams (including the alliance TRIPLE BALANCE PRACTICE that FIRST failed to provide for all CMP alliances), then I would have no problem with them.
|
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 I.R.I. - Updated Event Information
Quote:
I'm as upset as anyone on how much was sucked out of Einstein because of the problems, but that doesn't mean it needs to be redone. |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 I.R.I. - Updated Event Information
Quote:
|
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 I.R.I. - Updated Event Information
Also agreed.
Everyone who saw 118 sit there saw what happened to our #1 alliance in Hartford in the 2nd & 3rd game of semis. After a while we simply had to accept the outcome. We could not possibly claim that we were "supposed to win" or that "we would have won if..." Some things just go that way. In Hartford as in Einstein, the winning alliance deserved their trophies. Someone already said, in another thread, "Let I.R.I. be I.R.I." Looking over my post it might seem like a grudge is lurking. Not So! Let me quickly add that I still think that 118 made one of the best and most beautiful machines I've ever seen and we all wish the Robonauts nothing but the best! Last edited by Chi Meson : 30-04-2012 at 15:56. |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 I.R.I. - Updated Event Information
Is this open to the public?
|
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 I.R.I. - Updated Event Information
Is any team eligible for applying?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|