|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: 3 words.
Quote:
Seriously. Is Flying robots like the "water game" FRC for FTC? - Andrew |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: 3 words.
Why not just buy a quadcopter. Maybe this is some market research for aerial robot kits to design and sell lightweight carbon fiber componanets and drivertrains for build your own quad/hex/octo copter sets...
![]() |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: [FTC]: 3 words.
Quote:
http://collegiateaerialrobotics.org/home |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: 3 words.
Advance more teams!
128 NOT ENOUGH FTC overtaking FRC Encourage US Open More autonomous please make endgame count reward advanced programming simplify ranking structure |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [FTC]: 3 words.
YES. To me, autonomous is very undervalued in FTC, even though the whole premise of real (professional) robotics is to create a robot that can move autonomously with sensors and complex programming.
Heck, the definition of a robot even specifies that it moves "automatically." Our team liked FLL because programming and sensors could actually get you points. It seems in FTC it's all about building a reliable mechanism and being a good driver. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: 3 words.
odd field shape
Just get their imagination to think outside the box. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: 3 words.
Ken's blog has a quad copter of LEGO, Tetrix, & lightweight motors and props.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: 3 words.
More Magnet Elements
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|