|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Lessons Learned:The Negative
Quote:
You need something like the Georgia Dome or the Edwards Jones Dome in St. Louis to have the space. Or Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis If there is something like this in Vegas I am all for it...I don't think Seattle has anything big enough... or Portland... The Seahawk stadium is outside... no pro football in Portland... The size of the venue is really restricting... |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Lessons Learned:The Negative
That will be a problem for a lot of places known for nicer weather!
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Lessons Learned:The Negative
Quote:
Quote:
I suggest Lucas Oil in Indy... there are rarely tornadoes there, the worst weather is usually small hail (pea size, once in a blue moon golf ball size). |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Lessons Learned:The Negative
We could have it in North Carolina. There are pretty big stadiums over there.
In Fayetteville where I grew up we had the Crown Center used for Graduations, Minor League Hockey games, and concerts. Maybe not big enough for a championship but its big enough to hold a competition. (Also there isnt a big area for pits in the Center but there is an Exposition Center that goes from 10,000 sq feet to 60,000 square feet. Pretty much NEXT door!!! ) I really like this area because there is a lot of room. http://www.atthecrown.com/facilities.aspx Please check this out! |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2012 Lessons Learned:The Negative
Less than 100 teams in a division would be great. Also, I agree with the idea of division awards. When there are 400 teams, that means that over 90% of teams attending the championship will come home with nothing as far as hardware is concerned. This is too big of a margin in my opinion.
FIRST really needs to do something on their online system. Not only is the FIRST website clunky and hard to navigate around, some of its most important information is very well hidden. For example, how do I find out what awards a team from my area (or something like that) has won? It is impossible to find, especially for "outsiders." Stuff like that should be easy to find and more up-front. And it's not just for awards. It is hard to find any information about teams and events, and when you do, a lot of times it is very outdated or misinformed. Going along with that, why has the Hall of Fame been swept into the corner and out of the way the past two years? They should be out front for everyone to see. I was disappointed with its location last year tucked into a corner. This year, I was even more disappointed with its size and location. Had I not known what I was looking for, I would have missed the Hall of Fame teams. These are your best teams and the model teams for FIRST. They deserve to be out front in plain sight for everyone to see. The finale was much better than last year, but it was a logistical nightmare. Granted, it was complicated even more with the weather issue. However, I know we almost had some issues keeping track of our students across four different venues, and I can't imagine how hard it would be for some other teams. Keep it in one place, or two places at minimum. Having four different parties going on at once is just too much. On a lighter note (and I guess this belongs in the positive), I am very glad that FIRST has stepped away from the path they were trying to go down last year. Rock stars, rock concerts, famous people, big names are all great, but when they overshadow what the event is truly about, it becomes disturbing. Don't change who we are to appeal more to the outside world. Change the outside world around us and inspire them to join. I am very glad that FIRST has put a better balance on what is important. |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2012 Lessons Learned:The Negative
Quote:
...The concert was a celebration of our 20th year, donated to us. Wouldn't you take that if it were given to you? will.i.am choosing to connect with Dean and with FIRST was a such a wonderful opportunity. Will supports FIRST, and continues to do so. Having such a big name being able to go around and tell others about our program? Talk about culture change... |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Lessons Learned:The Negative
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2012 Lessons Learned:The Negative
I understand that. What I'm saying is that the entire year last year they kept saying "FIRST kids aren't geeks." Stuff like that. They kept trying to change the image of who we are. In the words of Dave Lavery, "I'm a geek and I'm $@#$@#$@#$@# proud of it." THAT'S who FIRST is. Promote our image and who we are, don't change it to appeal to the rest of the world. That may not have been what their intentions were, but that's how it came across to a lot of people.
And yes, the concert was nice. However, when FIRST blatantly lied to us about why the fields were in the pits, that was pretty offensive. Bill Miller said that the fields in the pits has nothing to do with the concert at all, which was obviously a lie. FIRST was originally planning to have half of the dome empty until the concert plan came through? I'm sorry, but that's bull and everyone knows it. It's all a part of the transparency issue. The lies are where the issue is. If they are going to do something like that, at least be truthful and up front with us. FIRST gave the image that the Black Eyed Peas and famous people are more important than the students and the competition. The image was that they kicked us out of the dome for the concert. Like I said, the concert was great and it was a great time, but things could have been handled differently. I know that this was not the image that FIRST was planning on giving, but that's how it came across to the teams. Libby, everything you said in the post you linked to should have been publicly announced and explained by FIRST. I understand where you are coming from and I agree with everything you have said. All I'm asking is to try to see it from our point of view. I think everyone can agree that you probably have more of an inside view than the rest of us do... This is what it looked like from our point of view: We had no warning or explanation for what was going to transpire at the cmp '11, then suddenly shortly before we got there, FIRST tells us that the fields are now in the pits (which, by the way, was a part of the "original plan" according to Bill Miller) and there will be a concert stage in the dome (which had nothing to do with the fields in the pits according to Bill Miller). Then having to play almost the entire cmp (with the exception of 2 matches) in the pits with seats that could not fit everybody (we had parents that could not watch matches because there were no seats) combined with other problems and discomforts and pains. All of this for a concert. FIRST had at this point yet to give a public announcement explaining why all of this was going on and to explain to teams the inside information that you have been saying. And then on top of that, we get what is obviously a lie about why we were experiencing what we were experiencing. The teams and robots were being overshadowed and kicked under the bus for the rock stars. Then there were other things that furthered our frustration, such as the hall of fame teams being shoved into the corner where nobody could see them, and out in the open is all of the big name sponsors, etc. I actually looked for the hall of fame to talk to them, and couldn't find them for the longest time. This year was a little better. All I'm saying is that all of this gave the wrong image and there was not enough transparency to the teams. FIRST's heart was in the right place last year. I'm not saying the concert and Will.I.Am is a bad thing. In fact, I think it's great. But their approach left a little to be desired. This year, FIRST had a better balance in promoting the students and who we are. I'm not just saying that the CMP was better this year because of the fields issues. Everything was handled better and there was a better balance everywhere one looked between the students and teams and robots and who FIRST is and the big names and sponsors. Logistics-wise the event was better as well. Things were laid out better mostly because FIRST had learned from last year. Things flowed better, etc. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Lessons Learned:The Negative
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Taylor : 18-05-2012 at 14:20. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Lessons Learned:The Negative
Quote:
Consequently, because of the celebrities and that hype we got a great opportunity. It was pretty awesome!!!!!!!!! |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2012 Lessons Learned:The Negative
Quote:
Painting with broad brush strokes almost always results in an ugly picture. |
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2012 Lessons Learned:The Negative
Wait, I thought this thread was about 2012?
![]() |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Lessons Learned:The Negative
Quote:
Yup. I'm a geek and sufficiently self-confident that I don't care whether or not other people care, but there are plenty of FIRSTers who are passionate about science and technology but aren't into the whole "geek pride" thing. |
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2012 Lessons Learned:The Negative
Quote:
-dave Last edited by dlavery : 20-05-2012 at 01:23. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Lessons Learned:The Negative
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|