|
|
|
 With any dollar amount to invest I would be more interested in the number of individuals (students is too narrow) impacted than the number of teams created--after all, this is about people. - kramarczyk [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#7
10-01-2003, 23:34
|
|||
|
|||
|
The opponent robot in your zone does not affect the eligibility of the stack.
But, my brother suggested that this might make a great blackmail strategy, if you have a really tall armed robot and are going up against a team that is almost guaranteed a top spot. "You know, we'll give you a huge negative QP unless..." How's that gratious professionalism? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Powerbook update? | evulish | Chit-Chat | 1 | 01-08-2003 18:48 |
| Will There Ever Be Negative Scores? | Joe Matt | General Forum | 30 | 18-01-2003 17:15 |
| Stop Posting About Negative Scores | Adam Y. | General Forum | 25 | 13-01-2003 15:44 |
| Rules Clarification in Team Update #1 | dlavery | General Forum | 8 | 08-01-2003 12:36 |
| Why is'nt FIRST publishing scores? | Ben Mitchell | General Forum | 7 | 15-03-2002 14:38 |
Threaded Mode