|
|
|
 Learning by failure is quite common. - Gdeaver [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: What's the 15-second strategy? | |||
| Dead-reckon like a deranged juggernaught? |
  
|
10 | 66.67% |
| Trace the line at an excruciatingly slow pace? |
  
|
3 | 20.00% |
| Strategically and deftly apply 579 Newtons to the carpet for the time? |
  
|
2 | 13.33% |
| Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Probably already covered, but curious, Dead-reckoning or no?
Line tracking is hard. 3 out of 10 grad students at Carnegie-Mellon had trouble with it. It 'aint easy. However, apparently there's a lot of "backlash" in the gears, so dead-reckoning won't be quite accurate. possibly counting shaft revolutions and/or time can give semi-accurate location and speen input.
Line-following with a slowish (but still good) processor aint to good either... it would take 4/60ths of a second for the signal to get to the first processor anyway... and that's a long time. So, what are some ideas out there? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| White Paper Discuss: 2003 Automated Dead Reckoning Test Code | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 10 | 07-09-2005 11:25 |
| A DEAD reckoning program | rcubes85 | Programming | 5 | 19-03-2003 14:21 |
| Autonomous Mode Strategy | Brian48216 | Programming | 27 | 23-01-2003 14:47 |
| dead robot in the finals? | srawls | Rules/Strategy | 2 | 24-03-2002 14:44 |
Threaded Mode