|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
In the derivation for the maximum velocity near the end of the slides, it defines a 0.9 for "drive friction slowing the robot down". However, there is already an "eff" (efficiency) defined for drive losses. Is the extra 0.9 meant to account for rolling friction, or something else?
-- Jeff |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Robot output torque | Alex1072 | Technical Discussion | 9 | 12-03-2003 22:13 |
| Power, speed, and torque... AGH | Gui Cavalcanti | Technical Discussion | 5 | 10-11-2002 19:02 |
| Friction, traction, torque - oh my... | Gui Cavalcanti | Technical Discussion | 30 | 13-08-2002 18:01 |
| How fast could a torque motor turn if a torque motor could.. | archiver | 2001 | 0 | 23-06-2002 22:54 |
| Traction Limited, rather than torque | Simon G | Technical Discussion | 6 | 23-01-2002 07:08 |