|
|
|
 This isn't a science fair, sometimes it's okay to give away the answer, especially if they learned something on the way there. - Karthik [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| This isn't a science fair, sometimes it's okay to give away the answer, especially if they learned something on the way there. - Karthik [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Further thoughts.
If you have 3 stacks of 5 bins, 4 bins laying scattered about the score zone, and a stack of 7 bins, this is how the score will be calculated: [(3*5)+4] * 7 Not any other way. You don't need to bother with the 7 bins in the first half of that equation. More examples: You have a multiplier stack of 4 bins, and one bin lying next to the stack 1*4=4. |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Powerbook update? | evulish | Chit-Chat | 1 | 01-08-2003 18:48 |
| Will There Ever Be Negative Scores? | Joe Matt | General Forum | 30 | 18-01-2003 17:15 |
| Stop Posting About Negative Scores | Adam Y. | General Forum | 25 | 13-01-2003 15:44 |
| Rules Clarification in Team Update #1 | dlavery | General Forum | 8 | 08-01-2003 12:36 |
| Why is'nt FIRST publishing scores? | Ben Mitchell | General Forum | 7 | 15-03-2002 14:38 |
Hybrid Mode
