IRI Rule Changes - 2012

[Travis Hoffman]

Originally Posted by lemiant

This is an interesting list. Your addition of "ain't no big thing, we'll beat it" and "triples are overrated" to opposing the change is really inaccurate though. Go back, read Tyler's post. Him and anyone with similar opinions are definitely in the pro (or at least neutral) camp

Hey I'm padding the stats to start.

Those who are indifferent/defiant to the presence of triples are definitely not pro. I can dig NEUTRAL. Let's refine:

#DISCLAIMER - a team number appearing below indicates a member of that team has indicated their preference for rule #3 one way or another. That does not automatically mean the entire team shares their viewpoint. It was easier to note the CD user's team number. If two members of a team indicate differing opinions, I will indicate this via their usernames. Not that this list is anything more than an informal two-minute skim of information that was already clear from reading the thread. :-)

PRO:

• 67 (W)
• 68 (W)
• 234 (W)
• 341 (W)
• 868 (SQ)
• 907 (W)
• 3940 (W)
• 4334 (W)

NEUTRAL:

• 33 (W)
• 359 (L)
• 548 (L)
• 829 (W)
• 1640 (SW)
• 2056 (L)

CON:

• 48 (L)
• 340 (L)
• 461 (L)
• 744 (L)
• 772 (L)
• 2168 (L)
• 2337 (L)
• 3193 (L)
• 3310 (L)
• Secret Unnamed Team (L)