|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: IRI 2012 fantasy match-ups
I'm more interested in seeing how teams have improved (or otherwise) since Championships, and finally getting a chance to take pictures of nice robots (being a driver and programmer, I got very little free time at CMP).
I'll vote for Karthik vs Paul. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: IRI 2012 fantasy match-ups
I'd like to see 1114 (Canadian powerhouse), 341 (insane wide bot shooter), and 16 (super defence/support bot) vs. 2056 (Canadian powerhouse), 67 (insane wide bot shooter), and (insert super defence/support bot here)
|
|
#3
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: IRI 2012 fantasy match-ups
2056, 2826, 1114 vs. 118, 341, 67
... |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: IRI 2012 fantasy match-ups
Your really pushing this triple balance thing
![]() |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI 2012 fantasy match-ups
Who says that we would need to triple balance with these three bots??? ![]() |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: IRI 2012 fantasy match-ups
Quote:
OPR dictates that the wide alliance beats the long alliance 107-99, so yes, the triple might help ![]() ~insert rant on why OPR is a flawed indicator in Rebound Rumble~ Last edited by Gregor : 28-06-2012 at 01:33. Reason: Typo |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: IRI 2012 fantasy match-ups
Won't be a leveled evaluation as plenty of teams won't be using the same drivers.
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: IRI 2012 fantasy match-ups
I was mostly thinking of those 5 pounds. I like to see designs evolve as flaws are seen and fixed over time.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|