|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: IRI 2012 fantasy match-ups
2056, 2826, 1114 vs. 118, 341, 67
... |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: IRI 2012 fantasy match-ups
Won't be a leveled evaluation as plenty of teams won't be using the same drivers.
|
|
#18
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: IRI 2012 fantasy match-ups
Your really pushing this triple balance thing
![]() |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI 2012 fantasy match-ups
Who says that we would need to triple balance with these three bots??? ![]() |
|
#20
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: IRI 2012 fantasy match-ups
I was mostly thinking of those 5 pounds. I like to see designs evolve as flaws are seen and fixed over time.
|
|
#21
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: IRI 2012 fantasy match-ups
Quote:
OPR dictates that the wide alliance beats the long alliance 107-99, so yes, the triple might help ![]() ~insert rant on why OPR is a flawed indicator in Rebound Rumble~ Last edited by Gregor : 28-06-2012 at 01:33. Reason: Typo |
|
#22
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: IRI 2012 fantasy match-ups
Quote:
)I think we should put together a off-season event that is Canada vs USA. I was talking with someone on 781 about doing one of these in Windsor (where our team is from and is right across the river from Detroit). |
|
#23
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: IRI 2012 fantasy match-ups
I'd like to see:
341 - 254 -973 vs 1114 - 2056 - 16 -RC |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: IRI 2012 fantasy match-ups
What I'd like to see:
1717-1717-1717 vs 1717-1717-1717 But, I'll go for: 2056-1114-254 vs 341-973-118 If there are 3 longs who can triple well enough to match 3 wides, then 2056-1114-254 would be them. As for a wide team, you gotta have 341 and 118. 973's swerve drive + pickup mechanism is great for a starvation/feeding defensive tactic, plus they play killer offense. |
|
#25
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: IRI 2012 fantasy match-ups
1114, 2056, 2826 VS 67, 341, 469.
-Nick |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI 2012 fantasy match-ups
That sounds like an amazing matchup. I second this.
|
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI 2012 fantasy match-ups
Aye, me too.
The best part is that I think 1717 would beat 1717. Think about it, 1717-1717-1717 would go to triple (and assume the game is close), but now 1717 breaks out their anti-triple balance strategy. At this point, 1717-1717 have gone to double balance, 1717 is shooting their butts off, and they win - Sunny G. |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI 2012 fantasy match-ups
48-330-548 vs 25-68-1023
Arm bots vs single pollychord lifts to a hooded shooter. I was very upset us and 330 were never paired up on Newton, I wanted to see the arms go up together! |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI 2012 fantasy match-ups
I would love to see a match where all the rookies (3940, 3947,and 4334) are on one alliance.
Last edited by ENeyman : 28-06-2012 at 11:38. |
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI 2012 fantasy match-ups
I would like to see a drive coach Dodgeball match where all the drive coaches are brought down on the field 50% on 1 side, 50% on the other, with balls allocated per the start of game rules (I.e. two on each bridge and 2 each to 3 designated coaches per side that). teams would not be allowed to cross the midfield barrier.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|