|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
|
I highly doubt a team will give up 25 king of the hill points, just to get negative QP!!!!!
A more likely situation is that a team will be a team getting less then 3 boxes in their scoring zone. lemme breake it down. 3 box = 2-1 = 1 2 box = 1-1 = 0 1box = 0-1 = -1 0 box = 0-0 = 0 my sugestion - very easy the stack* with the most boxes in it is multiplied by the TOTAL number of boxes in the scoring zone. PERIOD, NO MATER WHAT! *definition of stack dictionary.com "An orderly pile, especially one arranged in layers." Legalese / Mattsk=peak "A group of boxes supported by 1 and only 1 box, or any nonbox item. each box can only directly support 1other box. any stack not fitting this description is not elegible for the high stack.THATS IT; The boxes in it are just regular boxes!!! high points (pun intended ) in this plan
ps. this exact same message will be posted in all negative point threads, and in its own poll thread in the rules forum. any updates/replies should be posted in poll thread, so please make sticky. goto the poll thread and lets make it a petitition!!!! pps. sorry bout the speling, gammer, too many !'s and bouts of RAGE; its 3:45 AM!! -Matt Stearn CUL8R Last edited by Brandon Martus : 12-01-2003 at 15:55. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Powerbook update? | evulish | Chit-Chat | 1 | 01-08-2003 18:48 |
| Will There Ever Be Negative Scores? | Joe Matt | General Forum | 30 | 18-01-2003 17:15 |
| Stop Posting About Negative Scores | Adam Y. | General Forum | 25 | 13-01-2003 15:44 |
| Rules Clarification in Team Update #1 | dlavery | General Forum | 8 | 08-01-2003 12:36 |
| Why is'nt FIRST publishing scores? | Ben Mitchell | General Forum | 7 | 15-03-2002 14:38 |