|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FIRST is really looking into the Einstein problems
Everyone,
The report is getting very, very close. Bill's departure has added to the workload a little at HQ. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FIRST is really looking into the Einstein problems
Excuse me while I go obsessively check the FRC Blog every few minutes.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FIRST is really looking into the Einstein problems
This is from the introduction to the PDF containing the results of the testing.
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FIRST is really looking into the Einstein problems
Thread about the report here: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=107285
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FIRST is really looking into the Einstein problems
Read the report in detail.
Lots of "might haves" and "possiblys". No real root cause whatsoever identified. The mystery lives on. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FIRST is really looking into the Einstein problems
Quote:
They are being conservative in what the claim as "intentional interference". Even in matches where a witness saw the individual doing what we now know was the hack, they described it as "likely". Only in the case where the individual *admitted* to it, is it described as "confirmed". We left New Hampshire with the confidence that there will be many specific improvements next year and that hacks like this will be detected by the field. I honestly look forward to the improvements in the system next year. Last edited by Hjelstrom : 14-07-2012 at 16:24. Reason: forgot to mention National Instruments |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FIRST is really looking into the Einstein problems
The report has been made public and there has been time to read and review the findings.
There was a big push for FIRST to act, and act quickly, following the troubles that arose on the 2012 Einstein field competition. I'm interested in seeing what type of closure this has brought to this thread and to those who contributed to it. The thought, with great power comes great responsibility, has been with me for several days. I've been trying to poke holes in the thought as it applies to the work that was done by everyone committed to identifying the problems and documenting them. I can't find any holes to poke - everyone involved acted responsibly and with great integrity. The experience, and how it has been handled, provides all of us with insight towards a newly raised bar of working together, sharing knowledge and experience, and being humble and open to the process of identifying weaknesses, trouble spots, and problems. It's not an easy thing to do to keep egos in check and trust the opportunity being made available. We can all learn from these teams and these leaders who were willing to step up to that bar and, by doing so, move it to a higher level. It's been an incredible experience to be able to follow this process from the peanut gallery. I won't put what I've experienced and learned from all of you to waste. I will use it wisely. This is a promise. Thank you. Jane |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FIRST is really looking into the Einstein problems
I'm glad this has been an incredible experience for you. For our team, this has been one of the most heartbreaking and deflating experiences possible. I'm glad you want to revel in the sunshine here, but perhaps you should remember that there are still a lot of people who are very hurt and upset. Sure, it's just a robotics competition, but some of us actually care about the robots...
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FIRST is really looking into the Einstein problems
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FIRST is really looking into the Einstein problems
Quote:
That someone would interfere intentionally with Einstein has robbed us all of something. Those us of us watching were robbed of what could've been a spectacular finish to one of the best FRC seasons of the modern era. Twelve teams were robbed of the chance to compete on even terms. And frankly, everyone that's ever set foot on a FIRST field, from corn kernels on, was robbed of a certain innocence, the ability to say "We're better than that." Now we're forced to settle for "All but one of us are better than that, and we threw that bum out." I hail from a state that has combined for two Einstein appearances ever. We know how rare the shot at the title is, and just how wronged everyone was this year in St. Louis. But without a time machine to hunt down that individual and slap the cell phone out of his hand, all we can do is make the most of the events that follow. This has triggered a number of procedural and technological improvements that will hopefully benefit all teams in the future. And it has served as a stern warning to anyone else thinking they'd want to interfere with a match. I agree that this came at far too high a cost, but at least we all got a sliver of something for our disappointment and heartache. |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FIRST is really looking into the Einstein problems
I've read the report and digested it at this point, and I'm posting here because I of my posts being critical of method process for the trouble shooting.
I have to say I believe they did the job correctly and had the right people there based on what I gathered from this report. I think they did the best job possible given what they had to work with. To those of you that don't understand how it feels to be so close playing for the championship and have something outside your control end your run I really can't explain how it feels. I really feel for the entire Eh-team and understand you pain. I had a litany of other instances I was going to post here about things that have been done wrong on Einstein over the last several years proving the point that this is not an isolated occurance, but it adds nothing to the discussion. I hope in the future FIRST pays attention to all aspects of what goes on and around the field in the future. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FIRST is really looking into the Einstein problems
What you, and your team, experienced throughout 2012 certainly inhales audibly and I can't fathom what it's been like (I wouldn't want to). What Patrick said rings true.
I'm having trouble connecting the dots between Jane's post about learning from the engineering processes of problem solving, troubleshooting, and documentation to your taking it as an attack to your team. Tragedies happened. We've learned from them, as individuals, as teams, as a community. Why choose to focus on the hurt and distress rather than embrace the lessons that have come? Everybody "cares about the robots" - otherwise we'd be doing science fairs. Otherwise there would have been no investigation, involving people across North America, some not even involved with the 12 Einstein teams Can't we also care about and celebrate the processes, the professionalism, the experience of healing? |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FIRST is really looking into the Einstein problems
I'm with Taylor Karthik, I don't see how you link Jane's post with the pain your team experienced.
I can try and understand what you guys are going through but there is no way any of us can say we really can. I am truly sorry. But we have to treat this as a learning experience and carve whatever good we can from the whole thing. I really hope you guys can too. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FIRST is really looking into the Einstein problems
Quote:
Us armchair QBs can say that we learned a lot and will put it to good use -- but did we really go through the process? I don't think we did. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FIRST is really looking into the Einstein problems
What I wrote in this thread had to do with this thread. It also had to do with the respect I've felt for those directly involved with situation. It is one that has continually shown us what we are made of as members of FRC.
Jane |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|